Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04628-02
Original file (04628-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
D E P A R T M E N T O F  THE  NAVY 

B O A R D   F O R   C O R R E C T I O N   O F   N A V A L   R E C O R D S  

2  N A V Y   A N N E X  

W A S H I N G T O N   D C   2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0  

BJG 
Docket  No:  4628-02 
13 June 2002 

Dear  ~a- 

This is in  reference to  your  application for correction  of  your  naval  record  pursuant to  the 
provisions of  title  10 of  the  United  States Code,  section  1552. 

It  is noted  that  the  Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance  Evaluation  Section, 
Personnel Management Support Branch,  Personnel  Management Division  (MMSB-30) has 
filed a  memorandum  in  your  record  modifying  the contested fitness report  for  1 April  to 
18 June 2001  to  reflect  that  item  5.a has  been  marked,  which  indicates that  the report  is 
adverse.  It  is  further noted  that  the HQMC Perforniance  Evaluation  Review Board  (PERB) 
has processed  the  report as an  adverse evaluation. 

A three-member panel  of  the Board  for  Correction  of  Naval  Records,  sitting in  executive 
session, considered your  application on  13 June 2002.  Your allegations of error and  injustice 
were reviewed  in  accordance with  administrative  regulations and  procedures applicable to the 
proceedings of  this Board.  Documentary material considered by  the Board consisted of  your 
application,  together  with  all  material submitted in  support thereof,  your  naval record  and 
applicable statutes, regulations and  policies.  In  addition,  the Board  considered the report  of 
the PERB, dated  13 May  2002 with  enclosure, a copy of  which  is attached. 

After  careful and  conscientious consideration of  the entire record,  the Board  found that  the 
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable  material error or 
injustice.  In  this connection, the Board  substantially concurred  with  the comments contained 
in  the report of  the  PERB.  Accordingly,  your  application for  relief beyond  the modifications 
effected by  MMSB-30 and  the PERB has  been  denied.  The names and  votes of  the  members 
of the panel  will  be  furnished upon  request. 

It  is regretted  that  the circumstances of  your  case are such  that  favorable action cannot be 
taken.  You  are entitled to have the Board  I-ccuilsicler its decision upon  submission of  new  and 
material evidence or other  matter not previously  considered by  the Board.  In  this regard,  it is 
important to keep in  mind  that a presumption  of  regularity  attaches to all official records. 

Consequently,  when  applying for a correction of  an  official naval  record,  the. blirden  is on  the 
applicant to demonstrate the existence of  probable  material error or injustice. 

Sincerely, 

W.  DEAN  PFEIFFER 
Executive Director 

Enclosure 

D E P A R T M E N T ' O F   TH'E  N A V Y  

H E A D Q U A R T E R S   U N I T E D  S T A T E S   M A R I N E   C O R P S  

3 2 8 0  R U S S E L L   R O A D  

Q U A N T I C O .   V I R G I N I A   2 2 1  3 4 - 5 1  0 3  

IN R E P L Y   R E F E R   T O  
1610 
MMER/ PERB 
' ',? 
MbY 

' 

1 

MEMORANDUM  FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF 

NAVAL RECORDS 

Subj : 

MAKINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION  REVIEW BOARD  (PERB) 
ADVISORY OPINION ON  BCNK APPLICATION  IN THE CASE OF 

CAPTAI-- 

Ref: 

(a) Captain 'v DD forrr. 149 of  15 Aug  02 

(b) MCO  P1610.7E w/Ch  1-2 

USMC 

( 1 )  Finalized  Fitness Report  010401-010618  (TR) 

1 .   Per MCO 161O.11C1 the Performance Evaluation Review Board, 
with  three members present, met on 16 January 2002 to consider 
C a p t a i n T d P I I I ( I I I P C p e t i t i 0 n   contained in reference  (a) .  Removal 
cf  the fitness report for the period 010401 to 010618  (TR) 
was requested.  Reference  (b) is the performance evaluation 
directive governing submission of the report. 

2.  The petitioner  contends that the report contains derogatory 
material in Section I  (Directed and Additional Comments).  As 
such, he believes he should have been required to acknowledge 
the report by  signing Section 52 and given an opportunity to 
respond. 

