Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06017-02
Original file (06017-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                           DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
                    BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
                                2 NAVY ANNEX
                          WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100


                                                     WMP
                                                     Docket No: 6017-02
                                                     24 February 2003









  This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval
  record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code
  section 1552.

  A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records,
  sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 February
  2003. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance
  with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
  proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board
  consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in
  support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
  and policies.

  After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the
  Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the
  existence of probable material error or injustice.

  The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 3 August 1992 for four
  years at age 18. On 12 April 1993 you received a psychological evaluation
  due to claustrophobia and were diagnosed as having a dependent and anti-
  social personality disorder. It was recommended that you be expeditiously
  processed for administrative separation due to the risk of harm to
  yourself and others.

  On 16 April 1993 you were counseled concerning your performance and
  conduct and warned that further deficiencies could result in disciplinary
  action or administrative separation.

  On 8 May 1993 you were involved in an on-base alcohol related incident,
  which resulted in your apprehension by base security









personnel. You made claims that you had been assaulted, however, a thorough
investigation found that the injuries you sustained were the result of your
own misconduct.

On 10 June 1993 your division officer recommended that you be processed for
administrative separation due to your lack of improvement and your alcohol
related incident since the 16 April 1993 counseling. It was further
indicated that you had requested separation.

On 27 June 1993 you were notified that separation action was being
initiated for the convenience of the government due to the diagnosed
personality disorder. You were advised of and waived all of your procedural
rights. On 2 July 1993 you were honorably discharged and assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code.

Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 or RE-3G reenlistment code
to an individual separated by reason of personality disorder. An RE-4
reenlistment code is often assigned if an individual is thought to
constitute a threat to himself or others. Therefore, due to the severity of
your personality disorder, the Board concluded that the RE-4 reenlistment
code was properly assigned and no change is warranted. Accordingly, your
application has been denied. The names and votes of the members of the
panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable
action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its
decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not
previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep
in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record,
the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable
material error or injustice.

                             Sincerely,



                             W.    DEAN PFEIFFER
                             Executive Director







                                      2

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07992-02

    Original file (07992-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 April 2003. As a result of this hospitalization, a psychological evaluation diagnosed you as having a borderline personality disorder with narcissistic features and alcohol dependence. It was recommended that you receive alcohol rehabilitation treatment and that you be administratively separated due to your diagnosed personality disorder.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 02458-08

    Original file (02458-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. You were assigned a reentry code of RE-4, On 3 November 1993 the Bureau of Naval Personnel informed your command that you did not qualify for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07892-01

    Original file (07892-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02040-03

    Original file (02040-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    'I A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 April 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05357-02

    Original file (05357-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Regulations state that an individual will normally receive an entry level separation during the first 180 days of continuous active military service or the first 180 days after a service break of more than 92 days of active service. You received an RE-3G reenlistment code, which is the most...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08493-01

    Original file (08493-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 April 2002. On 20 October 1995 you were notified that separation action was being initiated due to the diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10212-02

    Original file (10212-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Further, an RE-4 reenlistment code is required wher Nevertheless, the Board concluded these On 29 April 1992 your On 4 June 1992 the It further...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05393-06

    Original file (05393-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 31 October 2001 you enlisted in the Navy and served without incident until 25 April 2003, when you...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01169-01

    Original file (01169-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The Board...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 07721-07

    Original file (07721-07.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TIR Docket No: 7721-07 18 August 2008 This is in reference to naval record pursuant to the States Code, Section 1552. your application for correction of your provisions of Title 10, United A three-member panel of the Boar Records, sitting in executive se application on 12 August 2008. injustice were reviewed in accor regulations and procedures appli Board. Further, an RE-4 reenlistment code is...