DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAV
Y
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
MEH:ddj
Docket No:
17 September 2002
3215-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 17 September 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
to the proceedings of this Board.
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by NPC memorandum 1160 Ser 81
attached.
&th administrative regulations and procedures applicable
l/ of 22 August 20002, a copy of which is
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board did not concur with the comments contained in the
advisory opinion. NAVADMIN
effective date of 1 October 1999. This was more than a month after you had reenlisted.
Therefore you could not have been counseled to delay your reenlistment.
sufficient grounds to change your reenlistment date.
denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
271/99 was not released until 30 September 1999, with an
Accordingly, your application has been
Your hindsight is not
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
Docket No.
3215-02
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all
official records. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the
burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENTOF
THE NAV Y
N AVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
MILLINGTON T
5720 INTEGRITY DRIVE
38055-0000
N
1160
Ser
22 Aug 2002
811/
MgMORANDUM F OR
CEJAIRMAN,
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Vi.a:
Subj:
Ref:
PERS-OOZCB
BCNR P ET IT ION
ICO
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 19 Mar 02
(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
(c)
NAVADMIN
132/99
271/99
Encl:
(1)
BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend approval to
rhe
a .
The petitioner reenlisted on 13 August 1999 for six
years and received a zone
(b).
offered in reference
the zone
and SEAOS of 04 October 2001.
"A" SRB entitlement for the ETSW rate
The petitioner received 46 months of
"A" SRB entitlement due to his EAOS of 04 October 1999
b.
The petitioner's reenlistment contract reflected 48
months obliserve vice 72 months and the SRB payment was adjusted
accordingly.
C .
Reference
(c) released on 30 September 1.999 with an
effective date of 01 October 1999 allowed service members that
obliserve 24 months beyond their inoperative extension to receive
the SRB entitlement without monetary loss.
d.
The petitioner requests to change the reenlistment date
of 13 August 1999 to 04 October 1999 and receive the zone "A" SRB
entitlement without the monetary loss of the 24 months extension.
2.
reenlistment date of 13 August 1999 to 04 October 1999 for four
years.
“A" SRB with an award level of 5.0 for the
accordance with references
This change will entitle the member to 48 monhts of zone
ETSW(OOO0) rate in
recommend change the petitioner's
In view of the above,
(b) and (c).
This is an advisory memorandum to
3.
by the Board for Correction of Naval
Enclosure
(1.) is returned.
reference
Records
(BCNR)
(a) for
only.
use
Reenlistment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01302-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. d. The petitioner requests to cancel the reenlistment date of 02 July 1999 and effect a reenlistment upon the completion date of MA “A” school training and receive the zone “C” SRB entitlement in reference (c). This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02246-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. However, reference (b) was in effect at the time petitioner requests to effect the reenlistment date.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00752-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08501-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 Petitioner's - Reference (c), released 20 Nov 1998 with an effective date Dee 1998 carried the zone "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 of 01 at an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05771-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. In addition, the Board considered the advisory After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. orders in June 2000 and was in a student status on 01 August 2000. d. The petitioner was advised that he...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01407-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00439-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. - Reference (c) was released over 30 days after his 15 Ott Therefore the petitioner could not have...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 00658-04
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The petitioner passed through the zone “A” SRB window on 22 January 1998. The petitioner requests to backdate the 18 May 1998 reenlistment contract to 22 January 1998 and receive the zone “A” SRB offered in reference (b) .
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08446-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) Enclosure (1) is returned.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00120-99
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 NPC-815 of 14 April 1999, a copy of which is attached.