Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06760-02
Original file (06760-02.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

                                2 NAVY ANNEX

                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


                                                   TJR
                                                   Docket No: 6760-02
                                                   23 April 2003


From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:   Secretary of the Navy

        REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD


Ref:  (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552

End:  (1) DD Form 149 with attachments
        (2) Case summary
        (3) Subject’s naval record

1.    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former
enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting
that the characterization of his discharge be changed.

2.    The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, Harrison, and Pfeiffer,
reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 22 April 2003
and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action
indicated below should be taken on the avail~ble evidence of record.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the enclosures,
naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.

3.    The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record Pertaining to
Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice finds as follows:

    a.      Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
administrative remedies available under existing law and regulations within
the Department of the Navy.

    b.      Although it appears that enclosure (1) was not filed in a
timely manner, it is in the interest of justice to waive the statute of
limitations and review the application on its merits.

    c.      Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 5 June 1944 at the age of
15. However, at that time he said he was 18 years of age.

    d.      Petitioner served without disciplinary incident and on 2 August
1944 he was assigned a conduct mark of 4.0.
    e.      On 29 August 1944 Petitioner’s mother submitted a letter to his
commanding officer in which she stated, in part, that she was unaware of
his enlistment because she had been hospitalized. She also provided a birth
certificate which set forth Petitioner’s date of birth as November 20,
1928, and requested that Petitioner be sent home.

    f.      On 26 September 1944 Petitioner’s commanding officer submitted
a recommendation for retention in which he stated, in part, that Petitioner
was sufficiently mature for retention in the service.

    g.      On 6 October 1944 the foregoing recommendation was disapproved
and Petitioner’s commanding officer was directed to process Petitioner for
separation by reason of underage of authorized enlistment. Subsequently, on
26 October 1944, Petitioner was issued a general discharge under honorable
conditions. At the time of his discharge Petitioner’s conduct average of
4.0 was sufficiently higher than the average mark of 3.25 normally required
for a fully honorable characterization of service.

CONCLUSION:

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board
concludes that Petitioner’s request warrants favorable action.

The Board initially notes that Petitioner served without disciplinary
infractions and based its finding on Petitioner’s extreme youth, length of
service, and periodic conduct marks. In this regard, the Board notes that
Petitioner’s conduct average was considerably higher than the requirement
for a fully honorable characterization of service. Based on the foregoing,
the Board concludes that no useful purpose is served by continuing to
characterize Petitioner’s service as having been under honorable
conditions, and recharacterization to a fully honorable discharge is
appropriate. Accordingly, the Board concludes that relief in the form of
recharacterization of Petitioner’s discharge is appropriate.

In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice
warranting the following corrective action.

RECOMMENDATION:

    a.      That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show that on 26
October 1944 he received an honorable discharge vice the general discharge
actually issued on that same day.



                                      2
    b.      That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed in
Petitioner’s naval record.


    c.      That, upon request, the Veterans Administration be informed
that Petitioner’s application was received by the Board on 30 June 2002.

4.    It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board’s review and
deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the
Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
      <:~ ~—
ROBERT D. ZSALMAN      ALAN E. GOLDSMITH
Recorder    Acting Recorder


5.    Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulation, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing
corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been
approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.



























                                      3

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00631-10

    Original file (00631-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her general characterization of service issued on 25 October 1991, be changed to an honorable discharge. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that she was issued an honorable discharge on 25 October 1991 vice...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05430-99

    Original file (05430-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Y 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 203704100 TRG Docket No: 7 July 2000 5430-99 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD OF (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Petitioner enlisted in the Marine Corps on 6 June 1973 She then served without any disciplinary actions at age 18. until her discharge. She was issued a general discharge on 30 i' Character of service when an individual is discharged due to pregnancy is based,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 11354-07

    Original file (11354-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TUJR Docket No: 11354-07 19 November 2008 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF Wi Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. The Board especially notes that Petitioner's conduct and proficiency averages met the requirements for a fully honorable characterization of service. c. That, upon request, the Department of Veterans Affairs be informed...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00626-05

    Original file (00626-05.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 626-05 24 October 2005 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF ~ Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Shortly after the conviction by SPCM, on 31 July 1960, Petitioner received adverse marks of 1.0 and 3.4 in conduct and proficiency, respectively. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07438-01

    Original file (07438-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF T H E NAVY T JR Docket No: 7483-01 24 April 2002 From : To : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD - (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the characterization of her...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01582-01

    Original file (01582-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better characterization of service than the separation under honorable conditions and the subsequent general discharge. A retired Marine colonel states that Petitioner is a good citizen and he believes an injustice was done in this case. 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 09671-09

    Original file (09671-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5106 TIR Docket No: 9671-09 22 July 2010 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To; Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OF.g@ Ref: fa) 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 with attachments (2) Case summary (3) Subject's naval record 1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a Former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06981-07

    Original file (06981-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, applied to this Board requesting an honorable characterization of service vice the under honorable characterization of service that was issued on 29 May 1967.2. The Board is aware that during the time of Petitioner’s service, an honorable characterization of service was normally conditioned upon minimum proficiency and conduct mark averages of 3.8 and 4.0, respectively.CONCLUSION:Upon...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 04329-11

    Original file (04329-11.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that the general characterization of his discharge of 20 January 1952 be changed. The Board, consisting of Mr. Dixit, Mr. Pfeiffer and Ms. Henkel, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 15 February 2012 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08378-02

    Original file (08378-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by changing the general discharge, reason for discharge, and the RE-3C reenlistment code issued on 27 October 1987. Petitioner's conduct and A minimum However, '10" given upon the initial Without the mark of zero, h. Applicable directives authorize the assignment of an RE-3C reenlistment code to an individual...