Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06100-01
Original file (06100-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

ELP
Docket No. 6100-01
18 January 2002

Dear-

This is in reference to your
naval record pursuant to the
States Code, Section 1552.

application for correction of your
provisions of Title 10, United

Your allegations of error and injustice were

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records,
sitting in executive session,
16 January 2002.
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and
procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

considered your application on

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

The record reflects that you enlisted in the Alabama Air National
Guard on 31 January 1992.
The statement of service you provide
shows that you were   ordered to active duty on 20   July 1992   and
were honorably released from active duty on 24 June 1994. A
Report of Separation and Record of Service shows you were
discharged from the Alabama Air National Guard on 27 February
1995 and transferred to the Air Force Reserve.
that your military obligation termination date was 30 January
1998.

That form shows

The statement of service also shows that you continued to serve
in the Air Force Reserve until you enlisted in the Marine Corps
on 22 April 1996.
You were honorably discharged from the Marine
Corps upon completion of your required active service on 21 April
2000.
Date since there was no military obligation remaining.

Your DD Form 214 shows no Reserve Obligation Termination

The statement of service further indicates that you enlisted in
the regular Air Force on 28 November 2000 and accepted a
commission as a to second lieutenant in the Air Force Reserve on
2 March 2001.

Your contention that your Marine Corps

However, even if your

The Board conducted a careful search of your record for a
valid basis upon which to show that you were not discharged from
the Marine Corps in April 2000, but were transferred to the
Marine Corps Reserve until your enlistment in the Air Force on
28 November 2000.
However, no justification for such a change
could be found.
enlistment contract shows that you enlisted for eight years
cannot be verified from available records.
enlistment contract showed an eight year term of service, it
would be erroneous since six years is the maximum term for which
Your DD
an individual can enlist in the regular Marine Corps.
Form 214 clearly shows that you were discharged after completion
of your required active service.
Therefore, it was reasonable
for the Board to conclude that your enlistment was for four years
The Board also noted the letter from Air Force
of active serve.
Personnel Center to Headquarters,
Marine Corps which states that
individuals entering military service after June 1984 incurred an
eight-year obligation and that your DD Form 214 should reflect
you were transferred to the Marine Corps reserve since you still
The individual writing that letter
had a military obligation.
apparently was not aware of your prior Air Force service.
Although an Air Force separation document states that your
military obligation termination date was 30 January 1998, that
date also appears to be erroneous since the military obligation
has been eight years since 1984,
and eight years from the date
you first enlisted in the Alabama Air National Guard would have
been 30 January 2000.
discharge from the Marine Corps.
was completed prior to your discharge, there was no basis to
release you from active duty and transfer you to the Marine Corps
Individuals do not incur a
Reserve instead of discharging you.
In order for
new military obligation with each new enlistment.
you not to have a break in service,
you would have had to enlist
in the Marine Corps Reserve or another branch of service at the
time of your discharge.
military record, you must show to the satisfaction of the Board
that the record is in error or that you were unjustly treated by
the Marine Corps.
would satisfy that requirement.
has been denied.
will be furnished upon request.

You have failed to submit any evidence that
Accordingly, your application

Further, both dates expired prior to your
Since your military obligation

In order to justify correction of a

The names and votes of the members of the panel

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.

You are entitled to have

2

the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04448-02

    Original file (04448-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    He states e. Attached to enclosure (1) is an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps which states that a nonmandatory participant cannot be retained in the Selected Marine Corps Reserve solely for the purpose of administrative discharge processing if the member requests a transfer to the IRR. In cases Therefore, Petitioner's record should be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 20 March 2000 but transferred to the IRR and continued to serve in the grade of SGT until he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07036-99

    Original file (07036-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    was not done in Petitioner's case and he had no status in the Marine Corps reserve after 7 April Through administrative error this According to Petitioner 1997. the message from Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) authorizing separation pay stated that he should not be authorized a reserve It is unclear from the record why this was done, but contract. If given such status the comments concerning his However, the advisory opinion does not Given his overall good record and the other the Board...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2003 | 2003088498C070403

    Original file (2003088498C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 March 1978, he enlisted in the U.S. Army Reserve. Army Regulation 135-155 (Army National Guard and Army Reserve Promotion of Commissioned Officers and Warrant Officers other than General Officers) states, in pertinent part, it requires 7 years time in grade (TIG) as a CPT to be considered for mandatory promotion to MAJ or a minimum of 4 years TIG to be eligible for consideration for a unit vacancy promotion. The Board determined that the evidence presented and the merits of this case...

  • USMC | DRB | 2010_Marine | MD1000245

    Original file (MD1000245.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVYNAVAL DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD (NDRB) DISCHARGE REVIEW DECISIONAL DOCUMENTApplicant’s Issues 1. As such, Applicant seeks correction to his narrative reason for separation and the corresponding characterization of service and re-enlistment code from the Marine Corps.The NDRB reviewed the Applicant’s issues and the discharge process. ” Additional Reviews : After a document review has been conducted, former members are eligible for a personal appearance hearing, provided...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00687

    Original file (MD01-00687.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD01-00687 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 010423, requested that the characterization of service on the discharge be changed to honorable. The applicant requested a documentary record discharge review. We have a saying in the Marines, "Once a Marine, always a Marine."

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08561-98

    Original file (08561-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    _( A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 April 1999. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Board concluded that the assigned reenlistment code in this case Accordingly, was harmless error and does not warrant removal. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03756-01

    Original file (03756-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member of the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he has no break in service. but extended his enlistment, The two The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand that there is no break in service. RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner's...

  • USMC | DRB | 2003_Marine | MD03-00938

    Original file (MD03-00938.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    MD03-00938 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030430. The Petitioner never at any time ‘just left” California or his responsibilities with the Marine Corps Reserves. Based upon the above, the Petitioner respectfully requests that this Honorable Board set aside said administrative discharge, correct petitioner’s DD-214 to reflect a discharge characterization of Honorable, reflect a separation code of FND (unqualified resignation) and a reenlistment...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03720-02

    Original file (03720-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, thereof, your naval record, and policies. Consequently,...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100010537

    Original file (20100010537.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests correction of her records to show she was awarded 17 years of constructive service credit (CSC). Although the advisory opinion credits the applicant with 1 year and 8 months of CSC for her professional experience, this credit is based on the date she received her DVM (May 1998). The evidence of record shows she was granted 4 years of CSC for her DVM, which was the maximum credit authorized for her degree.