NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04782-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval ~ecords, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In accordance with Marine Corps policy, all drug abusers are processed for separation, and those separated normally are discharged under other than...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04790-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04794-02
filed enclosure ( 1 ) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to sliow EAOS of 28 June 2004, with 48 KADO nionths. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Cooper, Hogue, and Milner, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and i~i.justice on 29 May 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, deterniined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. His EAOS is 28 June 2004, vice 28 June 2002, (based on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04797-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement to a Dental Officer Multiyear Retension Bonus (DOMRB). The Board, consisting of Messrs. ’ McBride, Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 08 October 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04798-02
"in zone" population, two opportunity for promotion may g. USMC, RAP-36, the office responsible for establishing the promotion criteria for the active reserve master sergeants recommended that the each Marine erroneously considered in the "below enclosure (2). MC0 j. Petitioner then submitted a request to the Board for Correction of Naval Records requesting consideration for promotion to E-8 before an Enlisted Remedial Selection Board alleging that he was only given a 41.6% opportunity when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04808-02
I-eviewetl Petitioner's allegations of error antl injt~stice o n 5 June 2002 antl, ptlr-swit to its regulations, cleterminecl that tlie corrective action indicated helow slio~~ltl IIe taken on the av;tilahle evitlence of record. That Petitioner's naval record he corl-ccted. that: Docket No: 4808-02 I'ursirimt to Section 6(c) 01' the revised 1'1-ocetlure~ of' the 13oartl for Carl-ection of Naval 4.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04809-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 February 2001. Such awards are made without regard to the issue of fitness for military duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04809-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. and especially in light of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04812-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record changes in his characterization of service The Board, consisting'of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, and reenlistment code. After reviewing the relevant evidence of record and new information concerning Petitioner's pre-service civil involvement, the Board believes that Petitioner was processed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04816-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 September 2002. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 11 ‘July 2Qo2, a copy of which is attached. Marine Corps policy is that reasonable efforts at rehabilitation should be made and that the commander is authorized to document those efforts by a page 11 counseling entry per the IRAM.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04822-99
The adverse letter qualifies as "other reports, or correspondence of a military nature" per paragraph b . d. The adverse letter was the result of a report to CMC Sergean Sergean (MMPR-2) by known by this Divis rebutted by 4. provide advisory opinion and recommendations. the adverse fitness report precipitated the adverse letter.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04826-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04827-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, the Board also noted that you were terminated from the program of alternate service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04832-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 August 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CMC...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04835-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. The The On 18 September 1984 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of the serious nature of your repetitive drug use,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04838-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish entitlement to a zone “A” Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for the ETSW rating. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Brezna, Milner, and Neuschafer, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 4 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04840-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The punishment imposed was 5 days of On 19 December 1973 you again On 20 March 1974 you received NJP for a 19 day period of unauthorized absence from 28 February to 18 March 1974 and missing ship's movement. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04841-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 February 2002. following performance evaluation report, from the new command to which you reported, begins on 30 January 1997, they noted that Personnel Instruction 1610.10, enclosure report on the day following the ending date of the previous report your application has been denied. The member alleges reference (a) is in error and block- 15 should indicate 29...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04843-00
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he is entitled to an incentive allowance for moving his household goods (HHGs) under the “Do-It-Yourself” (DITY) Program. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Milner, Neuschafer, and Ms. Hare, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 13 February 2001 and, pursuant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04844-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this materi'al considered by the Board consisted Board. You Prior to submitting this request you On 9 September 1969 you submitted a request for an undesirable discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court- martial...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04848-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04849-01
On 19 December 1997, 3. received NJP for unauthorized absence a&d disobedience of a lawful order- in violation of Articles 86 and 92 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice Petitioner, then a corporal, grade E-4, of $598.00 pay per month for 2 months. appeal was denied on 8 January 1998. was awarded reduction in grade to E-3 and The forfeiture was Petitioner's (UCMJ), respectively. Petitioner's appeal was denied on 8 (PT) by lawful written order and the Petitioner was assigned to 4.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04854-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The Board also believed that considerable clemency was extended to you when your request for discharge to avoid trial by court-martial was approved since, by this action, confinement at hard labor and a punitive discharge. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04859-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. e) MEPERS evaluation dated 26 April 2001 rendered the not have a Personality opinion that the service member does Disorder. Recommendation: There is insufficient documentation to 4. evaluate the diagnosis of Personality Disorder, Not Otherwise Specified.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04861-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were sentenced to 30 days of confinement at hard labor and a forfeiture of $426. other than honorable discharge was appropriate, based on your NJP and court martial conviction.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04862-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You received the bad conduct discharge on 8 May The court sentenced you to confinement at hard Portions of the confinement In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04876-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitled to Basic Allowance for Subsistence (BAS) effective the date he reported to his new unit of assignment. CONCLUSION Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, contents of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence of an following corrective action. ROBERT D....
