Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06029-01
Original file (06029-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR

  C ORRECT

2 

ION OF 

NAVY 

ANNEX

N AVAL 

RECORD

S

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

MEH: ddj
Docket No: 6029-01
15 January 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 15 January 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Pers of 4 November 2001, a copy of which is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

NAW  

PLRIOWWEL COMMAND
IMTSDRITY DRIVE

S720 

YlLLllDTOM 

TN 

38059-0000

1160
PERS-811
04 NOV 01

MEMORANDUM FOR THE
RECORDS

CHAIRMAN,

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL

Subi: BCNR PETITION

ICO

Ref:

(a) SNM'S DD Form 149 31 Jul 01
(b) MILPERSMAN 1160-040

In response to reference  

1.
the petitioner's request.

(a), recommend disapproval of

a.

The petitioner signed a NAVPERS  

1070/621  extension

Change of

Permanent
with

on 10 May 00 to acquire necessary obligated service to
accept
accordance
extension".
be cancelled prior to the operative date if the member,
through no fault of their own,
benefits for which the extension   was executed.

Station(PCS)
this is a

Conditional extensions for PCS orders can only

did not receive any of the

orders.

In
"conditional

reference

(b)

b.

The petitioner has received the benefits of the
extension by accepting the PCS orders and completing the
transfer to the new command.

C .

Although PCS orders were modified, the member did

not acquire the new OBLISERVE of OCT 2003 and was allowed
to transfer without the OBLISERVE to complete a 24 month
minimum activity tour.

In view of the above,

2 .
remain as is.

recommend the petitioner's record

This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the

3.
use by the Board for correction of Naval Records  
only.

Enclosure 

(BCNR)

(1)

is

V Reenlistment Incentives Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05956-01

    Original file (05956-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner ’s recor d This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the 3. use by the Board for...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10360-02

    Original file (10360-02.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02121-01

    Original file (02121-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02469-01

    Original file (02469-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. d. The petitioner requests clarifications of his zone "C" SRB eligibility and obliserve requirements for BUPERS orders 2340. e. Per reference (c), section (M) note 11, service members must successfully complete formal training and be designated in the new skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new skill award level. recommend the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08159-00

    Original file (08159-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08341-01

    Original file (08341-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is important Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE BUREAU OF...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00641-01

    Original file (00641-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 May 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 1 May 2001, a copy of which is attached.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03215-02

    Original file (03215-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. This was more than a month after you had reenlisted. 2. reenlistment date of 13 August 1999 to 04 October 1999 for four years.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 03248-07

    Original file (03248-07.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC Memo 1160 Ser 811/285 dtd 1 Jun 2007, a copy of which is attached.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 05392-06

    Original file (05392-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.Sincerely,W. Reference (c) provided a zone “A” SRB for NEC 8483 at the time the petitioner received orders to NEC 8483 training. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the use by the Board for correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.