3.  In its proceedings,  the PERB concluded that, as contended, 
the petitioner  should have been given an opportunity to respond 
to the adverse nature of the - - ~ o r t .  The following is offered: 

a.  Given the recent age of the report at the time the PERB 

first considered reference  (a) (seven months),  the Board  found 
that affording the petitioner the chance to respond would be a 
viable option.  That action was directed. 

b.  Subsequent to initiating referral action on 7 February 

2002, the petitioner  notified this Board that the Reporting 

d Reviewing Officer  (Lieutenant Colonel 
te the fitness report, possibly  into a 

"not observed"  a~~raisal-(~~~~ 

Chairperson) 20 confirmed the foregoing.  Based on 

that conbrr-satic 
obtain the petitioner's  rebuttal, pending  receipt of the 

)n, the PERB directed cessation of all action to 

Subj:  MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION  REVIEW BOARD  (PERB) 

ADVISORY OPINION ON BCNR APPLICATION  IN THE CASE OF 
CAPTAI 

SMC 

rewritten fltness report.  -as 
actlon was not completed  in an expedltlous manner,  action to 
obtain the petitioner's  acknowledgement/rebuttal to the report 
of record would be  reinstituted. 

advised that if this 

c.,  In an e-mail communique of 27 March  2 0 0 2 , ~  
. 

advise-hat the report had been " .   - 
with  the inadvertent wording  removed.  .  ."  and was mailed  to 
this Headquarters on/about  15 March  2002.  As of 4 April  2002 
neither the PERB nor the Fitness Report  Processing Section 
(MMSB-32) was in receipt of the rewritten report.  On that same 
date, official correspondence was again sent to the petitioner, 
allowing him the opportunity to acknowledge and respond to the 
fitness report.  He was directed to reply by  20 April 2002 and 
has not done so. 

d 

4.  The Board's  opinion, based on deliberation and secret ballot 
vote,  is that the contested fitness report should remain a part 
of captain ;official 
military record.  Please note that 
the enclosur 
obtain Capta 

the efforts by this Headquarters to 
acknowledgement and rebuttal. 

5.  The case is forwarded for final action. 

~ o l o & ~ ,  U. S. Marine Corps 
Deputy Director 
Personnel Management Division 
Manpower and Reserve Affairs 
Department 
By direction of the Commandant 
of the Marine Corps 

'USMC FI~NEsS REPORT (1610) 
NAVMC lOa35A (Rev. 9-99) (WN  2.2) 
PREVMUS EDITIONS WILL HOT BE USED 
~ h c :  c;ornpletcd fitness repor!  is the most important Information component in manpower management.  It is the primary means devaluating a Marine's 
performance and is the Commandant's primary tool for the selection of personnel for promotion, augmentation, resident schooling. command, and duty 
assignments  Therefore, the w m  letion of this report is one of an officefs  most critical responsib~tities. Inherent in this duty Is 
commitment of each 
to ensure the ~nlegrily of the ayslsm by giving close ettentlon lo sccvrate r n e r k m ~  and t m l y  mportlng.  Every 
Reporting Senlor and Rcviewng 8ki-r 
om-r 
lnfiatiinary markings only serve to dilute the actual value of each report.  Reviewing &cers  will not concur with inflated reoorts. 

serves a role In the scrupulous maintenance of this evaluation system, unimatel  important to both the individual and the Marine Corps. 

COMMANDANTIS GUIDANCE 

00 NOT STAPLE 
THIS FORM 

1.  Marine Renortad On: 

11.  Reviewing Officer: 
a.  Last Name 
CLOSE 

b. lnit c.  Service  d.  SSN 

e.  Grade 

TCOL 

1.  Duty Assignment 
BATTALION COMMANDER 

- 

-  p~ 

-- 

-Lead and train Marines  assigned to the Adjutant  section, ensuring professional 
development. 
-Supervise  the administrative process t.o  ensure efficient and correct  staffing of 
documents. 
-Supervise the administration of military  ju:;tlce  and serve as the cog:~izant staff 
officer on  legal Issues. 
-Maintain classified material as the CMCC officer. 
-Supervise  the accurate and timely publication, distribution, and revicw of directives, 
administrative matters, standard operating procedures,  reports and special awards. 
-Supervise the Battalion awards and  fitness report program. 
-Provide  the commander with  the coccept of personnel  support. 

-Supervised the professional development of new Marines and prepared  them for a major 
deployment. 
-Supervised the processing of more than 30 administrative separation pi~ckages. 
-Developed and  lmplernented a n   awards and  fitr!ess  report tracker to maniige both programs 
-Prepared  the Battalion administratively  for Operation Tandem Thrust 2001. 
-Provided the G a t t a l i ~ n  Commander with the ccmcept of personnel support. during Operation 
Tandem Thrust. 
-Coordinated the Government Travel Card Program. 
-Supervised the Battalion mail operazion. 

1. ~ a r i n e  Reported On: 

a.  L u t  Name 

b.  First Name 

c.  MI 

d.  SSN 

2. C, - A o n  and Period Covered: 
a.  OCC 

b.  From 

TO 

1  PERFORMANCE.  RosulD achkvod d u h g  me nporUng prlod. How well those duths Inherent to l Hutno's  bllW plus all bddltkrul dutlea  fomully 
id Informally aulgnmd. r*am u r r l e d  ouL  Reflects a Madne's aptitude, competence, end commitment to the unWs su-u 
Indkators are titno and resouru mmagemmt. task prloMlution, and tenacity to achlwe positlw ends c o d s h d y .  

ebove porsonal r&erd. 

uhments of billet 

duties. 

