NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04617-01
About 16 h. Petitioner's Fleet Reserve Transfer Authorization On that date, it appears that in accordance with 10 stated that he would complete 30 years of service on 1996. 6331, he was transferred to the Retired List upon completion of 30 years of service on active duty and in the Fleet Reserve. It is very clear from,subparagraph Accordingly, since SECNAVINST 1910.4A did not Since Petitioner's evidenced by the NJP of 11 January 1989, the Board concludes there is no justification to grant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04624-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the following recommendation concerning L. Enclosure (l), the petitioner is requesting special 3 consideration for wavier of his Date of Initial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04628-02
advise-hat the report had been " . ~ a r i n e Reported On: a. L u t Name b. In marking the comparison, consider all Marines of this grade whose professional abilities are known to you personally.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04631-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON GC 20370-5100 Ret-: (a) l‘itlcx IO tJ.S.(‘. of error The Board, and h;iving rcvi~\\~d all I‘ollows: ;IS finds iil~j~isliw, the t;ri.~\ ol‘ I-Lu~I-~~ ~1 pcrl;linin, to I’etitioner’s allegations a. Before applying to this available ~~ndtv- existing IAM’ ;LIKI hard, regulations I’ctitioner cxliaustetl all administrative remedies \i,ithin tllc Ikparlmt‘nt of ‘ be Navy.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04632-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. When informed of the recommendation, you elected to waive the right to present your case to an administrative discharge board. After review by the discharge authority, the recommendation for separation was approved and you were discharged with an other than honorable discharge by reason...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04632-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.' On 9 November 1955 the discharge authority then directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct. On 22 November The Board The Board, in its review of your entire record and application, carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as your prior honorable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04638-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 January 1985 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for larceny and were awarded a $300 forfeiture of pay, a portion of which was suspended for six months. Shortly thereafter, on 28 October 1987, you received The reduction and forfeitures were suspended for six The punishment...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04640-02
S MEH:ddj Docket No: 4640-02 17 September 2002 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : Ref: Encl : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04644-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The punishment imposed was reduction Your record further shows that you received NJP on 14 February 1985 for wrongful use of marijuana. forfeitures of $310 per month for two months, 45 days of restriction and extra...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04646-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04652-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. he Page 13 entry on her MGIB...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04662-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show reenlistment in paygrade ES vice E4. The Board, consisting of Mr. Partlin, Ms. McCormick, and Ms. Gilbert, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04663-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 7 February 1958 you received NJP for failure to The punishment imposed was The punishment imposed was a reduction you were convicted by summary court-martial On 22 February 1958, of two instances of breach of the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04665-02
” references to NJP, rather than completely removing the was set aside, there is no indication that the marks on aits or the promotion recommendation were made solely based d. In correspondence (3), the NPC office having cognizance over mmended removing the entire contested fitness report, stating fitness report matters has r “In view of the member ’s JP being set aside, the member ’s performance trait marks and ” promotion recommendation are now considered inappropriate. ’s record. In...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04666-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 J1,P:yri Docket No: 4666-02 18 June 2002 From To : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy St~t?i: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD -. in effect, that tlie applicable naval record be corrected to show promotion to a higher paygrade.. 2. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all tlie evidence of record, and especially in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04673-02
1552 (1) DD Form 149 dtd 30 Apr 02 (2) PERS-80 memo dtd 10 Jul 02 (3) Subject ’s naval record w/ref (a) Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show his lieutenant commander date of rank and effective date as 1 October 2001, the date he would have been assigned but for delay of his Senate confirmation. The Board, consisting of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04674-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that she elected to participate in the MGIB Program when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Neuschafer, Milner, and Brezna, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 04 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04677-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative of this regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings Board. However, the record does not reflect that any day- Subsequently, you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for participating in the homosexual acts. concluded...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04678-02
S HD: hd Docket No: 8 August 2002 04678-02 DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: LC REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD USN Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner, Schultz and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 8 August 2002, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04684-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your lengthy period of UA and your failure to complete the alternate service required for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04684-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETS W rating t 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Exnicios, Harrison, and Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04688-02
