DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
CRS
Docket No: 4705-02
23 October 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code,
Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 17 October 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures. applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 13
September 1985 after more than four years of prior active
service.
You then served without incident until 25 February
1987, when you submitted a written request for an other than
honorable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for
assault and two instances of drunk and disorderly conduct.
to submitting this request you conferred with a qualified
military lawyer at which time you were advised of your rights and
warned of the probable adverse consequences of accepting such a
discharge.
action, you were spared the stigma of a court-martial conviction
and the potential penalties of a punitive discharge and
confinement at hard labor.
discharge on 8 April 1987.
Your request was granted and, as a result of this
Prior
You received the other than honorable
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity.
However, the Board found these factors were not
The Board believed that
sufficient to warrant recharacterizationn of your discharge given
the seriousness of the offenses.
considerable clemency was extended to you when your request for
discharge to avoid trial by court-martial was approved since, by
this action, you escaped the possibility of confinement at hard
Further, the Board concluded
labor and a punitive discharge.
that you received the benefit of your bargain when your request
for discharge was granted and should not be permitted to change
The Board concluded that your discharge was proper as
it now.
issued and no change is warranted.
has been denied.
will be furnished upon request.
Accordingly, your application
The names and votes of the members of the panel
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05336-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together'with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your request for discharge to avoid trial for a two year period of unauthorized absence, actions. the Board concluded that no change to the discharge is warranted.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 10053-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06456-05
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your lengthy unauthorized absence and especially your request for discharge to avoid trial for this offense. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01615-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Navy on 21 December 1984 after two years of prior honorable service. Because...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 08603-06
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 July 2007. On 1 May 1987 your request for discharge was granted, and on 11 May 1987 you received an other than honorable discharge in lieu of trial by court-martial. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05897-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your request for discharge to avoid trial for an unauthorized absence of about ten months. Your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03736-02
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. factors were not discharge given your request for discharge to avoid trial for sufgicient to warrant recharacterization of your such as your youth and immaturity However, the Board concluded that these unauthorized absences totalling more than seven months. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03087-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct and especially your request...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04275-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board noted that you were issued a clemency 1970's and not an honorable discharge as you The Board believed that considerable clemency was extended to you when your request for discharge to avoid trial by court-martial was approved since, by this action, Further, of confinement at hard...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03000-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your request was granted on 25 March 1976 and, as a result of this action, you were spared the stigma of a court-martial conviction and the potential penalties of...