Fn%A-l 
Aptitude, commltment, and 
competence meet 
exprctruonr.  Results 
malnbln strtus quo. 

Consistently PIoduces quality results whlle 
measurably lmpmving unlt performance. 
Habitually makes effective use of time and 
resources; Improves billet procedures and 
products.  ~ o r i t l v e  Impact axtends beyond ' 
billet expectations. 

Results far rrurp~u expectatlonr.  Rocognires 
and exploits new msourcos- c r e r t n  
Emulated; sought after u ah expettw%nfluonce 
beyond unit  knp.ct  slgnHk.nt;  I n n o v ~ w  
approaches to problems produce rlgnlfkant galns 
ln quallty and erficlmcy. 

rtunltlea. 

2.  PROFICIENCY.  Demonstrates technlul knowledge and practical skill in the execution of the Marine's overall duties.  Combines hlnlng, education and 
expdence.  Translates skills into Ktl0nS which contribute to accomplirhlng tasks and missions.  Imparts knowledge to o l h m .  Grade dependent 
ADV  Com 

ten(.  Possemseo the 
r e q u r b  nnge of rklllr a d  

2g3  commensurate 

e and experience. 
Understands and articulates 
b ~ s l c  functions related to 
minsion 8ccomplishment. 

Dwnonstratcs mastery of all required skills. 
Expertise, educstlon and experience 
consistently enhance mission 
accomplishment.  Innovative troubleshooter 
and problem solver.  Effectively impam 
skills to subordinates. 

Trur exper( In fkld.  Knowledge and skills Impact 
far beyond thore of  wm. Translates 
broad-bued e d u d o n  and exprlence Into 
forward Ullnklng, Innovativs actions.  Makes 
immeasurable impact on mission accomplishmant 
Peerless teacher  selflasly  Imparts experlire to 
subordinates. &rs.  m d  u n i o n .  

NIO 

HI0 

JUSTIFICATION: 

1.  COURAGE.  Monl or physical strength to overcome danger, fear, difficulty  or anxle  .  Personal acF(Pnce  of nsponslbll  and accountabllky, plrclng 
conscience over competing interests reaardless of conseauences  Conscious. overrl$no  declslon to rlsk bodltv harm or dea%  to rccomP(bh the mission or 
save others.  Tho will t o  oekevere d e s ~ k e  uncerhintv. 
ADV  Demonstmtes inner strength 

Uncommon brav 

and wpac 

' 

M i 0  

I 

Qulded by conscience in all act~ons. Proven 
abillty to overcome danger, fear  ditficulty or 

I anxleb.  Exhibits bravew In the \ace of 
I 

I 
I 
I 

1 obstacles and IM&J  others nyhe b e  of moral 
I under the moat adverse c 6 n d l t l 6 ~ .  S e l f k r .  

dllemma or life-threatenlna danger.  Demonstrated 
Always places conuknce over competing 
interests regardless of ~ h r l c a l  or person81 
consoquanZes. 

to overcwm 

7

-

 

I 

I 

I~=%&?~%nensunte 
wtth u o ~ e  oT  d d e s  and 
rxperience.  Willln  to face 
moral or physkal cftaiknger 
in pursulfof mission 
accomplbhment. 

- 

ur.  a  m  M e  for the sltuatlon, whlle !\splaying  &ad 

2.  EFFECTNENESS UNDER STRESS.  Thinkin 
s o n s .
&DV E ~ h l b l D  dlsclpline and 
stability under pressure. 
Judgment and effective 
problemlolvlng skills are 
evldent. 

 pw&l and emotional strength, resil~ence and en&rance  are elemenfs. 
Consistently demonstrates maturity, mental 
a  llity and willpower durin  periods of 
qrovides oYder % chaos through 
&enity. 
the appl~catron of Intulbon, problem-solving 
rkllls, and leadership.  Composure reassures 
othen. 

Demonstrates ddom-matched presence of mind 
under the most demanding Circumstances. 
Sbblllms my sihmUon through the resolute and 
tlmely applkstion of dlrostlon, focus md p n o n e l  
prermce. 

functlonln  end leading effectively under conditions of 

y r l u l  andlor mental  n u u n  Melntilnlng 

purpose of actlon  enabling one to l n s p g  others whlh contlnukg to l a i d  undw adume 

on one's own accord.  Being creative, proactive and declslve.  Transforming oppOrhm&  lnto Won. 

