NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03198-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 April 2002. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03201-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03204-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. Subsequently, there was a two day period of Prier to A special court-martial convened on 10 April 1961 and convicted you of two periods of unauthorized absence...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03205-02
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Series of Documents (3) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of 1. filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, corrected to show advanced when first eligible. reviewed 3. (2), the Board finds the existence of an injustice warranting the Docket No: 3205-02 RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: a. Petitioner was advanced to paygrade E-4 effective 16 April 2001. b.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03209-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Every recruit is not offered nor receives an EB is guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4. does not have an EB contract in his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03210-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and session, considered your application on 22 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in applicable to the proceedings of this Board. accordance’ivith administrative regulations and procedures Documentary material considered by the Board After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03213-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAV Y ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 JRE Docket No: 32 8 October 2002 13-02 This is in reference to your provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552. application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03215-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. THE PEB RECORD REVIEW PANEL CAMP CONSIDERED THE CASE ON 18 NOVEMBER 1996 AND FOUND THE MEMBER UNFIT UNDER V.A. THE MEMBER .
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03215-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. This was more than a month after you had reenlisted. 2. reenlistment date of 13 August 1999 to 04 October 1999 for four years.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03217-02
A three-~nember panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 May 2002. The medical board report indicates that you had undc:.guw an osteotomy in 1979 to cc)rr'Cd dysplasia of your left hip, and that you had been active in sports and had little difficulty with your hip since that time. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03219-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 October 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03224-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. There is no indication in the available records that you were unfit by reason of physical...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03225-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Your conduct marks average was 2.0. such as your prior honorable In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, service and your contention, in effect, that you have...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03227-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 May 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03229-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 23 March 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03236-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03241-02
Consequently, on the applicant to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, demonstrate the existence of probable material error or the burden is in.justice. SRB entitlement for the petitioner's reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03242-01
consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In this regard, and it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. master program E in healt h ’s (c) t Each reference clearly states a qualifyin a concentration in health care selected did not include a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03244-02
You requested that your Meritorious Service Medal be removed from your naval record, or that you be awarded the Legion of Merit (LOM) award. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 9 July 2002, a copy of which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03249-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 RlEH:yrj Docket No: July 2002 9 3349-02 CONCLUSIO N Upon review contents of enclosure following corrective action. and consideration of all (2), the Pdartl the t‘intls ot’ evidence llie existence recoi-(I, ai1 01‘ and especially in light of the injustice warranting the RECOMMENDATION : That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, to show that: Docket No: 3249-02 a. Pursuant...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03250-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy S MEH:ddj Docket No: 23 April 2002 3250-02 Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to establish 3354. entitlment to a zone “A” Selective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03253-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, an enlisted member in the Naval Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a better characterization of service, separation code and reenlistment code. At the time of Petitioner's separation an average of 2.0 in all the ITA marks assigned during an enlistment was required for an honorable characterization of service. The Board notes his period of good service from 14 April 1998 to 17...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03259-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 mh MEH: Docket No: 9 July 2002 3259-02 Dear This is in reference to your application provisions of title 10 of the Ilnitctl States Code, section 1552. iOr correcticm 01‘ your naval record pursuant to the ot‘ the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive panel three-nlember- A session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with proceedings of this Board. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03264-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on Mr.- petition to correct his record to reflect his eligibility...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03265-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 MEH:mh Docket No: 9 July 2002 326542 This is in reference to provisions of title 10 of the lJnited States ( ‘ode. section 01‘ your 1552. your application for correction naval record pursuant to the (lorrcction of Naval Bo;ml al~l~lication for Kecords, sitting in executive 011 9 July 2002. Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the session, considered...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03265-30
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03269-02
This is the only nonqualifying year in your Marine Corps The CRCR shows that in the anniversary year ending Your Career Retirement Credit Report (CRCR) shows that you first entered the Marine Corps Reserve on 30 September 1982, and that at the end of your anniversary year on 29 September 2002, you will have completed 19 qualifying years of service for reserve retirement. and you request that sufficient points be moved into the anniversary year ending 29 September 1987 to make that...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03274-02
