DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 6073-01
15 January 2002
Your allegations of error and
Dear
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 9 January 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 15
November 1989 after more than nine months of prior active service
You apparently served without incident
in the Naval Reserve.
until 26 February 1993, when a medical evaluation recommended
that you be discharged due to patellafemoral stress syndrome. On
6 July 1993 you were honorably discharged by reason of physical
disability.
RE-3P.
The Board noted that an RE-3P reenlistment code is the most
favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulatory guidance for
individuals discharged due to a physical disability.
thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your
Accordingly, your application has been
reenlistment code.
denied.
furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
At the time you were assigned a reenlistment code of
The Board
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01636-00
You were honorably discharged on You state in your application that your knee has healed and you desire to reenlist. In support of your case, you have submitted Regulations only allow for the assignment of an RE-3P or an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged due to a physical disability. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9393 14_Redacted
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. You did not respond in a timely manner and were honorably discharged from the TDRL program, and assigned an RE-3P (physical disability) reentry code. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant a change in your reentry code given the fact you were offered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08322-00
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your honorable service and your contention that your narrative reason for separation and reenlistment code are administrative errors because you served without any disciplinary actions. Accordingly, your application has been This disorder constituted a physical the narrative reason for separation is an RE-3P reenlistment code was Given all the circumstances of The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05199-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04271-07
the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You were released from four years of active duty in the Marine Corps on 25 January 2002. At that time, you were assigned an RE—3P...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 10846-07
On 3 April 1993 you were honorably discharged by reason of a physical disability which existed prior to your enlistment in the Navy. authorized if you can As indicated, the record shows that you had a seizure disorder and were properly discharged from the Navy. Since you were properly discharged and have received the least restrictive reenlistment code authorized by the regulations the Board could not find an error or injustice in the assignment of the RE-3P reenlistment code.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07256-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 3 March 1987, you reenlisted in the Navy at age 25. On 6 January 1988, the Disability Evaluation...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 06935-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 April 2011. The diagnosis of your knee condition was changed to chondromalacia patella (CMP), and you were recommended for discharge because knee pain which interfered with your ability to perform your duties as a recruit. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04005-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 September 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. At the time you The Board noted that an RE-3P reenlistment code is the most favorable reenlistment code authorized by regulatory guidance for individuals discharged due to a physical condition existing prior to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05542-97
waiver for enlistment in July 1989 but also had five or more At this time you were recurrent episodes since that time. The medical report noted, in Your record On 14 June 1990 a medical board diagnosed you with recurrent herpes The board noted that a simples keratitis of the right eye. you were so separated and assigned an On 3 July 1990 RR-3P reenlistment code.