5.  INITIATIVE. Actlon In the absence of rpecMc dlrectlon.  Seelng what needs to be done m d  acting without prom  tlng.  The lnstlnct to begin a task and 
f o l l ~ t h r o u g h  -rgdcally 
ADV  D.monnnt.s  wllllngwss to 
take action In Uw absence of 
r p u l f k  dimtion.  ~ c t r  
commensurate with grrde, 
brlnlng and experience. 

SelCmoUvrted and actionorlented. 
Foresight and energy conrlstenUy transform 
opportunity ~ n t o  action.  Develops and 
pursues creative, InnovaUve solutions.  Acts 
without prompting.  Self-starter. 

Highly motivated and proactiw.  Dlsplaya 
@xCeptlonal OWONIWSS  of s u m n d l n g s  m d  
envlronmrnt  Uncanny ablltty to mtlclpata mlrrlon 
mquirements and quickly fOrmulate orlglnal, 
far-reaching solutionr.  Alwayr taker decisive, 
effective actlon. 

JUSTIFICATION: 

6 

NIO 

NIO 

NAVMC 108353 (Rev. 9-99) (WN  2.2) 

r  - P C - 6  

1. MP& 

Reported On: 

2. Or  Jon and Porlod Covered: 

InstruCt)ona and directs 
execution.  Seeks to 
accomplish mission In ways 
that surtain motivation m d  
morale.  Actlona contribute tc 
unit effectiveness. 

direction and delegation.  Effectively tasks 
subordlnates and clearty delineates 
standards expectad.  Enhances 
performance through constructive 
supervision.  Fosters motlvatlon and 
enhances morale.  Builds and sustains 
teams that successfully meet misslon 
roquirernents  Encourages lnitlatlvo and 
candor amonq subordinates. 

Pmmotos crullvky and e n q y  among 
subordlnates by rblklng the idral balmce of 
dlroctlon a d  delrgmtlon.  k h l e v r  highest levels 
of parfonnance from 8ubordln.t~ by encouraging 
indlvldual inltlatiur.  Engendm wllllng 
subordinaUon, loyalty, and h a t  that allow 
subordlnatoe to ovareom. 
thalr parcalved 
Ilmbtlons.  Personal leadership *tors 
levels of motivation and monie, enaurlng misslon 
~ccornpllshment aven In the most dlfflcult 

hlghert 

- 

- 

!.  DEVELOPING SUBORDINATES. Commitment to train, educate, and challenge all Marinas regardlass of m a ,  nllglon, othnic back  round, or gander. 
Iontonhip.  Cultivatimr professional and Dersonal develo~ment of subordlnates.  Oeveloolna team olavars and asorit (10 corns.  ~ b l l k d  to comblna teachlntr 
~ n d  coachlna  Cmrdna an atmosphere toierant of m~stakes in the course of learnlna 
.- - 
4

. 

-

-

 

.- 
I 
I 

I Nln 
1 
'"- 

F 
n 
U 

- 

E 
n 
U 
. -   . .  
I  Develops and mstitutes InnovaUve programs,  ] 
I to include PME. that emohaslze wrsonal 
I 
and professional develdpmeG oi 
subordinates.  Challenges subordinates to 
exceed their perceived potential thereby 
enhancmg unit morale and effectiveness. 
Creates an environment where all Marines 
are confident to learn throuah trial and error. 
As a mentor, prepares rubo~dinates for 
increased responsibilities and duties. 

I  Widely racognlzad and emulated as a teacher, 
I  coach and leader.  Anv Marine would desln to  . 
serve with ~ l i s  ~arine'&auA 
they kn&they  will 
grow personally 8nd pmhssionally.  Subordlnatr 
and unit perfonnrnce far surpaasd expected 
results due to MRO'a mentonhlp and Cam 
bullding talents.  Attltude toward subordlnate 
dWel0~Inent Is infectious. extandlna bovond the 
unit. 

- .  

I 
I 

 

1

~

Malntallu an envlronmult 
~
I that allows ~ersonal and 
pmfassio&  development. 
Ensures subordinates 
participate In all mandated 
development programs. 

1.  SETTING THE EXAMPLE.  The most visible facet of leadership:  how well a Marine servas as a mla modd  r all othwr.  Personal action damonstratoa 
h. h W r t  standards of conduct, ethlcal behavior, fitness,  m d  appearance.  Bearing, demeanor, and selfd&pllno  a n  r i m r n t r .  
LDV Maintaltu Marine Corps 

atandarde for a  pearance. 
walght, and uniform w a r .  
Sustainr required level of 
phplcal fltnoaa.  Adheres to 
tha tenets of the Marine 
Corps core values. 