In your application you are requesting recharacterization of your discharge to honorable, a change in the reason for discharge and an RE-1 reenlistment code. He has no alcohol problems. Therefore, the Board found the evaluation was insufficient to overcome the diagnoses of alcohol dependence made prior to referral for alcohol rehabilitation, When you completed the inpatient rehabilitation program.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03276-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You received the bad conduct discharge on 15 The court sentenced you to confinement at However, the Board concluded that these factors were In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03278-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. laims that when he enlisted the recruiter said he however the bonus was not He requests to receive an EB for 4.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03280-00
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petitioner submits is a letter from Petitioner's regimental sergeant major, Sergeant Major Contrary to Petitioner's assert "yet another dimension" to the While Sergeant Major -elates first hand knowledge of Petitioner's first NJP and the subsequent investigation of that NJP, this information cas:. w expresses...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03284-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, tiled enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, i n effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show that Petitioner was authorizies an extension of the one (1) year period in which to ship his household goods (HHGs) at governnient expense incident to his transfer to the Fleet Reserve. The Board, consisting of Messrs. George, Goldsniith, and Mr. Pfeiffer, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03288-02
The Petitioner ’s determined that evidence of record. d and, pursuant to its regulations, naval records. CONCLUSIO N review ailtl Upon contents of enclosure following corrective action.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03301-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S HD: hd Docket No: 03301-01 15 February 2002 Dear Command This is in reference to your application dated 20 April 2001 for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United States Code, section 1552, seeking removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 97 and 98 Lieutenant Commander Staff Selection Boards, and reinstatement to active duty as a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03302-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03306-00
stated that you were suffering from PTSD after returning from Vietnam and that the Board should take this into account when considering your application. His troubles did 5. his AWOL periods he was evaluation done prior to discharge. We really have no collateral information regarding these 20 years, except for his own report.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03309-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of With all material submitted in support Your allegations of error and After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03310-01
had completed 14 years, Petitioner was so discharged At that time he 10 months and 18 days of active service. The victim was present at Captain's Mast I found her statement (He) was, ..'I . concurs with the commanding officer in his letter that Petitioner's rights were not violated and, therefore, the ADB properly found misconduct occurred.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03313-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 31 August 1954 you received NJP for failure to The punishment imposed was The punishment imposed was 14 days of that On 14 September 1954, you were convicted by summary martial of breaking restriction. convicted of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03315-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together'with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The offenses...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03318-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your request were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge because of your repetitive and lengthy periods of UA. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03322-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 3 August 1983, your record Although your record further reflects that you were an unauthorized absentee from 18 to 20 October 1983, a period of two days, it does not indicate if disciplinary action was taken. However,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03327-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. However, the Board concluded that these factors Therefore, the Board Applicable regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code when an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03332-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JRE Docket No: 3332-01 8 February 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. He contends that his enlistment was not erroneous, because he disclosed his pre-service knee injury when he applied for enlistment. That Petitioner’s naval record be corrected to show, as an exception to policy, that RE-3E, vice the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03349-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. At that time you denied suicidal ideation On 19 February 1982, after undergoing a You were sentenced to a $900 forfeiture paygrade E-l. On 12 April 1982 you...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03350-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 May 2002. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03352-00
lOO%, or that your reenlistment code A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 February 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03353-02
e. On 13 April 1992, while attending level III alcohol rehabilitation treatment, Petitioner received NJP for failure to be at his appointed place of duty and disobeying a lawful order Punishment imposed was forfeiture of $100 from a petty officer. f. Petitioner was notified on 2 June 1992 that administrative separation action was being initiated by reason of misconduct due to commission of a serious offense and alcohol rehabilitation failure. g- On 23 June 1992, the commanding officer...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03354-02
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Case Summary (3) Subject's naval record The Board, consisting of Messrs. Zsalman, Pfeiffer, and Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member of the Navy, applied to this Board requesting that his reenlistment code be changed. Punishment imposed was forfeitures paygrade E-2, and The restriction and extra f& two months, reduction to Petitioner served without .1990 for d. On 8 October 1994, Petitioner received NJP...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03355-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 December 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The forfeitures, extra duty and restriction were On 5 August 1998, you were notified that separation action was being initiated by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure. Consequently, when applying for a correction...