S
HD: hd
Docket No:
8 August 2002
04678-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY
BOARD
FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC
20370-5100
From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
To:
Secretary of the Navy
Subj:
LC
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
USN
Ref: (a)
Title 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl :
(1)
(2)
(3)
DD Form 149 dtd 30 Apr 02
PERS-80 memo dtd 10 Jul 02
Subject’s naval record
w/ref (a)
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner,
1.
filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected to show his lieutenant commander date of rank and effective date as 1 October
2001, the date he would have been assigned but for delay of his Senate confirmation.
He
currently has a 16 October 2001 date of rank and effective date.
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Kastner, Schultz and Zsalman, reviewed Petitioner
allegations of error and injustice on 8 August
2002, and pursuant to its regulations,
determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available
evidence of record. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of the
enclosures, naval records, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
’s
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining to Petitioner
of error and injustice, finds as follows:
’s allegations
a. Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all administrative remedies
available under existing law and regulations within the Department of the Navy.
In correspondence attached as enclosure
(2), the Navy Personnel Command (NIX)
b.
office with cognizance over the subject matter of this case has commented to the effect that
Petitioner’s request has merit and warrants favorable action. They recommend changing his
lieutenant commander date of rank (and by implication, effective date) to 1 October 2001.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record,
(2), the Board finds the existence of an
contents of enclosure
following corrective action.
and especially in light of the
injustice warranting the
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show his date of
rank and effective date in the grade of lieutenant commander as 1 October 2001, vice
16 October 2001; and that his lineal precedence be adjusted accordingly.
b. That any material or entries inconsistent with the Board ’s recommendation be
corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner ’s record and that no such entries
or material be added to the record in the future.
C. That a copy of this Report of Proceedings be filed at an appropriate location in
Petitioner’s naval record, and that another copy of this report be returned to this Board,
together with any material directed to be removed from Petitioner
confidential file maintained for such purpose.
’s record, for retention in a
4.
Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was
present at the Board ’s review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete
record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled matter.
ROBERT D.
Recorder
ZSALMAN
A?&_$+&/
JONATHAN
:.
Acting Recorder
&/_
RUSKIN
_&+?&%
to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of
5. Pursuant
the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section
723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved by
the Board on behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.
UEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
5420
10 JUL 2002
MEPIORANDUM FOR BCNR
Subj:
ACTIVE DUTY PROMOTIONS TO THE PERMANENT GRADE OF
LIEUTENANT COMMANDER LINE
Ref:
(a) CNO WASHINGTON DC 1820272 OCT 01
1. Recommend approval of all BCNR requests, submitted by the
officers listed in reference (a),
to 1 October 2001.
to adjust their dates of rank
In accordance with the Active Duty FY-02 Officer Promotion
2.
Plan, the officers listed in reference (a) were scheduled for
promotion on 1 October 2001. However,
confirm the FY-02 Active Duty Lieutenant Commander Line
promotion list until 16 October 2001.
of the promotion list resulted in the listed officers being
assigned a date of rank of 16 October 2001.
the Senate did not
The delayed confirmation
Recommend the dates of rank for all officers listed in
3.
reference (a) be changed to 1 October 2001.
r Officer Progression
ADMINISTRATIVE MESSAGE
ROUTINE
R 1820272 OCT 01 ZYB MIN PSN
448983J36
FM CNO WASHINGTON
DC//Nl//
TO NAVADMIN
UNCLAS
NAVADMIN
llN00000il
277/01
MSGID/GENADMIN/Nl//
SUBJ/ACTIVE DUTY PROMOTIONS TO THE PERMANENT OR TEMPORARY GRADE
/OF LIEUTENANT COMMANDER LINE AND STAFF CORPS//
REF/A/DOC/CONGRESS/OlOCTl996//
REF/B/DOC/CONGRESS/OlOCTl996//
REF/C/DOC/SECNAV/24JULl985//
REF/D/DOC/SECNAV/08JANl991//
REF/E/DOC/SECNAV/15NOVl989//
REF/F/DOC/SECNAV/13DECl999//
REF/G/DOC/NAVPERS/OlOCTl999//
NARR/REF A IS 10 U.S.C. 624.
SECNAVINST
SECNAVINST
FORM
1210.5A.
1811.3M.
1421/7 REV.
lo-99.//
REF B IS 10 U.S.C. 5596.
REF C IS
REF D IS SECNAVINST
REF F IS SECNAVINST
1420.1A.
1920.6B.
REF E IS
REF G IS NAVPERS
THIS NAVADMIN IS THE AUTHORITY FOR EFFECTING TEMPORARY AND
RMKS/l.