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04877-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 November 2002. You received the bad conduct discharge on 21 January 1958. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04880-01
materia.1 considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The Board thus concluded that there is no error or injustice in your reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04880-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:ddj Docket No: 4880-02 20 August 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy ----- - --” --.- Ref: Encl: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to cancel a reenlistment. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04882-02
member appears requesting ratings for three diagnoses: migraines, medical board, the member's medical record indicates that she has been worked up and extensively evaluated for pain complaints referable to every organ system in the body. The medical board notes an MRI of the lumbosacral area, L5-Sl with no significant effect on the The physical examination in the medical board notes that With regard to the member's request for a rating on lumbosacral strain, the member wished to have this...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04884-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that his Home of Record and correct mailing address is shown on all the documents which recalled him to active duty. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04885-01
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 15 June 2001, a copy of which is attached. The petitioner states he had no adverse counseling and naturally assumed his performance was acceptable.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04887-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2002. the code would not alter the fact that you were discharged by reason of physical disability, and that you would still need a waiver in order to reenlist. In this regard, it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04891-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. (2), the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04899-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 21 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04900-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 April 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. included an unauthorized absence of 24 days and drunk and disorderly conduct. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04900-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show advanced when first eligible. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Carlsen, Frankfurt, and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner allegations of error and injustice on 13 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04910-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC: Ic rhkt No: 49 IO July 2001 10-02 Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Pursuant to the provisions 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board corrected to show entitled to Basic dependents. 01‘ refcrettce (a). rcqucsting, in Allo\~~nce Sul!jecr rt‘fect, hei~cinal‘ter referred to as Petitioner, that the applicable naval record be Hol~sing (RAH) for designated location...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04912-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. It was recommended that you be processed On 8 May 1978 you received a On 2 June 1978 you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of unsuitability due to your diagnosed personality disorder. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04922-00
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNE WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 X 0 From: To: Subj : Ref: Encl: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RE (a) 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that her naval record be corrected to show that she was retired by reason of physical disability. She...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04933-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 hlEH:yrj l)ocket No: Cl .luIy 2003 4933-02 lkxirtl. a. available Before applyin, untlcr esisting 0 to this la\\, CONCLIISION and consideration ot‘ all Upon review contents of following corrective action enclowrl: (2), the Hr);irtl . the i‘inrls cvitlonce tlic 01‘ cxistcncc i-ccord, kin ot‘ and especially in light of th e ill,iusticc warranting th e Docket No: 4933-02 RECOMMENDATION: That...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04934-02
In addition, the Board considered the report of the Headquarters Marine Corps (HQMC) Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB), dated 21 May 2002, and the advisory opinion from the HQMC Officer Counseling and Evaluation Section, Personnel Management Division, dated 13 June 2002, copies of which are attached. Subj: MARINE CORPS PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REVIEW BOARD (PERB) ADVISORY OPINION IN THE CASE OF MAJOR ON BCNR APPLICATION USMC The Board's opinion, 4. vote, is that the contested fitness...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04935-00
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. s provided several letters o Offic insight and reflect favorably on Petty C as e. Counseling of a member takes many forms.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04936-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he terminated his enrollment in the Survivor Benefit Plan. The Board, consisting of Mr. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 20 August 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04946-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 TJR Docket No: 4946-01 7 January 2002 Dea This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. the--Board for Correction of Naval A three-member panel of Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 January 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04951-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted your naval record and applicable statutes, pr0cedure.s applicable to the proceedings of this Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04952-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. 1980 you were convicted by a special court martial for unauthorized absence from 16 June to 13 November 1979, a period of 150 days; failure to go to your appointed place of duty and missing ship's movement. were...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04958-02
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting, in effect, that his discharge be upgraded. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Pfeiffer, Exnicios, and Shy, 2. allegations of error and injustice on 20 reviewed Petitioner's November 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04968-01
contentions that you were punished twice for the same offense, thus becoming a victim of double-jeopardy, and that your martial conviction did not warrant an other than honorable Additionally, the Board considered your contention discharge. that your diagnosed schizophrenia was the cause of your periods The Board concluded these factors and contentions were of UA. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...