DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
WMP
Docket No:
26 November 2002
4644-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 20 November 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
of your application,
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
together with all material submitted in
Your allegations of error and
I
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
You served without incident until 18
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 19 April 1982
for four years at age 18.
March 1983, when you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for
two instances of destruction of government property, assault,
and urinating in a shower.
of extra duty.
be at your appointed place of duty and disobedience of a petty
paygrade E-l
officer.
Your record further
and 45 days of
shows that on 31 May 1983 your designation as a disbursing clerk
(DK) was removed due to incompetency.
The punishment imposed was 21 days
On 1 April 1983 you received NJP for failure to
The punishment imposed was reduction to
restiction and extra duty.
On 24 April 1984, you received NJP for disobeying a lawful
The punishment imposed was 7 days of extra duty.
order.
November 1984 you received NJP for failure to be at your
On 9
appointed place of duty.
to
paygrade E-2 and 30 days of restriction.
The punishment imposed was reduction
Your record further shows that you received NJP on 14 February
1985 for wrongful use of marijuana.
30 days of correctional custody and forfeitures of $150 per
month for two months.
The forfeitures were suspended for a
On 2 May 1985 you again received NJP for
period of six months.
The punishment imposed was
wrongful use of marijuana.
forfeitures of $310 per month for two months, 45 days of
restriction and extra duty,
The punishment imposed was
and reduction to
paygrade E-l.
On 6 May 1985, you were notified that separation action was
being initiated by reason of misconduct due to a pattern of
misconduct and drug abuse.
of your procedural rights.
You were advised of and waived all
On 9 May 1985, your commanding officer forwarded the separation
action, recommending an other than honorable discharge, to the
Commander, Naval Military Personnel Command (CNMPC).
1985 CNMPC directed an other than honorable discharge by reason
On 24 May 1985, you were so
of misconduct due to drug abuse.
discharged.
On 18 May
However, the Board concluded that the record fully
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors such as your youth and
immaturity.
supported the other than honorable discharge, based on six
NJP's, two of which were for wrongful use of marijuana.
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
it is important to keep in mind that
You are entitled to have
In this regard,
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02585-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370.510 0 WMP Docket No: 19 August 2002 2585-02 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United States Code section 1552. considered your A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 14 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05130-02
(NJP) for conspiracy, reckless driving, false The record further shows that you received NJP on 11 September 1984 for a seven day period of unauthorized absence, from 30 August to 6 September 1984. paygrade E-3. reduction to The punishment imposed was On 11 June 1985 you again received NJP for wrongful use of marijuana. However, the Board found that the other than honorable discharge NJP's and use of marijuana.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05483-00
absence from your appointed Your record further reflects that on 8 March 1985 you received NJP for wrongful use of marijuana and were awarded a $600 forfeiture of pay, extra duty for 14 days, and a reduction to paygrade E-2. Subsequently, you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 01021-02
of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when you received non-judicial The punishment imposed was a On 1 October 1984 you received a second NJP for failure On 4 May 1985 a psychiatric evaluation was conducted at the request of your command due to your inability to control your temper. 45 days of restriction and extra duty and a On 17 October 1985 you again received NJP On 13 November...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 07456-05
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 May 2006. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 15 April 1986 the discharge authority approved this recommendation and directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 05456 11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 March 2012. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09615-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction df Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 April 2003. The punishment imposed was forfeitures of $275 per month for two months and 45 days of restriction and extra duty On 22 April 1982 you were counseled concerning your past performance and warned that further misconduct could result in processing for a less than honorable discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03729-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and Board. of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Naval Military Personnel Command On 23 June Prior to your discharge on 23 June 1987, a Veterans Administration (VA)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00011-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03670-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. recommended an other than honorable discharge by reason of Your commanding officer then After being The discharge authority approved misconduct due to drug abuse. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...