Personal conduct on and off duty reflects 
hi heat Marine Corps standards of 
ln!epril. 
b=aring a"d  appearance. 
Charac er IS  exceptional. Actively seeks 
selCimprovemcnt in wide-ranging aroas. 
DedlcaUon to duty and professional example 
encourage others' self-improvemenl effotts. 

Model Marine, frequently amulated.  Exemplary 
conduct, behavior, and actlons a n  toncaottlng. 
An inspiratlon to aubordlnrtor, peon, and renlorc. 
Remarkable d e d l d o n  to Improving self and 
Others. 

4 .. 

6 

ENSURING WELL-BEING OF SUBORDINATES  Genuine interest in the well-being of Marines.  Effortr enhnce subordinabs'  ability b 

0ncmtnt.lfocuS  on u n l  mlssion accomplishment.  Concern for family readiness Is Inherent  The I m p ~ M n ~ e  
~n the beiiefth8t Marines t8ke care of their own. 
,DV  D u ~  confidentfy wlth hsues 

placed on wdfrre of aubordlnatm Is b u d  

NIC) 

- 

NIO 

r#rtinenl to subordinate 
m h m  and mcognhas 
r u b b l e  c o u n r  ofactlon 
that support subordinates' 
mll-belng.  Applies avalhble 
nwurt.., 
subordinates to effectively 
concentrate on the mlsslon. 

allowlng 

Instills andlor reinforces a sense of 
responsibility among junior  Marines for 
themselves and thelr subordinates. Actively 
fosters the development of and uses support 
systems for subordinatoa whlch improve 
thelr abillty to contribute to unlt mbslon 
accom  iirhment.  Efforts to  enhance 
subodnate welfare improve the  unit's 
ability to accomplish Its mission. 

with the bsrt ruPPOfl 

. 
Notlcubly a n h m c n  suboniinateo well-klng. 
msultlng in a measurable l n c n u e  In u n l  
effoctlvenrss.  Maximkos unlt and M s a  m w f w s  
to provldr s u b o r d ~ ~  
avallabk. Prorctlw appmch w n r  to mwgh 
unlt mambon to V k e  u r n  of their own:thernby 
cormcUn  potential ~ m b k m a  boforn t h y  a n  
hinder s u % o r d l n ~  affodvonrtr.  Wldrly 
mcogntud br t.chnlqUes and pOliCle8 that 
roduce n r u b  and build m o n k .   Build8 strong 
amUy atmorphen.  Puts motto  Mlulon flfsf, 

P Msrinos ahvays, into adon. 

ti 

. COMMUNICATION SKILLS.  The efficient transmission and receipt of thoughts and Ideas that enable and e n h a w  bsdanhlp  E q w l  Imporiancr glvm b 
stoning  sperklng writing  and critlcsl reading skills.  interactive  allowin  one to perceive problems and rltuatlons, provldr eohclw ~uklrnce, and axprers 
o r ~ r ~ x ' k h a  

to ask pueaUons. nlsa Issue# W c o r m  and r n t u r o  opWom. 

In a \ o m  e & i l & u n d e r ~ t ~ ~ d  by everyone.  A l a s  shordin& 

butas to a leadets abli 
,DV Skilled in receiving m d  
conveying information. 
comrnunlcate.  offac~vsly 
perfomncn of duties. 

in 

to mobvate as well as counsel. 

Clearl  articulates thoughts and Ideas 
verbah and in writing.  ~ommun~catidn 
in all 
forms 1s accurate  Intelligent  concise  and 
timely.  communibrtes with ;larky  a d  verve, 
ensuring understandin  of Intent or p u r s e .  
Encourages and consl(?era  the contrib  tons 
of others. 

in vrrb8l comrnuniutlon. 

HI  hl  davdopod h c i l  
ing A
~ d e p r i n  corn 
hi  h u t   u a l ~ ~ o m b i n e s  
s k h  wdch WI  endor confidmcc and rchlevr 
undrntmding8mspoctivr  of tha Utting rituation. 
or s l u  of tho group 8 d d m n d   Dlr  &an 
to & o n .  
lntultlve sense of when and ho;v 

n
 docummb ofthe 
p m m c a  and verbal 

NIO 

IUSTIFICATION: 

6 

1. Marine Reported On: 

Emnnund8ntb Readlna LIst; p.rtlcl~atlon in discussion arouDs and militaw soclilies3nd Involvement In Ieernina through n k  technotwln. 

MelMIlru cumncy In 
required military rkllls and 
nlatod dowlopmnb.  Has 
complct.d or Is enrolled In 
approprl8to level of PME for 
grade and level of 
exporlence.  Ruognizes and 
undentands new and 
cnatlve approaches to 
d c e  Issues.  Remains 
l b n & t   of contemporary 

PME ouUook extends beyond MOS and 
required education.  Develops and follows r 
compnhenslve personal program which 
Includes broadenod profnslonal nadlng 
andlor academic course work; advances 
new concepts and ideas. 

