DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
TJR
Docket No:
29 January 2003
4638-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 23 January 2003.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record,
and applicable statutes, regulations,
and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient
to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice.
You enlisted in the Navy on 17 October 1984 at the age of 19. On
15 January 1985 you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for
larceny and were awarded a $300 forfeiture of pay, a portion of
which was suspended for six months.
The punishment imposed was reduction to
paygrade E-l, a
On 7 October 1987 you
On 2 December 1986 and again on 29 January 1987 you received NJP
for three periods of absence from your appointed place of duty
and failure to obey a lawful order.
received NJP for two periods of absence from your appointed place
of duty.
$658 forfeiture of pay, and restriction and extra duty for 30
days.
months.
your fifth NJP for two periods of absence from your appointed
place of duty, two specifications of failure to obey a lawful
order, and dereliction of duty.
duty and restriction for 45 days and a $658 forfeiture of pay.
The suspended reduction awarded at the 7 October 1987 NJP was
also vacated at this,time.
Shortly thereafter, on 28 October 1987, you received
The reduction and forfeitures were suspended for six
The punishment imposed was extra
On 29 October 1987 you were notified of pending administrative
separation action by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of
misconduct and commission of a serious offense.
waived your right to consult with legal counsel and to present
On 4 November
your case to an administrative discharge board.
1987 your commanding officer recommended an other than honorable
discharge by reason of misconduct due a pattern of misconduct and
commission of a serious offense.
discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by
reason of misconduct, and on 25 November 1987 you were so
discharged.
On 11 November 1987 the
At that time you
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your youth and immaturity, post service conduct, and your
contentions that your problems were caused by alcoholism and you
were having marital problems.
these factors and contentions were not sufficient to warrant
recharacterization of your discharge because of your repetitive
misconduct which resulted in five
Further, there is no
evidence in the record to support your contentions, and you
submitted no such evidence.
been denied.
Accordingly, your application has
Nevertheless, the Board concluded
NJPs.
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished
upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 01116-07
Documentary material Considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 12 May 1987 after four years of prior honorable service. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00592-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 October 2005. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 10956-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, on 18 December 1986, this suspended sentence was vacated due to your continued misconduct, specifically, a four day period of UA.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 06323-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The reporting senior stated, in part, as follows: (Member) requires direct supervision to get satisfactory results.... he takes no ownership of any actions and constantly makes excuses for his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09216-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 31 January 1984 at age 18. On 31 July 1986 you received NJP for assault...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09492-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 8 June 1981 the discharge authority directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05149-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2001. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your record also reflects that on 9 December 1974 you submitted a written request for an undesirable discharge in order to avoid trial by court-martial for two periods of UA totalling four days, absence from your...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 08138-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 07531-03
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, he Board determined that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the NavySeptember 1972 a and session without disciplinary incident un ii 25...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 09184-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 3 October 1985 at age 18 and served without disciplinary incident until 11...