PERMANENT OFFICER PROMOTIONS.
NAVY, ACTING FOR THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, APPOINTS
PERMANENT REGULAR AND RESERVE OFFICERS TO THE GRADE OF LIEUTENANT
PER REF B,
COMMANDER IN THE LINE AND STAFF CORPS.
THE NAVY TEMPORARILY APPOINTS LIMITED DUTY OFFICERS.
APPOINTMENTS ARE EFFECTIVE ON THE DATE INDICATED.
UNDER REF A, THE SECRETARY OF THE
THE SECRETARY OF
THESE
RESERVE OFFICERS SHOULD CONSULT REF C FOR INFORMATION CONCERNING
DIRECT INQUIRIES TO NAVPERSCOM
2.
TRANSFER TO THE REGULAR NAVY.
(PERS-801).
IF A COMMANDING OFFICER DETERMINES THAT AN OFFICER UNDER HIS OR
3.
HER COMMAND IS NOT MENTALLY, PHYSICALLY, MORALLY, OR PROFESSIONALLY
QUALIFIED FOR PROMOTION,
THIS IS THE CASE,
BEFORE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF APPOINTMENT, UNLESS IT IS IMPRACTICAL TO
DO SO, IN WHICH CASE
REQUIRES THAT SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION AND A STATEMENT FROM THE
OFFICER BE FORWARDED IMMEDIATELY TO NAVPERSCOM
NAVPERSCOM (PERS-8023).
THE COMMANDING OFFICER SHOULD NOTIFY THE OFFICER
NOTIFI$ATION WILL BE AS SOON AS POSSIBLE.
THE PROMOTION SHALL NOT BE EFFECTED. IF
(PERS-83), COPY TO
REF D
4.
OFFICERS CONSIDERING VOLUNTARY RETIREMENT SHOULD REVIEW REF E FOR
815102
SERVICE OBLIGATION UPON ACCEPTING PROMOTION.
RESIGNATION OR RELEASE FROM ACTIVE DUTY UNDER REF F MAY ACCEPT
PROMOTION WITHOUT INCURRING ANY ADDITIONAL ACTIVE DUTY OBLIGATION.
OFFICERS ANTICIPATING
PROVIDED THE OFFICER IS QUALIFIED UNDER
5.
OFFICER SHALL PREPARE AND HAVE THE OFFICER VERIFY AND SIGN REF I
ACCEPTING OR DECLINING THE PROMOTION.
APPOINTED UNDER REFS A OR B ARE CONSIDERED TO HAVE ACCEPTED SUCH
APPOINTMENT ON THE DATE INDICATED UNLESS EXPRESSLY DECLINED IN
WRITING.
NAVPERSCOM (PERS-8023).
MAIL ONLY THE ORIGINAL OF REF G WITHIN 30 DAYS TO
PARA 3, THE COMMANDING
OFFICERS LISTED BELOW WHO ARE
PROPOSED LEGISLATION IN THE FISCAL YEAR 2002 NATIONAL DEFENSE
6.
AUTHORIZATION ACT (NDAA) WOULD AUTHORIZE THE SECRETARY OF THE NAVY
TO ADJUST THE DATE OF RANK OF THOSE OFFICERS BELOW WHO SHOULD HAVE
BEEN PROMOTED ON 1 OCT 01.
PROPOSED LEGISLATION THE DOR OF THE OFFICERS BELOW WILL
AUTOMATICALLY BE ADJUSTED TO 1 OCT 01
UPON ENACTMENT OF THE NDAA WITH THE
READ NAME,
LAST FOUR DIGIT SSN/DESIG
PERMANENT PROMOTION TO LIEUTENANT COMMANDER
APPOINTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF REF A
LINE
SENATE CONFIRMED
DOR/EFF DATE
ICTED LINE OFF1
5892/1100
7145/1315
16 OCT 2001
16 OCTOBER 2001
R
J
sa
4956/1100
9613/1100
1439/11
3586/113Oc_
9091/1100 ,
7494/1100 4
7878/1100
a
ii&
0819/13181
ENGINEERING DUTY OFFICER 14XX
AEROSPACE
‘426
.I^
.._
-MAINTENANCE
4691/1520
FICER 152X
SPECI-AL DUTY OFFICER CRYPTOLOGY 161x
9309/1615
AL DUTY OFFICER INT
-.-
__
_~_
.-.
