Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06118-02
Original file (06118-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370.510

0

S

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 6 118-02
24 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 24 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 Ser N  
which is attached.

Your allegations of error and

133D/0002 13 of 30 August 2002, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was  
insufticient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

circulllstances  of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.

It is regretted that the  
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

  THE  CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION
N

2000 NAVY PENTAGO

OFFICE OF

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-200

0

S

IN REPLY REFER TO

542 0

AUG 3 0 2002

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters (PERS-OOXCB)

Subj:

Ref:

SECNAVINST 

7220.80E

Encl:

Docket Number 06118-02

EAOS (SEAOS) 20 April 2005.

On 02 January

On 15 May 2002 he extended this enlistment by 20

Forwarded, recommending disapproval.
On 21 August 1999 Petty Office

1.
2.
of four years making his Expiration of Obligated Service
August 2003.
months, making his Soft  
2001 he transferred to a non-submarine assignment with a Projected
Rotation Date (PRD) of February 2004 (April 2006 required for
continued entitlement to CONSUBPAY).
CONSUBPAY stopped due to insufficient obligated service.
May 2002 he regained eligibility to CONSUBPAY when he further
extended his enlistment by 20 months,
making his Soft EAOS  
20 August 2005.
was due to member not acquiring the necessary obligated service.
3.
administrative CONSUBPAY paragraph informing personnel to incur
the necessary obligated service prior to detaching from their sea
going command to maintain uninterrupted CONSUBPAY.

Orders for Submarine designated personnel have an

His failure to maintain eligibility for CONSUBPAY

Also on 02 January 2001 his
On 15

mtl?reenlisted  for a term

 

(EAOS)  20

(SEAOS)

Submarine Pay
Program Manager



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07179-02

    Original file (07179-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 October 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory N133D1000270 of 8 October 2002, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. action that would have enabled him to return to sea until he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03731-02

    Original file (03731-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. January 1978. member's ADSD, or January 2004 for EAOS is now 13 months past his HYT date. -Ten of the fourteen ast his PRD are months additional obligated service beyond his HYT date.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00858-06

    Original file (00858-06.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. San Diego, CA for shore duty with a Projected Rotation Date (PRD) of December 2005. lAW Ref(a) to maintain his CONSUBPAY eligibility, he needed to extend/reenlist through February...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05186-02

    Original file (05186-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 Ser which is attached. reference (,a), entitlement to CONSUBPAY stops at this point for any submarine Sailor who did not have at least 72 months of TOSS upon reaching his 12 YRGT.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08243-02

    Original file (08243-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 January 2003. Year Submarine Career Screening Gate Submarine Service Entry Date CONSUBPAY stopped on 8 February 2002. Per reference (a), reached his Petty Officer The Enlisted Master Record his actual total TOSS is 68 months.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03815-06

    Original file (03815-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Members CONSUBPAY stopped upon transfer for not meeting the requirements of Ref(a).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 05814-10

    Original file (05814-10.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 DIC Docket No. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “B” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) . Furthermore, the member's present contract obligation in accordance with the Personnel Online Listing...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR11458 14

    Original file (NR11458 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 §. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel, and issue an agreement to extend enlistment. at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above passes Tey } 4 It is certified that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06973-01

    Original file (06973-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    30 October 2001 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNP memorandum 5420 Ser which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00734-01

    Original file (00734-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    OPSUBPAY is payable to active duty naval service officers and enlisted personnel when assigned to and serving in a submarine when CONSUBPAY eligibility criteria, paragraph 4, ‘are not met (see enclosure (2)). a. OPSUBPAY when attached for duty (ACC 100) to a submarine command staff: OPSUBPAY is payable on a month-to-month basis to individuals qualified in submarines while attached for duty (ACC 100) to submarine command staffs (enclosure (8)) provide&that . To satisfy ride time...