Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06702-01
Original file (06702-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH:ddj
Docket No: 6702-01
8 January 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 811 of 5 November 2001, a copy of which is
attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

MAW  

PERSOWWEL  COMMAND

5720 

INTEDRITY  DRIVE

YILLlMDTo*  

TN 

2805  

5-0000

1160
PERS-811
05 Nov 01

MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHAIRMAN,
RECORDS

Subj:

BCNR PETITION
595-56-7023

ICO

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

Ref:

(a) SNM'S DD Form 149 dtd 22 Aug 01
(b)  MILPERSMAN 1160-100

In response to reference (a),

1.
the petitioner's request.

recommend disapproval of

a.

The petitioner re-entered active duty on 27 Nov

00, after a break in service.
(b) STAR program offers career designation to first term
enlisted members.

In accordance with reference

In view of the above,

2 .
remain as is.

recommend the petitioner's record

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the
(BCNR)

3.
use by the Board for correction of Naval Records  
only.

is returned.

Enclosure

(1)

eenlistment

Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06029-01

    Original file (06029-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner has received the benefits of the extension by accepting the PCS orders and completing the transfer to the new command. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the 3. use by the Board for correction of Naval Records only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08280-01

    Original file (08280-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 811 of 30 January 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner had orders to CTR "A" school with a class 3. convening date of 22 May 01 and a projected graduation date of 26 September 2001. graduated early and reenlisted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08063-02

    Original file (08063-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (c) listed NAVHOSP GREAT The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08203-02

    Original file (08203-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner was discharged from the Navy on 08 October 1993 after serving 2 years 08 months and 21 days of active service.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08377-01

    Original file (08377-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend disapproval of the There are no waivers granted for zones. recommend the petitioner's request This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the (1) 4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07925-02

    Original file (07925-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 December 2002. The petitioner requests to receive the LSRB for the reenlistment of 29 January 2002. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08622-02

    Original file (08622-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, on of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to probable material error or injustice. The petitione requests to receive the LSRB for the Command/OPNAV cannot provide information c) prior to the reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record remain as This is an adviso 3. by the Board for Corr memorandum to reference (a) for use tion of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08260-01

    Original file (08260-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 February 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09918-07

    Original file (09918-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in Support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05024-01

    Original file (05024-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 2001. reference The petitioner graduated from HM "C" school on 18 April At the time the petitioner negotiated and received...