DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
S
.
2 NAVY ANNE
X
WASHINGTON DC 20370.510
0
CRS
Docket No: 3276-02
10 September 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United
States Code, Section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application, together
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
'hith all material submitted in support
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 18
June 1979 after about ten years of prior active service. A
special court-martial convened on 2 March 1982 and found you
guilty of possession of marijuana on two occasions, and transfer
and sale of marijuana.
hard labor for three months, reduction in pay grade, and a bad
conduct discharge.
August 1983.
You received the bad conduct discharge on 15
The court sentenced you to confinement at
However, the Board concluded that these factors were
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all
potentially mitigating factors, such as your youth and
immaturity.
not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge
due to the seriousness of the drug-related offenses.
the foregoing, the Board concluded that no change to the
discharge is warranted.
denied.
furnished upon
Accordingly, your application has been
The names and votes of the members of the panel will be
Based on
requegt.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
You are entitled to have the
favorable action cannot be taken.
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03807-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 7 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You received the bad conduct discharge on 16 October 1984. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00022-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 May 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 30 September 1976 you were released from confinement and placed on appellate leave pending the review of your bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04862-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You received the bad conduct discharge on 8 May The court sentenced you to confinement at hard Portions of the confinement In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed all potentially mitigating...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00103-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Navy Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 April 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. The record reflects that you served without incident until December 1980 when you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for possession of marijuana.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 09159-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 March 2011. The Board concluded that those factors were insufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge, given your extensive disciplinary record, and the absence of credible evidence that you suffered from PTSD while in the Marine Corps. Comsequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 03474-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 October 2001 at age 17. Subsequently, your request for discharge was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03454-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. requesting execution of my bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 07358-09
R three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 July 2010. The Board found that you reenlisted in the Marine Corps on 15 February 1973. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06039-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. convicted by SPCM of the four specifications of disobedience and sentenced to confinement at hard labor for 75 days, a $744 forfeiture of pay, reduction to discharge (BCD). 1978 you were convicted by SPCM of two periods...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 00344-06
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.You enlisted in the Navy on 11 September 1975 at age 18. It is clear from the record that several...