NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06123-02
Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has directed that the report for 12 July 1997 to 31 July 1998 be modified by removing the “Exercises acceptable judgment and following from the reporting senior (RS) comments: leadership.” Petitioner further requested removal of his failure of selection before the Fiscal Year (FY) 2003 Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board, so that he will be considered by the selection board next convened to consider officers of his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06124-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06127-02
A three-member p session, considered your injustice were reviewed in to the proceedings of this your application, together opinion furnished by NA copy of which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of ith all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and RUITCOM memorandum 1133 Ser 32/6197 of 4 October 2002, a In addition, the Board considered the advisory n of the entire record, the Board found that the cient to establish the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06131-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The separation program designator (SPD) On 18 June 1986 you were notified At that time, you elected to waive On 23 June 1986 the separation authority The Board believed that your inability to adapt to the Marine Corps was sufficient to support separation by reason of entry level performance...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06132-02
1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments NPC memorandum of 16 August 2002 Subject’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject 1. to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) former spouse coverage under the insurable interest category, and then elected former spouse coverage under the spouse category. ’s former spouse, hereinafter...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06133-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel 2 extension agreements. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, allegations of error and injustice on 16 October determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06136-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 May 2003. A minimum average conduct mark of 3.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06138-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETS W rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Harrison, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06140-02
1552 (1) DD Form 149 dtd 9 Jul 02 w/attachments (2) HQMC MIFD memo dtd 16 Aug 02 (3) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 la ( dated 12 July 1999. the RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 1 la (“Aftinistrative...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06142-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06144-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. than others separated from the Navy for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the 4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06149-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. The first notes the 12 May 1984 NJP and your On 7 December 1984 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 0616-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. A minimum average conduct mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06162-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, the Board concluded these factors and contention were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06172-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6172-02 13 November 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. petitioner's request.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06174-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 5he Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06177-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone Bonus (SRB) for the OS rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Harrison, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, allegations of error and injustice on 29 October determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06178-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JLP: ddj Docket No: 6178-O 7 March 2001 From: Chairman, To: Secretary of the Navy Board for Correction of Naval Records _“. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that the reenlistment of 26 Janaury 2000 is in Time in Rate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06179-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. received NJP for failure to go to your appointed place of duty, and assault. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06182-01
Based on the diagnosed personality disorder, you were processed for an administrative separation by reason of erroneous enlistment. separated for that reason, the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RR-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06183-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. YOU are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06184-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 January 2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06186-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show that his service was characterized as honorable, and that he was retired vice discharged by reason of misconduct. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Shy and Zsalman reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 25 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06189-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the VA rated all conditions it classifies as by or merely traceable to a period of military service, the military departments assign ratings only in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06201-02
The Board, consisting Petitioner’s allegations of e regulations, determined tha recorc available evidence of enclosures, naval records, ; Mr. Beckett, Mr. Kim, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed or and injustice on 7 January 2003 and, pursuant to its he corrective action indicated below should be taken on the Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the d applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In of all the evidence of record, : Board finds the existence of an injustice...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06211-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations. so discharged on 13 November 1998. reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code You were You were not recommended for You have provided evidence that since discharge, you have completed an alcohol rehabilitation program. Consequently, when applying for a correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06214-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC: lc Docket No: 62 14-02 24 September 2002 From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy FORMER MEMBER REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) (1) (2) (3) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06215-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 4 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06222-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he declined enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Mr. Cooper, Mr. Milner, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 February 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06230-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to modify an extension agreement. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Harrison, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06234-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After review by the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06237-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. In your application, you are requesting that the record be corrected to shows that you were eligible for sanctuary protection under the provisions of Title 10...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06239-01
Enclosures DEPARTMENT OF THE N AVY P E R S ONNEL COMMAN 5720 INTEGRITY DRIV MILLINGTON TN 38055000 NAV Y E D 0 1610 PERS-3 11 17 December 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS/BCNR Coordinator (PERS-OOZCB) Subj: E Ref: (a) BUPERSINST 16 10.10 EVAL Manual Encl: (1) BCNR File 1. The member requests his promotion recommendation be changed on his performance evaluation for the period 1 March 1998 to 1 September 1999. The report in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06241-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that he elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. McPartlin, Norvello, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 15 January 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06242-01
conduct mark of 3.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. In this regard, no law or military regulation the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to your three nonjudicial punishments as well as the fact that your conduct average was insufficiently high to warrant a fully honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06249-00
The promotion would have been effective 1 May 1998: however, the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC), deleted his name from the selection list on 15 April 1998. Board concluded this Marine's record was outstanding enough to influence and convince CMC, MMEA-85 to waive the alcohol related Petitioner incident of 6 December 1997 and approve the waiver. Accordingly, the Board recommends the following corrective _- action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06249-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06254-01
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 Y S LCC:ddj Docket No: 6254-01 20 February 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CMC memorandum is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06257-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06258-00
A three-member panel for the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 February 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. your contentions were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of three a deck court and a summary court-martial, and failure to received the require average in conduct. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06259-01
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In and your unauthorized absences this regard, individuals discharged by reason of misconduct often receive other than honorable discharges. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06259-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the STG rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06262-00
The attached memorandum for the record dated 12 January 2001 reflects that this code has been removed. In addition, the Board (PERB), considered the report of the HQMC Performance Evaluation Review Board 8 December 2000, a copy of which is attached. 103 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: Ref: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) HE CASE OF STAFF SMC .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06263-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. On 2 March 1975 Your military record shows that you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court- martial for the foregoing period of absence of about seven years. The Board concluded that your discharge was proper as issued and no change is warranted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06264-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to an increased amount of zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the FC rating. The Board, consisting of Mr. Pfeiffer, Mr. Tew, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 16 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06270-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 SMC BJG Docket No: 6270-02 15 August 2002 Dear Co10 This is in reference to your provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has removed the following from the reviewing officer ’s comments in the contested section K of your fitness report for 1 July 2000...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06272-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the discharge under honorable conditions issued on 6 April 1946. Shy, Mr. Roberts and Ms. LeBlanc reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 8 January 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06278-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 22 July 2003. The letter of 27 March 1986 that notified you that the request was denied stated that your "statements clearly demonstrate that your request for discharge (was) based on dissatisfaction with the naval service and not by reason of conscientious objector beliefs." Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06281-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected to show a more favorable type of discharge than the general discharge issued on 21 July 1977. In this regard, benefits would only been granted if the discharges were recharacterized using traditional standards by the discharge review boards or the boards for correction of military records. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06282-00
You continued to serve in the Marine Corps and whea you You were honorably discharged on During this period you Individuals discharged for unsuitability received the type of Character of service discharge warranted by the service record. The Board also noted your In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and immaturity, subsequent honorable service in Vietnam in which you were twice wounded in combat, and your...