Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04764-02
Original file (04764-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

JLP:ddj
Docket No: 4764-02
4 September 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 18 11 Pers 822 of 26 July 2002, a copy of which is
attached.

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
injustice.
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL

5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE

MILLINGTON TN  

38055-0000

MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, PERS-OOZCB

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

(a) NPC memo 5420 PERS-OOZCB of 28 Jun 02
(b) Title 10 U.S. Code 971

Statement  of Service of 26 Jul 02

(1) 
(2) BCNR file

~ 1.

Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in

subject officer's case.
correction to his Certificate of Release or Discharge from
Active Duty (DD 214) to include time spent in the Naval Academy.

Petitioner requests a

Specifically,

Enclosure (1) is provided to document member's time in the
(b) this time is not creditable

2.
Naval Academy.
for any purpose and therefore is not included and cannot be
added as active duty on the member's DD 214.

Per reference  

3.

Enclosure (2) is returned.

Officer Retirements

Date of Report:

07/26/02

09

Statement of Service

Inactive

Active

Training

07/28/44

08/06/44

08/07/44

09/28/45

09/29/45  

06/16/48

Subtotals

Active Inactive

0

0

9

1

2

1 22

8  18

Midshipman, U. S. Naval Academy from  

not creditable

06/17/48  to 

06/05/52

06/06/52

04/30/78

PEBD:

PSD:

07/17/48

25 10 25

ADSD:

07/26/48

ELIGIBLE TO RETIRE:

1968

MOS.

46

A-E

USNR-E
USNR-E

USN-E

USN-O

DATE OF BIRTH:
09/04/26

ACBD:

DGAD:

06/06/52

06/06/52

AVIATION COMMISSION DATE

This statement supersedes all prior statements of service

Examiner: R 

/ Reviewer:



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08029-00

    Original file (08029-00.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations In addition, the Board considered the advisory and policies. 2. certain criteria are entitled to constructive credit. 6 months and 9 days of active duty and was not entitled to Enclosure (1) shows member only completed 19 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07416-05

    Original file (07416-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 May 2006. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Bureau of Medicine and Surgery dated 7 October 2005 and the Navy Personnel Command dated 14 November 2005 with enclosure, copies of which are attached. Reference (a) request comments and recommendations in subject member’s case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06730-01

    Original file (06730-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1) shows member served four years of active enlisted service from 1 June 1993 to 31 May 1997, Reserves until he joined the Air Force Reserves on 17 August 1998. a nator: Date of Report: 10/24/01 33 Statement of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01483-01

    Original file (01483-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    period from 20 December 1958 to 28 January 1965 you were a member of the Marine Corps Reserve and earned about four years and six months of qualifying service for reserve retirement. Therefore, the Board substantially T.he Board also considered whether your record could or should be corrected to show that you are eligible for reserve retirement and retired pay at age 60. retirement, an individual must have 20 years of qualifying service and the last eight years must be in the reserve...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04354-02

    Original file (04354-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 5420 Pers attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. (c) authorized the summer training of an officer as a non-academy midshipman as creditable service under section 1405 of reference (d).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06028-01

    Original file (06028-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by 3. the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08280-01

    Original file (08280-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Pers 811 of 30 January 2002, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner had orders to CTR "A" school with a class 3. convening date of 22 May 01 and a projected graduation date of 26 September 2001. graduated early and reenlisted...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06172-02

    Original file (06172-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD Y S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 MEH: ddj Docket No: 6172-02 13 November 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. petitioner's request.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01068-04

    Original file (01068-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 May 2004. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Per reference (a), the following comments and recommendations are submitted concerning Fireman case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05180-02

    Original file (05180-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he reenlisted USNR(TAR), vice USN. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The Branch/Class...