mcl regulations u~ithin the CONCLUSIO N LJpon review and consideration contents of elxlosiire the following corrective action. 01‘ all the t~vidc‘ncc‘ of‘ Boar-d finds the existence record, ot‘ an and especially in light of the ili.justice warranting the RECOMh4ENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record ElectionFotm participate in the (DD Form I3 r\?Gl 2.366) I’rogr;1nl. corrcctc‘tl.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04691-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 February 2001. 20350-2000 N S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/olU0045 12 Peb 2001 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #04691-00 with microfiche service record 1. D.C. 20350-200 N COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION USN, IN THE CASE OF PETTY The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04691-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TRG Docket No: 15 November 2002 4691-02 Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy RECORD OF (a) Title 10 U.S.C. that her separation was involuntary, and she would be entitled to 29 months of MGIB benefits. including her good record of service and the fact that she was within 27 days of qualifying for MGIB, the Board concludes that Petitioner's SPD should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04695-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 31 March 1975 your request for discharge was approved by the discharge authority. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04698-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. As a result of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04699-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by the Chief of Naval Operations dated 29 May 2001, a copy of which is attached. 04699-01 of 26 ( 1 ) BCNR File (2) Service Record CASE OF July 2001 As requested by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04700-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04701-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone FC rating (NEC 1332). “C” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the 2. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04705-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. that you received the benefit of your bargain when your request for discharge was granted and should not be permitted to change The Board concluded that your discharge was proper as it now. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04707-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, the Board concluded that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge due to the seriousness of stealing personal property from a shipmate. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04708-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. the It noted that the decision of the Board, in a previous case, to upgrade Mr. B... Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04717-00
You requested that your record be corrected to show that you were separated from the Marine Corps Discharge under Honorable Conditions ”. with a “Medical A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 January 2002. After consulting with counsel, you waived your right to consideration of your case by an administrative discharge board.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04718-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this materi'al considered by the Board consisted Board. of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The On 31 May 1966 The...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04726-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting session, considered your application on 5 September 2002. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In my opinion, the patient likely has mild asthma.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04727-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 2 July 1954 you received NJP for three The punishment imposed was 14 The On 13 October 1955 you were convicted by a special court martial of unauthorized absence from 30 August to 17 September 1955, a period of 19...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04736-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04738-01
The Petitioner appears to have suffered clinically from a Schizoid Personality Disorder since childhood, Paranoid Schizophrenia approximately eight years after his administrative separation from the Navy via a Board of Medical Survey. was admitted to Navy station Hospital tarily had not talked or moved secondary to not wanting #3002. and that the best diagnosis for his difficulties at this time is that of bipolar disorder, mixed type.” Dr. Plattner also noted that the veteran is “severely...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04739-02
opinion furnished by NAVCRUITCOM memorandum copy of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Correction of Naval Records only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04741-02
to as Petitioner, 2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. ‘McBride, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 08 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. ROBERT D. ZSALMAN Recorder G. L. ADAMS Acting Recorder Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures 5. of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04743-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to promotion to a higher paygrade. Ms.Gilbert, reviewed 3. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No: 4743-02 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show promotion to paygrade E2 effective 13 August 2001. a.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04749-02
The punishment imposed was confinement for five days with You were sentenced to confinement for The On 4 February 1943, you received NJP for manufacturing and selling liberty passes and disrespect to a commissioned officer. The punishment imposed was confinement for five days with bread and water. On 15 March 1943 you were convicted by a SCM of a 22 day period of unauthorized absence, You were sentenced to a bad conduct discharge (BCD).
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04754-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve, vice being discharged with disability severance pay. The Therefore, given the requirements of the Uniform Retirement Date Act, the record should be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 29 August 2000...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04759-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. contract required...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04764-01
The command investigation recommended that CAPT 0 be the subject of a non-punitive letter of caution since he knew or reasonably should have known that the public horseplay occurring in his platoon could develop into hazing. k. In his application, Petitioner contends that although three Further, there is no Marines received NJP for the incident at issue, one of these Marines was not reduced in rank. Lastly, the opinion noted that Petitioner indistinguisable; the By Petitioner's own did,not...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04764-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04765-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted in the Marine Corps Reserve on 4 November 2000 vice 20 October 2000. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04767-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC: yrj Docket No: 4767-02 13 August 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04768-01
The first action, You reenlisted in the Navy on 23 November 1998 and applied to the Board for additional corrective action. However, individual is advanced at a later date. you are again requesting that your reenlistment You also request The Board concluded that the two previous actions of the Board provided sufficient relief in your case.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04780-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNRC memorandum 1133 Ser is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.