NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05997-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05999-00
I A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. honorable discharge the expiration of enlistment, you were The Board noted your contention implies that you have been denied It appears veterans medical benefits because of your discharge. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06007-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06010-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reported for active duty 13 June 199 1. The Board, consisting of Messrs.. Pfeiffer, Tew, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06012-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and on 28 March 1958 you received an undesirable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06016-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 ELP Docket No. 6016-01 8 February 2002 Dear
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06017-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06025-01
1552 Encl : (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments Series of Documents Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to the Navy College Fund (NCF). The Board, consisting of Messrs: Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Harrison, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06026-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Subsequently, you were processed for separation by reason of convenience of the government due to \\pregnancy or childbirth." Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06028-00
As reflected in enclosure record as he requested, but modified it by removing the following RS verbiage: qualified for promotion at this time but.. mark in item 19 from “NA” to “yes.” .” Also, as shown in enclosure (2), the HQMC PERB did not remove this report from Petitioner ’s “He is not (3), they changed the g* The fifth contested fitness report, for 28 June to 20 July 1985 (Tab E), from a third RS, also documents only that the following be deleted from the RS comments: Petitioner Is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06028-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06029-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The petitioner has received the benefits of the extension by accepting the PCS orders and completing the transfer to the new command. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the 3. use by the Board for correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06030-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06039-00
6039-00 9 February 2001 -_ Dear- This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United Board for Correction of Navy A three-member panel for the Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. that the Navy's diagnosis of a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06039-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. convicted by SPCM of the four specifications of disobedience and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 75 days, a $744 forfeiture of pay, reduction to discharge (BCD). 1978 you were convicted by SPCM of two periods...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06042-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his reenlistment was in a tax free zone and that his Selective Reenlistment Bonus be adjusted accordingly. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Pfeiffer, and Harrison, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and, pursuant to its...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06053-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted and was advanced under the provisions of the Selective Training and Reenlistment (STAR) program. The Board, consisting of Mr. Beckett, Ms. McCormick, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 17 September 2002 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06054-02
S MEH:ddj Docket No: 6054-02 16 October 2002 DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06056-02
The petitioner has provided nothing to support his claim of injustice or that he was denied an opportunity to appeal the NJP (i.e., NJP occurred and was correctly recorded via the performance evaluation system. However, Petitioner did not appeal his punishment and does not claim that he was denied the right to do so. it is the NJP However, offenses.- C .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06057-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The report stated that you were not -- On 22 April 1992 you were convicted by special court-martial of use of marijuana in February apparently based on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06065-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were so discharged on 16 February Thereafter, the discharge authority Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to an individual separated by reason of erroneous enlistment. Both You claim...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06065-02
provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a ber in the Navy, filed an application with ng that her reenlistment code be changed to . The Board excellent service, RE-4 reenlistment reenlistment due t Board believes tha reenlistment code less restrictive R recruiters that he reenlistment is au The Board further should be filed in undl reviewers will reenlistment code. Given the circumstances, the ncludes that this Report of Proceedings 'etitioner's naval record so that all future stand the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06068-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC: yrj Docket No: 6068-02 13 August 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy j:-,,-_ ._I -. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Housing (BAH) for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06071-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 607 22 November 2002 l-02 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he was not in an excess leave...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06072-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 January 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06073-01
The Board noted that an RE-3P reenlistment code is the most favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulatory guidance for individuals discharged due to a physical disability. thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your Accordingly, your application has been reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06073-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. commissioned officer in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected by transferring retirement points from the excess in a qualifying year into a nonqualifying year so that she may qualify for reserve retirement in the future. A review of the Career Retirement Credit Report (CRCR) shows that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06074-99
the opinion recommended that Petitioner receive a general discharge but no change to the RE-4 reenlistment code. CONCLUSION: Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, the Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants partial relief. In view of the foregoing, the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the following corrective action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06078-01
6078-01 7 January 2002 From: To: Subj: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD OF Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his reenlistment code be changed. In this regard, the Board notes that Petitioner had only a single NJP for a relatively...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06079-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 25 May 1977 you submitted a written request for an other than honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for Prior to submitting this an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06087-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 30 October 6087-01 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to the Navy College...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06087-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner signed his Officer Appointment Acceptance and Oath of Office prior to 9 June 2000. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 19 November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06092-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show orders reassigning Petitioner to Milton, FL were issued no later than 2 January 2002. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Agesti, Frankfurt, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 16 July 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06097-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2003. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06100-01
considered your application on After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. That form shows The statement of service also shows that you continued to serve in the Air Force Reserve until you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 22 April 1996. Although an Air Force separation document states that your military obligation termination date was 30...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06100-02
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments Series of Documents Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, in effect, that the applicable naval record be 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show promoted when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. allegations of error and injustice on 24 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06102-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 January 2991. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06104-02
I3oard 2oo0, 2001 or 2002 Reserve Lieutenant Colonel Selection After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Because this material was used in the board's decision to current date of selection on the FY03 licable material in his Lieutenant Colone The selection process and date of rank assignment of a 4. regularly scheduled board is different...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06105-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC memorandum is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06108-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 HD: hd Docket No: 06 108-02 4 November 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: LC Ref: Encl: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD S (a) Title 10 U.S.C. They recommended against a special board for the FY 03 f. The memorandum for the record at enclosure (4) documents that a representative of the Bureau of Naval Personnel Petitioner’s record to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06109-01
The punishment imposed was a $400 Your record further reflects that on 14 May 1984 you received NJP for 20 specifications of wrongful possession of marijuana and were awarded extra duty for 45 days, a reduction in rate, and a $600 forfeiture of pay. Given all the circumstances of your case, the Board However, the Board concluded these factors and The Board noted that you submitted no evidence to and the records contains no such Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06112-01
should be corrected by removing that period of lost time from his record. The Board notes that the period 11 June to 15 July 1999 is consistent with a period of pretrial confinement that is properly charged as lost time, given the subsequent court-martial conviction on 15 July 1999. concludes that a removal of this period of lost time is not warranted. Therefore, the Board RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing from a. the record any documentation showing...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06113-01
6113-01 7 January 2002 Dear This is in reference to your naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United considered your application on Your allegations of error and injustice were A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, 3 January 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The facts On...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06113-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 February 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06115-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show Petitioner signed her Officer Appointment Acceptance and Oath of Office for commissioning into the Naval Reserve on the date she graduated from medical school. Gilbert, McCormick, and Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06116-02
This was his second failure of selection for promotion to commander. The FY 03 Supply Corps (SC) Commander Selection Board convened on 11 March 2002. the Fleet the Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN CASE OF FLEET SUPPORT OFFICERS’ REDESIGNATION TO SUPPLY CORPS (‘ommunity ManageI- From: Sent: To: Subject: SNET.Navy.Mil] ORIGINAL OPINION is email as authority to withdraw PERS-80 original opinion not recommending relief for the following officers: After reviewing the HRO...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06118-01
That board is authorized to change both the reason for discharge and the characterization of service. to that board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06118-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06122-01
Ms. Humberd, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. The enlisted performance record (page 9) shows that in the four evaluations after the NJP Petitioner received no marks below 3.0 in any category and the lowest overall evaluation was 3.2 In the evaluation for the period ending 30 June 1995 he was . The Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06122-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...