Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04624-02
Original file (04624-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

S

2 NAVY ANNE

X

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

LCC:ddj
Docket No: 4624-02
20 August 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session,
considered your application on 20 August 2002.
Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

 

N130G/02U0397 of 7 August 2002, a copy of

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of-regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,
applicant to

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

OFFICE OF   THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000 NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON. D.C. 20350-2000

N130G/02u0397

Ser 
7 

Aug 2002

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTIONS

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

/

Subj:

Ref:

Title 10, Section 1401
Title 10, Section 1407
Title 10, Section 513

(a) U.S.C.,
(b) U.S.C.,
(c) U.S.C.,
(d) Public Law 99-348
(e) Public Law 96-342
(f) Public Law 96-513

Encl

(1) BCNR Case File 

Record

#046

24-O 2 w/Microfiche Service

Per your request,

1.
enclosure (1) is provided.

the following recommendation concerning

L.

Enclosure 

(l), the petitioner is requesting special

3
consideration for wavier of his Date of Initial Entry into
Military Service(DIEMS) date of 18 March 1986 to be eligible to
elect the Career Status Bonus under REDUX pay system to prevent
financial hardship.

"first became a member"

In accordance with reference (a) through   (f),

"DIEMS" pertains to the earliest date of member's

Background:
3.
the meaning of
element 
lar or reserve component of the uniformed
enlistment 
"Record of Military Processing
s DD form 1966
services.
in his permanent service
Armed Forces of the United States"
record that he enlisted in the United States Navy on 18 March
1986.

and the corresponding data

’

The National Defense Authorization Acts of 1981 and 1986
4.
excluded members who were already in the regular and reserve
service from the new retired pay computational methods in order
to avoid changing the rules and adversely effecting retention.
The same is true of the National Defense Authorization Act of
Fiscal Year 2000, which repealed the REDUX Retired Pay system and
placed affected members under the High-3 retirement system.

Subj:

REQUEST FOR COMMENTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS  

ICC

However,

it offered those who initially became members on or
1986 the option to elect the Career Status Bonus
15th anniversary of active duty if they agreed

5.
after August 1,
and REDUX on their  
to remain continuous on active duty to their  
20th anniversary.
Since the petitioner's DIEMS date proceeds August 1, 1986, he is
not eligible for the Career Status Bonus and REDUX Retired Pay
System.

Therefore,

6.
reauest.

N130G recommends disapproval of the petitioner's

1

Medical Pay Section  

(N130G)



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00817-02

    Original file (00817-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In atldition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or In this connection, the Board substantially conct~rrec-1 with the co~ii~nents contained in injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable niaterial...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 04293-03

    Original file (04293-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 July 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Entr=DEP) Date (ADSD) of 25 August 1986. is requesting to change his DIEMS date from his Delayed date of 14 July 1986 to his Active Duty Service 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00438-03

    Original file (00438-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. A Career Status Bonus (CSB) GENADMIN Notification message was on 31 December 2001 offering him the REDUX retired pay system and receive a 2. released...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02142-03

    Original file (02142-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. would be irrevocable by law on his 15th CSB GENADMIN N learly notified ssage as well as that he was under The Career Status Bonus (CSB) Election Form,...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02422-03

    Original file (02422-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 2422-03 24 June 2003 Dea r This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02530-03

    Original file (02530-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory N130G/03U0386 of 6 June 2003, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. released...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 03377-03

    Original file (03377-03.PDF) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by OPNAV memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. the following recommendation concerning enclosure (1) A Career Status Bonus (CSB) GENADMIN Notification message was 2. m on 12 August 2002 offering him the released...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02102-03

    Original file (02102-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 June 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. on 29 July 2002 offering him the opportunity ired pay system ve a $30,000 CSB by has an active duty message as well as NAVADMI and his command that he...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00300-03

    Original file (00300-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 Ser which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 01922-03

    Original file (01922-03.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 LCC:ddj Docket No: 1922-03 11 June 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. 1552 Encl: (1) (2) (3) DD Form 149 w/attachments CNO memorandum 7220 Ser Subject’s naval record N130G/03U0360 of 27 May 2003 Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as...