DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
MEH:ddj
Docket No: 6028-01
8 January 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 811 of 18 October 2001, a copy of which is
attached.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY
5720
MILLINDTON TN
CERSOWNEL COMMAND
INTEDRITY DRIVE
2.05
5-0000
1160
PERS-811
18
Ott 01
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Ref:
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd
03 Jun 01
(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
050/00
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval to the
a.
The petitioner reenlisted on 02 October 2000 for six
"B" SRB entitlement for the ET(OOOO)
years and received a zone
rate.
b.
The petitioner originally received the zone
"B" SRB
approval on 08 September 2000 for the award level of 4.0 at the
maximum of
upon the date of reenlistment, the
petitioner's zone
2.0 award level with a total amount of
However,
"B" SRB entitlement was adjusted to reflect a
$22,690.64.
$45K.
C .
$45K maximum.
The petitioner requests correction in SRB pay to reflect
Reference (b) listed the zone
the
entitlement for the
for service members whose branch class 11 (USN).
reference
(USNR) at award level 2.0.
which he is a USNR(TAR) service member.
(b) listed the zone
Additionally,
"B" entitlement for branch class 32
The petitioner's branch class is 32
ETSW(OOO0) rate with an award level of 4.0
"B" SRB
d.
The petitioner is only eligible for the zone "B" SRB
entitlement offered to the USNR(TAR) service members.
In view of the above,
2.
remain as is.
recommend the petitioner's record
This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by
3.
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
(1) is returned.
Enclosure
&$.,.
*
I
‘:
enlistment
Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05222-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations BUPERS opinion furnished by which is attached. only offers the SRB to members with Branch Class 11 USN. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 3.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03259-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 mh MEH: Docket No: 9 July 2002 3259-02 Dear This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the Ilnitctl States Code, section 1552. iOr correcticm 01‘ your naval record pursuant to the ot‘ the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive panel three-nlember- A session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with proceedings of this Board. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08414-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 March 2001. recommend no change to the The petitioner and received the zone reenlisted on 09 August 1999 for four years "B" SRB maximum of $30K for the FC rate. recommend the petitioner's record remain This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 06397-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Reference (d) provided a zone “A” SRB award level of 1.5 for the PR rate at the time of the member’s reenlistment. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09430-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 06491-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2000. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend disapproval of - Petitioner reenlisted on 20 Sep 99 for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04332-01
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 20 August 2001, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (b) listed a zone "B" SRB entitlement for the GSM rate with an award of 1.5 at the time the petitioner signed the 36 months extension.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04418-03
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the AT (TAR) rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Harrison, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 26 August 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08280-01
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 811 of 30 January 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner had orders to CTR "A" school with a class 3. convening date of 22 May 01 and a projected graduation date of 26 September 2001. graduated early and reenlisted...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06038-11
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter -yveferred to as Petitioner, Filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR vice USN. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. George, and Mr. Exnicios, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 11 July 2011 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...