Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06770-01
Original file (06770-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

LCC: ddj
Docket No: 6770-01
15 January 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1070 Pers 3  
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

12E/43 of 1 November 2001, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
COMMAND

PERSONNEL 

NAVY 

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000

1070

From: Commander, Navy Personnel Command
To:
Via: Assistant, Board for Correction of Naval Records (Pers-OOZ)

Executive Director, Board for Correction of Naval Records

Subj: ADVISORY OPINION ICO

Ref:

(a) DD Form 149 dated 23 Aug 01

1. Reference (a) states that the rating at the time of discharge should be as a Gunner’s
Mate Third Class instead of a 

Mineman Third Class.

2. The member’s service record shows that he completed a course of instruction in
Gunner’s Mate Class “A” School on 5 August 1944. While at the school, his rating
changed from 
instruction at the Naval Mine Warfare School on 3 October 1944. On 16 February 1945 his
rating changed from 

c(GM). He was then transferred where he completed a course of

Sic (GM) to 

S2c to S 1 

MN3c 
.

3. After reviewing the member’s service record, it is our opinion that the rating of 
the time of discharge on 18 February 1946 is correct

MN3c at

By direction



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05089-01

    Original file (05089-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an ofticial naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or In this regard, it is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 09735-06

    Original file (09735-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    9735-06 19 Feb 07This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 1552.A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 February 2007. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04947-01

    Original file (04947-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In its review of your application, the Board conducted a careful search of your records for any evidence that would show that you received treatment for injuries suffered as the result of your ship hitting a mine. be eligible for the Purple Heart Medal, an individual must have been wounded or received injuries as a result of action against an enemy of the United States. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07621-00

    Original file (07621-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 5420 Ser Pers 402 of 3 1 January 2001, a copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. was approved for Star re- “C” school sometime during that 8 March 1996 SNM requested and was granted an OTEIP extension On USS Dubuque.

  • CG | BCMR | Advancement and Promotion | 2006-097

    Original file (2006-097.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated January 11, 2007, is signed by the three duly appointed APPLICANT’S REQUEST AND ALLEGATIONS The applicant, who on September 22, 2005, enlisted in the Coast Guard as a sea- man (SN; pay grade E-3) with prior active service in the U.S. Army, asked the Board to correct his record to show that he is a gunner’s mate first class (GM1; pay grade E-6). CGRC stated that during the applicant’s enlistment processing, he “expressed a strong desire to enlist on active duty...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04242-05

    Original file (04242-05.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your brother’s naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Official record reviews indicated member’s appointment to CM 2/C effective 01 March 1943. This is an advisory memorandum for the use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05330-01

    Original file (05330-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Evaluation Review Board Personnel Management Division Manpower and Reserve Affairs Department By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps 2 NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS DEPARTMENT OF THE 3280 RUSSELL ROAD QUANTICO, VIRGINIA 22134-5103 IN REPLY REFER TO: 1070 MIFD 'AUG 0 i,jbi I, MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF SERGEANT SMC application with supporting documents has been reviewed concerning his...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07191-02

    Original file (07191-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The petitioner were issued orders on 20 February 2001 from the Enlisted Personnel Management Management Center New Orleans, LA to The return to active duty for disenrollment from petitioner reenlisted on 10 July 2001 for six years and received a zone "B" SRB entitlement for NEC 3354. the' NROTC Program. d. The petitioner request to receive all SRB installments and "C" School for the previous reenlistment prior to entering guaranteed the BOOST Program. However, the member is In view of the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05470-01

    Original file (05470-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by NPC memorandum which is attached. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3 .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02263-01

    Original file (02263-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Recommend the petitioner's advancement to Petty recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the...