' 

Dedlcatod to I f d o n g  krrning.  A8 r m u l  of 
active and conUnuour offor(r,  wldely ncognhed 
as m lntrllectual leader In profasrhnally d a t e d  
toplu.  M a k n  tlme for study and hkes 
advantage of all r-rcrs 
Introduces now and cmUve approaches to 
aewlcea isauaa.  Engages In a broad spectrum 
of forums and dialogues. 

and prognms. 

B 
m 
LY 

C 
n 
U 

D 
n 
U 

U 
2  DECISION MAKING ABILITY  Vlable and timely problem solution  Contrlbutin  elementa a n  judgment and dPctrivaness.  Lkcblona retlect the blancs 
bitween an opUmal solution anb a 18tlsfactory  workable solution Uiat generates?em 
mtabllshed Intent and the ooal of mlsslon accdm~llshment. Anticipation. mental mil% intuition. and success are Inherent 
4DV  Makes sound decisions 

Decisions are made within tho contoxt of the commandefs 

U 

U 

U U 

le8dlng to mlsslon 
accompllshnnnt  Actively 
cdkcta and evaluates 
lnkrmrtlon and weighs 

r.rulb.  ConfldonUy 
appfo8ches problems; 
8ccept.s nsponslbility for 
mncamee 

uh'eve  nmely 

Demonstrates mental agllity; effectively 
prioritizes and solves multiple complex 
problems.  Analytical abilities enhanced by 
experience, education, and intuition. 
Anticipates problems and lmplomonb vlaMe. 
long-term solutions.  Steadfast, willing to 
make difficult decisions. 

Wldely recognized and sought after to reaolve 
the most cribcal. complex problem.  Seldom 
matched analytical and IntuiUve abllltlea; 
accurately foreseer unexpected problem and 
arrives at well-timed dsdrloru despite log m d  
friction.  Completely confldont approach to all 
problems.  Masterfully s M k n  a balance 
ktween the desire for prfect knowledge and 
anater t e m ~ o .  

U 

U 
U 
3.  JUDGMENT.  The dlscrotionary 8apect of decision making.  Dram on c o n  Values, knowledge, and personal e x ~ s m e  
kmpmhends the consqwnces of contemplated courses of action. 
&DV  Maj~dty of Judgments are 

U 

U 

U 

to make wise choke& 

U  U 

I 

nmaaured, circumspect. 
nkvant and c m t .  

I 
I 
I 

correct, tempered by consideration of their 
consequences. Able to identny. Isolate and 

I Decisions are consistent and uniformly 
I assesirelevant factors in the d6clalon 

makina Drocass.  Ooiniona souaht hv 
(others:  hubordinatk penonal~n&st  in 
favor of im~artlal~tv. 

Decisions reflect exceptknrl IMQM  and wlrdom 
beyond this Marine's exparience.  Counsel wught 
by all; often an arblter.  Conahtent, superior 
judgment Inspires the confidence of senion. 

-  - - 

JUSTIFICATION: 

I 
I 
6 

- 

UUATIONS.  The extent to whlch thls omcer servlng as a remrtlng OmcIal conducted, or requlrod othen toconduct, w u n t r ,  unlnfhtod,ind tlnmty 

. 

- 

- 

that conl8lned 

O c c u l w l t y  submitted 
untlmoly w admlnbtnUvely 
Incomct waluatfons.  An 
Rs,  r u b m m  
or more 
m p o ~ t ~  
Inflated markings.  An RO, 
concurred wkh one or 
mom mporta from 
subordinrt.. 
that w o n  
n t u r n u l  by HQMC for 
Inflated marking. 

inflated marking.  No 

Prepared uninflated evaluations which w e n  
consistently submitted on Ume.  Evaluations 
accurately described performance and 
character.  Evaluations contdned no Inflated 
markin  s.  No reports returnod by RO or 
H Q M C ? ~ ~  
subordinates' reports returned by HQMC for 
1nflat.d  marking.  Few. Hany, reports were 
returned by RO or HQMC for admlnlrtrative 
erron.  Soctlon Cs were void of 
superlatives.  Justificatio~ were rpecfflc 
verifiable, substentlve. and when p o 4 b i e ,  
quantifiable and supported the markings 
glven. 

8 
m 
U 

_J 
JUSTIFICATION: 

C 
n 
U 

D 
n 
U 

I No reports rubmltted Iatr.  No reporta mturnod by 

either RO or HQMC for or.dmlnlatntiw comctlon 
or Inflated mrklngs.  No subord1nat.r'  mporb 
returned by HQMC for a d m l n l W e  correctfon or 
infiatod markings.  Returned procedunlly or 
admlnlctratlvely incorrect reports to subordinates 
for correction.  As RO nonconcumd with all 
Inflated reports. 

