DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARDFORCORRECTION OF NAVALRECORDS
2
NAVY
ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
WMP
Docket No:
11 December 2002
3355-02
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the
United States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 11 December 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application,
together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
The Board found that you enlisted in the Navy on 13 November
1996 for four years at age 18.
The record reflects that you
served without incident until 18 June 1997, when you received
nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for failure to obey a lawful order.
The punishment imposed was 60 days of restriction.
The record
further shows that you received alcohol rehabilitation treatment
in July 1997, and were counseled and warned concerning your
alcohol abuse as a minor and the consequences of further alcohol
involvement.
The record reflects that on 5 August 1998 you received NJP for
failure to obey a lawful order and adultery.
The punishment
imposed was a reduction to
and extra duty, and forfeitures of $519 per month for two
paygrade E-2, 45 days of restriction
months.
suspended for a period of six months.
The forfeitures, extra duty and restriction were
On 5 August 1998, you were notified that separation action was
being initiated by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure.
You were advised of and waived all of your procedural rights.
On 13 August 1998, you received an honorable discharge by reason
of alcohol rehabilitation failure and were assigned an RE-4
reenlistment code.
However, the Board concluded that your honorable
In its review of your application the Board carefully weighed
all potentially mitigating factors such as your age and
immaturity.
discharge for alcohol rehabilitation failure was appropriate, as
was the assignment of a RE-4 reenlistment code, which is
required by regulation when an individual is discharged for
alcohol rehabilitation failure.
has been denied.
panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and votes of the members of the
Accordingly, your application
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence or other matter not previously considered by
the Board.
it is important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official
naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
You are entitled to have
In this regard,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03147-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 12 August 1999, your proposed administrative separation was forwarded to the discharge authority recommending a general discharge, which was approved by the discharge authority on 7 You were so discharged on 9...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2004 | 01262-04
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of p7rohahl material error or injus i~e.The Board found that you enlisted in the Marine Corps on 31 April 1997 at age 19. You served...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04971-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. punishment imposed was 10 days of extra duty. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02377-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TJR Docket No: 2377-02 4 October 2002 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552. A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 1 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 07727-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considere@a your -application on 2 August 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Nevertheless, the Board concluded these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge or a change of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00537-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 January 2003. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 10 May 2001 you submitted an appeal to The punishment imposed was a On 2 June 2001, your suspended separation action was vacated based on your continued misconduct, however, final action of the separation was held in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07472-01
You were so discharged on 28 December 1998 and assigned You were advised of your procedural Your desire to reenlist due to recent events is Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals separated by reason of entry level performance and conduct. were treated no differently than others separated under similar circumstances, the Board could find no error or injustice in your assigned reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 09225-07
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 November 2008. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. However, on 9 June 1995, you received nonjudicial punishment (NJP) for failure to go to your appointed place of duty.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 02001-03
Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02178-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, application on 14 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. 2 convicted by summary court-martial On 19 February 1980, you were of an unauthorized absence from 25 January to 29 January 1980, a failure to go to appointed place of duty; period of four days; missing ship's movement; The punishment...