Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06629-99
Original file (06629-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JRE
Docket No: 6629-99
10 January 2001

From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:

Secretary of the Navy

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

FORMER
REVIEW

(a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) DD Form 149
(2) Subject’s naval record

1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that naval record be corrected to
show, in effect, that he was discharged for medical reasons, vice fraudulent enlistment.

2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Chapman, Mcculloch and Zsalman, reviewed
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 4 January 2001 and, pursuant to its
regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner’s allegations
of error and injustice finds as follows:

a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies

available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b. Petitioner completed a Standard Form (SF) 93, Report of Medical History, on 24

July 1998, in connection with his preenlistment physical examination. He specifically
denied that he had ever been a sleepwalker. The report of physical examination was updated
on 20 January 1999, and Petitioner denied any significant interval history, and made no
amendments to the SF 93. He enlisted in the Marine Corps on 20 January 1999, at 
He was noted to sleep walk shortly thereafter, and he disclosed his pre-service history of
sleepwalking at that time. He was discharged from the Marine Corps on 11 March 1999 for
fraudulent entry, based on his concealment of his history of sleepwalking.

aze 18.

C. MARCORPSEPMAN, paragraph 

6203.2a, provides for the discharge of Marines for

the convenience of the government for a physical condition not a disability, to include
sleepwalking. Paragraph 6204.2 a(2) provides, in effect, that a Marine may not 

bc

discharged for erroneous enlistment if the enlistment was the result of fraudulent conduct on
6204.3b, provides, in part, that entries made in an SF 93
the part of the Marine. Paragraph 
shall not be used as a basis for processing a recruit for discharge due to fraudulent
enlistment.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that
Petitioner’s discharge for fraudulent entry was improper because it was based on the SF 93
he completed prior to enlistment, in contravention of the terms of MARCORPSEPMAN
paragraph 
following corrective action.

6204.3b. Accordingly, it finds the existence of an injustice warranting the

RECOMMENDATION:

a. That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected to show that he was discharged from the

Marine Corps on 11 March 1999 for the convenience of the government, pursuant to
MARCORPSEPMAN paragraph 
disability, interfering with his performance of duty.

6203.2a(3),  due to sleepwalking, a physical condition not a

b. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner ’s naval record.

4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board ’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures
of the Board for correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

= 

W. DEAN
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02020-03

    Original file (02020-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 17 March 1999. that his naval record be reviewed Petitioner's Mr.- Mr..* and Ms. 2. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he received a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08619-00

    Original file (08619-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was honorably discharged from the Marine Corps for a reason other than fraudulent enlistment. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Bishop, Lightle and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 June 2001 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01990-02

    Original file (01990-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although it appears that Petitioner's application was not filed in a timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the statute of limitations and review the application on its merits. e. Petitioner states in his application that he to1,d the recruiter about the treatment for depression, and that he had no similar problems since April 1995. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 4 September 1998 he received an entry level separation by reason of erroneous...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2000 | 07679-00

    Original file (07679-00.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a reason for discharge other than fraudulent enlistment. Accordingly, the Board recommends that Petitioner’s reason for separation be changed to erroneous enlistment instead of fraudulent enlistment. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 01819-10

    Original file (01819-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was discharged by reason of an adjustment disorder rather than fraudulent entry. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Geberth, Spooner and Tew, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 December 2010 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01626-01

    Original file (01626-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the following typewritten entry from item 25 (“Physician’s summary and elaboration of all pertinent data (Physician shall comment on all positive answers in items 9 through 24.“) of the Standard Form (SF) 93 (“Report of Medical History”) dated 11 October 1996: “4. “4...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09100-02

    Original file (09100-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. The Board, consisting of Messrs. 2 reviewed Petitioner's allegations o injustice on 12 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, , determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 05038-09

    Original file (05038-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that he was discharged for a reason other than fraudulent entry. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ae: RFs nd eI eV i ewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 4 March 2010 and, pursuant...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2701 14

    Original file (NR2701 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 29 January 1999, an NPC message directed that her command prepare a page 13 counseling/warning stating that she was being retained in the Navy despite her defective enlistment and induction due to fraudulent entry as evidenced by her failure to disclose pre-service treatment for alcohol abuse. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board concludes that by her disclosing her pre-service DUI, five day alcohol awareness class and wrongful use of marijuana in...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2001_Navy | ND01-00650

    Original file (ND01-00650.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Pt will be referred to Legal for admin separation for a Sleepwalking Disorder. After a thorough review of the records, supporting documents, facts, and circumstances unique to this case, the Board found that the discharge was proper but inequitable (C and D).The Board carefully reviewed the applicant’s service record, issues, and additional documentation and found the applicant’s service warranted characterization as honorable. The applicant’s record had no adverse information, and the...