,5774/1310
4634/1100
9195/1320
6813/1310
1653/1100
2460/1115
:>,
b
%
7939/1310
2516/1100
3571/1100
9116/1100
aO6/1100
1378/1100
4285/1310
6/1110
3/1100
5958/1100
_9843/1310
_._
'40/1315
2064/1100
7840/1100
1794/1310
0241/1310
0700/1110
-6
1514/1610
http:Nwww.bupers.navy.mivnavadmin/navOllnavOl277.txt
s/5/02
8443/1630
5469/1630
SPECIAL DUTY OFFICER
2657/1650
DUTY OFFICER
JR
3546/1800
TY OFFICER LI
3074/6180
2790/6430
1565/6400
28/6470
60/6330
74/6260
OMOTION
PEALE
'UBLIC AFFAIRS 165X
OCEANOGRAPHY
180X
IE
61XX.62XX.63xx.64~~
1382/6430
2817/6460
9874/6410
6046/6110
!2562/6440
'0 LIEUTENANT COMMANDER
T
LINE
APPOINTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF REF B
DOR/EFF DATE
DUTY OFFICER LINE
16 OCTOBER 2001
61XX,62XX,63xx,64xx
7393/6131
PERMANENT PROMOTION TO LIEUTENANT COMMANDER
STAFF CORPS
APPOINTED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF REF A
SENATE CONFIRMED
DOR/EFF DATE
27 JULY 2001
01 OCTOBER 2001
CER STAFF
65Xx
CONGRATULATIONS.
RELEASED,
7.
8.
BT
http:Nwww.bupers.navy.mivnavadmin/navOl/nav01277.txt
815102
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05903-02
They recommended against a special board for the FY 03 g- The memorandum for the record at enclosure (5) documents that a representative of the Bureau of Naval Personnel Petitioner’s record to show commissioning as an SC officer on 1 February 2002 would not cause cognizant Navy authorities to place the officer, without the officer special selection board for the FY 03 SC Commander Selection Board. Recommend approval of their requests for back-dating of effective date of commissioning as...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06689-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 HD:hd Docket No: 06689-02 4 November 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : LCD REV Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. He was not considered, as he was not commissioned as an SC officer until after this promotion board had convened. (4), NPC Code Pers-8023, having reviewed the ’s failure of g. The memorandum for the record at enclosure (5)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06116-02
This was his second failure of selection for promotion to commander. The FY 03 Supply Corps (SC) Commander Selection Board convened on 11 March 2002. the Fleet the Subj: REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATION IN CASE OF FLEET SUPPORT OFFICERS’ REDESIGNATION TO SUPPLY CORPS (‘ommunity ManageI- From: Sent: To: Subject: SNET.Navy.Mil] ORIGINAL OPINION is email as authority to withdraw PERS-80 original opinion not recommending relief for the following officers: After reviewing the HRO...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00404-00
Since the Board finds that Petitioner ’s promotion should have been effected before the President acted to remove him from the promotion list, they conclude that the President’s removal action was a nullity. Petitioner would have been promoted on 26 September 1997 if his appointment had not been delayed. not have an effective date of appointment.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02324-00
The regulations approved by the Secretary of the Navy require that the naval record of Subject officer be corrected, where appropriate, in accordance with the of the Board. 14837-88 PERS-85 memo dtd 27 Jul 00 Subject ’s naval record 00 w/encls Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show SPOT promotion to lieutenant commander...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01135-06
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100BJG Docket No: 1135-06 19 December 2006This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.You requested, in effect, that your naval record be corrected to show that you were not removed from the Fiscal Year 2003 or 2004 Lieutenant All Fully Qualified Officers Promotion List and that you were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08281-02
The FY 03 Supply Corps (SC) Commander Selection was not commissioned as an SC officer until after this promotion board had convened. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the authority of reference (a), has been approved...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05953-02
However, they do not feel this would be remedial, as Petitioner did not request it; and NPC has advised that if she were considered by such a special selection board, a failure of selection might well result, which would effectively negate the benefit of removing her failure by the FY 03 Line Commander Selection Board. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06108-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV Y BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 HD: hd Docket No: 06 108-02 4 November 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: LC Ref: Encl: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD S (a) Title 10 U.S.C. They recommended against a special board for the FY 03 f. The memorandum for the record at enclosure (4) documents that a representative of the Bureau of Naval Personnel Petitioner’s record to show...
The DOR was established as 1 Sep 00, per the Department of The Navy, Special Promotion Selection Board letter, dated 11 May 01 According to DPA, on 26 May 00, the applicant was appointed into the Air Force Reserve as a major IAW Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2005, Appointment in Commissioned Grades and Designation and Assignment in Professional Categories - Reserve of the Air Force and United States Air Force, Table 2.3, “Appointment Grade and Computation of TYSD, Date of Rank (DOR), &...