NAVMC 108360 (Rev. 9-99) (WN 2 7 ) 

.nd  p r o d u c e s   s a t i s f a c t o r y   work  a n d   satisfactory  p e r f o r m a n c e   f r o m   his s e c t i o n .  
l e c i s i o n   making  a n d   i n i t i a t i v e   improved.  Needs  improvement  i n   h i s   l e a d e r s h i p   s k i l l s   and 
~ n d e r s t a n d i n g  you  l e a d   p e o p l e   a n d   manage  a   p r o c e s s .   H e   was  initially  c o m p l a c e n t   a n d  
: e q u l r e d   a  r e m i n d e r   t o   p r o d u c e   more  p r o f e s s i o n a , l   w o r k .  
mprove  a s   a  r e s u l t   o f   a   renewed  u n d e r s t a n d i n g   of  h i s   r e s p o n s i b i l i t i e s .  

H i s   performanc:e  h a s   begun  t o  

H i s  

!.  I ACKNOWLEDGE the adverse nature of this report and 

0 I have no statement to make 
0 1 have attached a statement 
a 

0 

- 

1.  OBSERVATION: 

Sufficient 

Insufficient 

(Signatr~rt of Msrlnt Repnrtcd On) 

I 2.  EVALUATION: 

3.  COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT: 
Provide a comparative assessment 
of potential by placing an "X"  in the 
appropriate box.  In marking the 
comparison, consider all Marines of 
this grade whose professional 
abilities are known to you personally. 

DESCRlPTlON 

- 

THE EMINENTLY QUALIFIED MARINE 

- 

ONE OF THE FEW 

EXCEPTIONALLY QUALIFIED MARINES 

ONE OF THE MANY HIGHLY QUALIFIED 

PROFESSIONALS WHO FORM THE 

- 

(Date in YYWMMDD format) 

Concur 

Do Not Concur 

-- 

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMEN1 

MAJORITY OF THIS GRADE 

A QUAUFIED MARINE -- 

UNSATISFACTORY 

- 

-- 

- 

I 

I.  REVIEWING OFFICER COMMENTS:  Amplify  your comparative assessment mark; evaluate potentla1 for continued professional 
evelopment to include: promotion. command,  assignment,  resident PME, and retention; and put Reporting Senlor ~ r k s  
and 
omntnts in perspective. 

4RC's  work  i m p r o v e d   d u r i n g   r e p o r t i n g   p e r i o d .   H i s   renewed  attentiveness  t o   t h e   m l s s l o n  
>ecame e v l d e n t   a n d   h i s   d e s i r e   t o   i m p r o v e   n o t i c e d .   The  q u a l l t y   of  w o r k   f r o m   rr:+'-iln  h l s  
l e c t l o n   b e g a n   t o   i m p r o v e   a s   a   r e s u l t   o f   his  p e r s o n a l   interest.  S e l e c t e d   a s   R e g m e n t a l  
i d l u t a n t   t o   c o n t i n u e   p r o f e s s i o n a l   d e v e l o p m e n t .  

5.  I CERTIFY that to the best of my knowledge 
wlief all entries made hereon are true and without 
~rejudice or partiality. 

j.  I ACKNOWLEDGE the adverse nature of this report and 

a I have no statement to make 

(Date In W W M M D D  format) 

I have attached a statement 

(Signature of Marins Reparted On) 

(Date in YWYMMDD format) 

ADOENWM PAGE ATTACHED: 

YES 

L 

NAVMC 10835E (Rev. 9-99) (WN  2.2) 

PAGE 6 OF 5 

mLE  PERFORMANCE "P" FICHE 

MEMORANDUM:, FOR  THE RECORD 

Sub j :  FITNESS  REPORT (S) ; CASE  OF 

1610 
MMSB-31 
t  8 APR  2004 

The  following  a d m i n i s t r a t i v e   c o r r e c t i o n   i s  made: 

P e r i o d   of  r e p o r t  

Occasion 

C o r r e c t i o n  

5a =  Adverse 

2 .   T h i s   c o r r e c t i o n   has n o t   been  made  on  the  f i t n e s s   r e p o r t   on  f i l e  t o  
p r e c l u d e   a  l o s s   i n   l e g i b i l i t y ,   however,  t h e   automated  record  has been 
c o r r e c t e d .  

