DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
JLP:ddj
Docket No: 6629-00
24 September 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 15.52.
bn 24 September 2002. Your allegations of error and
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 7000 Ser
of which is attached.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
N132D7/003-02 of 9 September 2002, a copy
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion.
the members of the panel will be furnished
yollr application has been denied. The names and votes of
Accordingly,
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
700 0
Ser
9 Sep 02
N132D7/003-02
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION
OF NAVAL RECORDS
Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB
ATIONS
ICO IS3
Via:
Subj:
Ref:
Financial
(a)
Chapter 24
(b)
Delivery Vehicle
August 2002
Phoncon
Management
Regulation
Volume
7A,
DCNO
(N132D7A)
QMCM
Team TWO
Paraloft PR
/ SEA L
on 2
oncon DCNO
n 9 September 2002
(N132D7A) QMCM Marshall/
Encl:
(1) BCNR Case File
Record
#06629-00 w/Microfiche Service
The following
1.
is provided.
recommendation concerning enclosure
(I)
The petitioner
2.
for jumps completed while assigned
VEHICLE TEAM TWO for the period of 01 NOVEMBER 99 to 10
DECEMBER 99.
is requesting payment of Parachute Pay
onboard SEAL DELIVERY
a Navy member who
240201 and Table 24-3
As defined in paragraphs
3.
reference (a);
orders to perform
primary duty is
enclosure (1) and references (b)
petitioner did not meet the criteria and thereby was not
entitled to
DECEMBER 99.
as a
A review of
and (c) revealed that the
duty involving parachute jumping
entitled to Parachute Pay.
is required by competent
01 NOVEMBER 99 to 10
Parachute
Pay from
of
4.
Recommend denying the petitioners request.
N132D7A
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03215-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. This was more than a month after you had reenlisted. 2. reenlistment date of 13 August 1999 to 04 October 1999 for four years.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03134-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 January 2003. Reference (a) regarding former LC retirement rank to Former LCD requested comments and recommendations equest for restoration of his stment of his retirement pay. k As this fact will never The action requested by the petitioner should be denied 3. because these issues were considered by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy when his retirement was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06342-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08112-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. AC) uses the Last-In-First-Out (LIFO) rule to determine what IAW reference leave is charged when a member takes leave.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05377-08
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 September 2008. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandums 7220 N130C3/08U0636 and7220 N130C3/08U0638 of 4 September 2008, a copy each is attached. N130C recommends disapproval of the petitioner’s request to draw BAH at the with-dependent rate for the time period of 1 Mar 96 to 23 Apr 02. jrye Sud D. Silva Assistant, Pay...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06283-02
That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing from the service record page “I 11 ( “Administrative Remarks (1070)“) entry dated 21 July 1993 the following sentence: understand that action will be taken to ’void my additional MOS of 9962 and to revoke the authority to wear the Navy/Marine Corps Parachutist Insignia. states in his rebuttal statement, "refused to jump during a d. Paragraph 4012 of the IRAM provides guidance in the preparation of a page 11 entry if a Marine has been...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05929-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. IAW reference (b), payment of BAH at dependent location is A review of the petitioner's Master Military The reasons listed by - 4.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05603-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00833-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00167-02
Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser N which is attached. Enclosure (1) indicates a request for retroactive payment of Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) at the w/dependent rate for vice his Permanent...