Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04691-02
Original file (04691-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD  

FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

TRG
Docket No:
15 November 2002

4691-02

Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Secretary of the Navy

RECORD OF

(a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552

(1) Case Summary
(2) Subject's naval record

From:
To:

Subj:

Ref:

Encl:

Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a
filed an application with
that her separation program

1.
former enlisted member in the Navy,
this Board requesting, in effect,
designator (SPD) code be changed in order to establish
eligibility for the Montgomery G.I. Bill (MGIB).

The Board, consisting of Mr. Milner, Mr. Dunne and Ms. Hare,

2.
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13
November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that
the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the
available evidence of record.
the Board consisted of the enclosures, naval records, and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.

Documentary material considered by

The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining

3.
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as
follows:

a.

Before applying to this Board, Petitioner exhausted all

administrative remedies available under existing law and
regulations within the Department of the Navy.

b.

Although it appears that Petitioner's application was

not filed in a timely manner,
waive the statute of limitations and review the application on
its merits.

it is in the interest of justice to

C .

Petitioner enlisted in the Navy on 3 July 1995 at age 18

and elected to participate in the MGIB.
discharge documentation is not filed in the record.
record shows that she was married to an active duty service
member and her son was born on 6 September 1997.
shows that she was honorably discharged on 5 December 1997 by
reason of "Parenthood/custody of minor children" with an SPD code
of "KDG"
.
voluntary.
years, five months and three day of active service.

The KDG code indicates that her separation was
At the time of her discharge, she had completed two

The administrative

The DD Form 214

However, the

d.

The Board is aware that Petitioner is not eligible for

MGIB because she did not complete 30 months of active duty, and
there is no provision in the law that would allow the refund of
However, she would be eligible for
her $1,200 MGIB payment.
payments under MGIB based on her 29 months of active service if
As previously noted, the SPD of
her separation was involuntary.
Therefore, she
KDG indicates that her separation was voluntary.
An SPD of JDG would indicate
is being denied all MGIB benefits.
that her separation was involuntary, and she would be entitled to
29 months of MGIB benefits.

e.

Petitioner contends that she did nothing wrong and is

improperly being denied benefits to which she is entitled.
Board recognizes that as the mother of a young child she would
have had difficulties in standing watches, performing shift work
and deployments, and in this situation, she could not have signed
a dependent care certificate and would have been involuntarily
discharged.

The

CONCLUSION:

The Board notes that if she had stayed on active duty

Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record the
Board concludes that Petitioner's request warrants favorable
action.
another 27 days, she would have been entitled to MGIB benefits.
Although she apparently requested discharge it appears that as a
mother of a young child she really did not have many options.
she had not requested discharge,
not have signed a dependent care certificate and would have been
processed for an involuntary discharge.
including her good record of service and the fact that she was
within 27 days of qualifying for MGIB, the Board concludes that
Petitioner's SPD should be changed to JDG so that she can receive
29 months of benefits.

If
it is very likely that she could

Given the circumstances,

The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings
should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future
reviewers will understand her MGIB entitlement.

RECOMMENDATION:

That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that on 5

a.
December 1997 she was assigned a Separation Program Designator
(SPD) of JDG vice the SPD of 

KDG now of record.

That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's

b.
naval record.

4.

It is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's

2

and that the foregoing is a true and
review and deliberations,
complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled
matter.

._

._--,-
/’
-_i

:// 
,,::i,

,’
,_- ’_.

ROBERT D. ZSALMAN
Recorder

(. 
ALAN E. GOLDSMITH
Acting Recorder

.,:_-.-- ’

Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section

5.
6(e) of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of
Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e))
and having assured compliance with its provisions, it is hereby
announced that the foregoing corrective action, taken under the
has been approved by the Board on
authority of reference (a),
behalf of the Secretary of the Navy.

\

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10871-02

    Original file (10871-02.PDF) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (b) BUPERSINST 1900.8 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, to change her job title, reenlistment code, and reason for separation to establish eligibility for Montgomery G. I. However, Petitioner's record does not contain the latest primary Navy Reference (b) states Yt listed on uty (DD Form h. Petitioner is not...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00746-01

    Original file (00746-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y A N N E X W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 TRG Docket No: 746-01 2 March 2001 From: To : Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy " OF NAVAL RECORD 0 Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his separation...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00155-01

    Original file (00155-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TUR Docket No: 155-01 22 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL OF RECORD ggasiisieninscaiiiiiiaiaiiiiiiliaas Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. Based on the foregoing, the Board concludes that the appropriate relief is a change in Petitioner's SPD code from KDG to JDF so that she may obtain pro-rata MGIB benefits based on her 20 months...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02992-02

    Original file (02992-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a filed an application with 1. former enlisted member in the Navy, this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show and involuntary separation program designator (SPD) code vice the voluntary SPD code now of record. SPD code of KDG now of record Therefore, the SPD code should be changed to The Board also notes that Petitioner However, given the JDG vice the The Board further...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01045-02

    Original file (01045-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an 1. enlisted member of the Naval Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that the reason for her discharge from the Navy be changed to hardship so that she will be eligible to receive Montgomery G.I. discharge, it appears that had she been properly advised and remained on active duty until the birth of her child, on 5 June 1994, she would be...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00940-01

    Original file (00940-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the United States Navy filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show entitlement to the Montgomery G. I. (Petitioner) requested to be separated from the U. An SPD of JDF would indicate that her separation was involuntary and she would be entitled to at least 28 months of MGIB benefits.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00398-02

    Original file (00398-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To : Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy filed an application with this Board requesting that her record be corrected to show that she was separated by reason of hardship vice pregnancy or childbirth. e. The Board is aware that Petitioner is not eligible for the MGIB because she did not complete 30 months of active duty, and there is no provision in the law...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 02990-04

    Original file (02990-04.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After your discharge, you were rated as 10% disabled by the Department of Veterans Affairs.In your application you are requesting that the SPD code be changed to “JDG”, which will indicate that you were discharged by reason of parenthood or custody of minor children and your discharge was involuntary. Further, there is no evidence that a discharge by reason of physical disability was warranted. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10977-02

    Original file (10977-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Board, consisting of Mr.--Mr.d.lIlband -reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 July 2003 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. The record should then show that, on 5 December 1996, she began terminal leave and remained in that status until she was honorably discharged by reason of pregnancy/childbirth on 26 December 1996 with two years, six months of active...

  • CG | BCMR | Discharge and Reenlistment Codes | 1998-055

    Original file (1998-055.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    This final decision, dated June 15, 2000, is signed by the three duly APPLICANT’S ORIGINAL ALLEGATIONS AND REQUESTED RELIEF The applicant, a former xxxxxxxxxx, asked the Board to correct her record by changing the separation code (SPD code) and narrative reason for discharge in blocks 26 and 28, respectively, on the DD 214 discharge form issued upon her release from active duty. On August 15, 1991, the applicant signed another statement of under- standing regarding MGIB (form DD 2366) with...