This  c o r r e c t i o n   i s  v e r i f i e d  by  t h e   MRO1s r e c o r d ,   and  i n s t i t u t e d  by 

H e a d a a r t e r s .   Marine  Corns. 

d 

~ s s i s w n t  Head 
Performance  Evaluation  S e c t i o n   (MMSB-30) 
Personnel  Management  Support Branch 
Personnel  Management  Division 

USMC FITNESS REPORT 
N A W C  11 297 (Rev. 9-99) (WN  2.2) 

ADDENDUM PAGE 

DO NOT STAPLE 
THIS FORM 

1.  Purpose: 
a.  Continuation of Comments  b.  Accelerated Promotion 
Justification  Section I  RO 

Justification 

0  0 0  0  : '  

d. Admin 
MRO Statement  3rd Officer Sighter  Review 

c. Adverse Report 

0  Fl 

0  0  0 

e. Supplemental 

f.  HQMC 

Material 

Use 

: n c l :  

(1) Copy  o f   CMC  1 6 1 0 / 5 1   MMSB-31  l t r  of  4  Apr  2002 
( 2 )   Copy  of  MMSB-31  C e r t i f i e d   Mall  R e c e i p t   o f   5  A p r   2002 

:his f i t n e s s   r e p o r t   is  a d m i n i s t r a t i v e l y   t h i r d s i g h t e d   b y   t h i s   H e a d q u a r t e r s .   E n c l o s u r e  
e  was  n o t  

- e c e i v e d   f r  
~nsuccessf ul . 

b e e n  

P e r s o n n e l   ~ a n a g e r n e n t    ibis i o n  

1.  a.  Last Name 

b. First Name 

c. MI 

2. SSN 

3.  Service 

4.  Grade 

1.  a. Last Name 

I

b. First Name 

,

 

Signaturn 

(Date in YYYYMMDD format) 

2.  SSN 

c.  MI 

I 

I 

3.  Service 

I 

I 

4.  Grade 

I Signature 

(Date in YYYYMMDD format) 
i l o ~ h  

PAGE 

I 



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 05641-99

    Original file (05641-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    It is noted that the Commandant of the Marine Corps (CMC) has returned your contested fitness report for 2 July 1997 to 8 May 1998 to your reviewng officer for completion of his certification. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB. \'tw\;\cd Subj : MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVIS CAPTA THE CASE OF SMC 4.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04278-02

    Original file (04278-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In correspondence attached as enclosure (3), the HQMC office having cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's request to strike his failure of selection for promotion has commented to the effect that this request has merit and warrants favorable action. The petitioned fitness report contained competitive concerns that may have resulted in the failure of selection. Since the comments in the petitioned report likely contributed to Lieutenant colon@- selection, we recommend approval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00146-02

    Original file (00146-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    in the report of the PERB in concluding no correction of your fitness report record was warranted. Removal of the following fitness reports was requested: a. Lieutenant Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) denied his request for removal of the Annual fitness reports of 960801 to 970731 and 970801 to 980731. ailed selection on the FY-02 USMC on Board.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00839-02

    Original file (00839-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY BOARD F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 BJG Docket No: 839-02 25 February 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD - - Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. As indicated in enclosure (2), the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) has directed the requested correction of Petitioner's...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05561-03

    Original file (05561-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the fitness reports for 1 February to 19 May 1989, and 1 July 1989 to 16 January 1990, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tabs A and B, respectively. Having reviewed a l l the f a c t s of record, the Board has dl.rcsctcd that your naval record will be corrected by...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 02618-98

    Original file (02618-98.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in the report of the PERB in finding that your contested adverse fitness report should not be removed. Regardless, the report under Sub j : MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY LIEUTENAN SE OF FIRST USMC consideration is the official report of record and the one to which the petitioner responded. (7) ~ajor- advocacy letter of 23 November 1998 claims he was not aware that the petitioner 'was involved...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05733-03

    Original file (05733-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    We defer to BCNR on the issue of Lieutenant Colonel request for the removal of her failure of selection to the grade of Lieutenant Colonel. we furnished her with a copy of the Advisory Opinion Head, performance Evaluation Review Branch Personnel Management Division By direction of the Commandant of the Marine Corps DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY I i E A O Q U A R T E R S U N I T E D S T A T E S M A R I N E C O R P S 3280 R U S S E L L R O A D Q U A N T I C O . Per the reference, we reviewed...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2005-00153

    Original file (FD2005-00153.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD ANDREWS AFB, MD r c 1 ) (HGH SRA) .i 1. SERVICE UNDER REVIEW: ;>. DC 20693 DD FORM 293.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02761-03

    Original file (02761-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 28 March 2003, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03760-99

    Original file (03760-99.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 7 June 1999, and the memorandum furnished by HQMC dated 25 August 1999, copies of which are attached. c. First Sergean explanations into is no excuse for Officer and Adverse Sighting Officer. Contrary to the information included in subparagraph 3b of reference (b), further research indicates that the Adverse Sighting Officer (Lieutenant Colone fitness...