DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX
NAVY
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
S
TRG
Docket No:
17 December 2002
6065-02
From:
To:
Subj:
Ref:
Encl:
B
Chairman,
Secretary 0
REVIEW OF N
ard for Correction of Naval Records
the Navy
VAL RECORD OF
b
(a) Title 1
U.S.C. 1552
(1) Case Su
(2) Subject
==Y
s naval record
Pursuant to th
1.
former enlisted me
this Board request
RF.-3B.
provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
ber in the Navy, filed an application with
ng that her reenlistment code be changed to
.
The Board, con
2.
Caron, reviewed Pe
on 10 December 200
correctiv
that the
available evidence
consiste
the Board
applicable statute
isting of Mr. Rothlein, Mr Lippolis and Mr.
itioner's allegations of error and injustice
and, pursuant to its regulations, determined
action indicated below should be taken on the
Documentary material considered by
of record.
of the enclosures, naval records, and
I regulations and policies.
The Board, hav
3.
to Petitioner's al
follows:
ng reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
egations of error and injustice, finds as
a.
Before ap
administrative rem
regulations within the Department of the Navy.
available under existing law and
to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all
b.
Although it appears that Petitioner's application was
not filed in a timely manner,
waive the statute of limitations and review the application on
its merits.
it is in the interest of justice to
C .
Petitioner reenlisted in the Navy on 9 February 1994 for
At that time, she had completed over seven years of
Her son was born on 20 August
On 18 July 1 97 she reported aboard the USS WASP (LHD 1).
prio.r enlistments.
he was processed for discharge due to
honorably discharged by reason of
dy of minor children" on 3 October 1997. At
ssigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.
Her
six years.
active duty on
1996.
Shortly thereafter
parenthood.
"parenthood o
that time, she was
discharge
observed, however,
excellent service
evaluatio:l indicates that her performance was not
ler previous evaluations show many years of
and she was always recommended for retention in
the Navy.
d.
Regulatio
4 reenlistment cod
cust
parenthood or
that an individual
disqualifying fact
individual is not
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and co
Board concludes th
action.
The Board
excellent service,
RE-4 reenlistment
reenlistment due t
Board believes tha
reenlistment code
less restrictive R
recruiters that he
reenlistment is au
The Board further
should be filed in
undl
reviewers will
reenlistment code.
t
RECOMMENDATION:
5 require the assignment of an RE-3B or an
when an individual is discharged by reason of
iy of minor children.
.s recommended for reenlistment except for the
.. .
icommended or eligible for reenlistment.
An RE-4 reenlistment code means an
RE-
An
RE-3B code means
rideration of all the evidence of record the
: Petitioner's request warrants favorable
lotes Petitioner's nearly 11 years of
lnd that she was apparently only assigned an
bde because she was not eligible for
parenthood.
no useful purpose is served by the RE-4
td concludes it should now be changed to the
-3B reenlistment code.
This code will alert
parenthood problems must be resolved before
lorized.
Given the circumstances, the
ncludes that this Report of Proceedings
'etitioner's naval record so that all future
stand the reason for the change in the
That Petitione:
a.
October 1997 she
w;
RE-4 reenlistment
I
s naval record be corrected to show that on 3
I assigned an RE-3B reenlistment code vice the
bde now of record.
That this Repo:
b.
naval record.
certifiec
4.
It is
review and
deliber;
complete record of
matter.
: of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's
that a quorum was present at the Board's
ions, and that the foregoing is a true and
;he Board's proceedings in the above entitled
ROBERT D.
Recorder
ZSAIMAN
.
Acting Recorder
Pursuant to th
revise1
5.
6(e) of the
Naval Records (32
delegation of
Procedures of
>de of Federal
authority set out in Section
the Board for Correction of
Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
2
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
authority of reference (a),
has been approved by the Board on
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
\=Q-'-W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
3
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 07857-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show a better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 18 February 2000. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reason for the assignment of the RE-3B reenlistment code. That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07204-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEXWASHINGTON DC 2O370-51OODocket No: 07204-06 23 January 2007From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the NavySubj: REVIEW NAVAL RECORD OFRef: (a) 10 U.S.C. Administrative discharge action was initiated by reason of parenthood. That Petitioners s naval record be corrected to show that on 9 July 2002 Petitioner was issued a RE-3B reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code actually...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02056-02
2056-02 25 March 2002 From: To: Subj: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF a_, t* Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record (4) DD Form 214 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that her reenlistment code be changed. She had no disciplinary actions during...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02760-04
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member in the Navy, filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show thata better reenlistment code than the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 27 December 1999.2. In connection with this processing, she elected to waive the right to have her case heard by an administrative discharge board. Regulations require the assignment of an RE-3B or an RE-4 reenlistment code when an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 06232-01
The majority further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner' s naval record so that all future reviewers will understand the reasons for the assignment of the RE-3B reenlistment code. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 18 December 1998 she was assigned an RE-3B reenlistment code vice the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. Since Petitioner has been treated no differently than others who failed to advance to E-3, the minority could...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04620-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted membr of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4 reenlistment code assigned on 11 June 1997. The Board, consisting of Ms. LeBlanc, Ms. Gilbert, and Mr. Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 3 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06341-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 ELP Docket No 6341-01 29 January 2002 From: To: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD 0 Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C.1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's Naval Record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10755-09
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her reenlistment code be changed. Nevertheless, she was administratively processed for separation by reason of parenthood due to her inability to comply with the NFC program. On 23 February 2004 the discharge authority, Navy Personnel Command (NPC), directed a reenlistment code of RE-3B, or a RE-4, if warranted by the service record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13656-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with Ghd Board requesting that her RE-4 reenlistment code be changed. Since an RE-3B reenlistment code is authorized by regulatory guidance for a Sailor who is separated for this reason, the Board concludes that an RE-3B reenlistment code is more appropriate than the RE-4 reenlistment code now of record. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by changing the RE-4...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02109-01
former enlisted member of the Navy, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by changing the 4 reenlistment code issued on 19 April 1985. f. Regulations allow for the assignment of an RE-3B or an RE-4 reenlistment code when an individual is discharged because of parenthood. adverse performance the Board concludes that no it is clear that the parenthood Given the circumstances, Although his command This code will The Board further concludes that this...