NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02948-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02969-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. nonjudicial punishments were more than sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02976-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TJR Docket No: 2976-01 23 October 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. total UA and his periods of confinement are causes for concern, the Board also notes that he served a very considerable portion of his enlistment, and a good part of this service at sea during the Korean Conflict. That Petitioner's naval record be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02982-02
The Board found that your request ,action, you In its review of potentially mitigating factors, a better discharge. yorir application the Board carefully weighed all such as your youth and desire for The Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct and especially your request for The Board believed discharge to avoid trial for the offenses. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02983-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently,...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02987-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 6 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. marks assigned for the period 1 February 1992 to 25 July 1992 are not entered on the page 9. In addition, the page 9 clearly shows that you were not eligible for reenlistment on 25 July 1992. that your performance either...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02990-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 12 AU8 2002 02UO428 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #02990-02 with microfiche service record 1. entitled to that payment upon completion of his He is not entitled to an EB College Kicker has a valid EB Contract in the amount of Kicker Program was not in...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02992-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a filed an application with 1. former enlisted member in the Navy, this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show and involuntary separation program designator (SPD) code vice the voluntary SPD code now of record. SPD code of KDG now of record Therefore, the SPD code should be changed to The Board also notes that Petitioner However, given the JDG vice the The Board further...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02993-02
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 31 May 2002, and the memorandum for the record dated 18 August 2003, copies of which are attached. Lieutenant Colonel completed the Marine Corps Command and Staff course in 1995.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02997-01
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO dated 27 December 200 which is attached. Documentary material considered by the Board 1, a copy of After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice warranting approval of your request to award you the Purple Heart Medal. D.C. 20350-200 N 0 IN REPLY REFER T...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02998-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. considered your application on After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03000-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. your request was granted on 25 March 1976 and, as a result of this action, you were spared the stigma of a court-martial conviction and the potential penalties of...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03021-02
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E N A V Y B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 N A V Y ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 302 1-02 16 April 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mackey , Pauling, and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and i11.justice on 9 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03026-01
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show the Pay Entry Base Bate (PEBD) was established as the date the Petitioner signed the documents for the Officer Candidate Course (OCC) or the Platoon Leaders Course (PLC), whichever Program applied to the Petitioner. The Board, consisting of George, Goldsmith, and Pfeiffer, reviewed...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03029-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE N A V Y BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F NAVAL R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 J LP: ddj Docket No: 3029-02 16 April 2002 Froni: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Mackey, Pauling, and Ms. McCorniick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 9 April 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03032-02
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H E NAVY B O A R D F O R C O R R E C T I O N OF N A V A L R E C O R D S 2 NAVY ANNEX W A S H I N G T O N D C 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 JLP:ddj Docket No: 3032-02 10 September 2003 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03036-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 January 2002. average conduct mark of 4.0 was required for a fully honorable characterization of service at the time of separation. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03041-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. On 21 August 1983 the discharge authority then directed an other than honorable discharge by reason of misconduct, and on 31 August 1983 you were so discharged. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03046-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. leave, you were found to be competent to understand the bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03049-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together-with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03051-99
Petitioner's discharge as recommended. before a BOI. Petitioner's argument that he should not have been discharged because CG MCCDC had recommended against processing him for separation is without merit.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03053-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show he elected Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) former spouse coverage under the insurable interest category, and then elected former spouse coverage under the spouse category. The Board, consisting of Mr. Beckett, Ms. McCormick, and Ms. Nofziger, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03055-02
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 JLP:yrj Docket No: IO July 2002 3055-02 Ret-: Encl: (ki) (1) (2) (3) of error and injustice, finds as tOllou~s: Before applying to this law existing under and ~ Ikw-d regulalions l’otitioiic‘r njithin ~sliaustetl all administrative remedies the Dcprtnlent of the Navy . Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised l’roccdures of the Board for Correction of Naval review Regulations, Section 723.6(c))...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03056-02
find what marks Petitioner should In view of the above, the Board directs the “N/A/N/A, ” and RECOMMENDATION: That Petitioner ’s naval record be corrected, where appropriate, by changing his “2.9/2.9 ” to “N/A/N/A ”; and that his profiadiencyiconduct marks of 7 October 1959 from final marks of 19 December 1959 be changed accordingly: conduct from proficiency from “4.3” to “4.6.” “4.4” to “4.5” and b. as assigned PRO/CON marks of Aug59 to 70ct59 by his commanding b. The Board for Correction...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03057-02
and further stated that you On 22 February 2002 you stated that That same day, you were diagnosed Based on the psychiatric determination that you were unsuitable for service and the false statements you made at the time of your enlistment, you were processed for an administrative separation. You state in your application, enlisted and then told other lies in order to be separated. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03072-02
DEPARTMENTOFTHE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD X 2 NAVY ANNE S WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 LCC:ddj Docket No: 3072-02 11 September 2002 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj : REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 10 September 2002 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03075-02
1552 Encl: (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) NPC memo of 19 June 2002 (3) Subject ’s naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject ’s former spouse, hereinafter referred 1. to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show timely written request for conversion from spouse to former spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). The Board, consisting of Mr. Agresti, Mr. Frankfurt, and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03087-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 27 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. the Board found that these factors were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your record of misconduct and especially your request...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03096-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 18 October 2002. February 1999, the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) made preliminary findings that you were unfit for duty because of the depressive disorder, which it rated at 10% disabling. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03100-02
JLP: ddj Docket No: 3 30 October 2002 100-02 DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected to show entitlement t the Navy College Fund...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03108-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2002. your discharge was erroneous or unjust, the Board was unable to recommend any corrective action in your case. In this regard, it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03109-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD S 2 NAVY ANNE X WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 TJR:jdh Docket No: 3109-01 8 October 2002 sitting in executive session, A three-member panel of the Board, considered your application and recommended that your naval record be corrected as set forth in the attached report dated 26 October 2001. designated representative of the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Manpower and Reserve Affairs conducted an independent review of the Board's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03113-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. noted that unlike the VA, which rates all conditions it classifies as “service connected”, the military departments are permitted to assign disability ratings only to those conditions which render a service member...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03121-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 October 2002. You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03126-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 July 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. The record reflects that on 30 March 1990 you received You reported to active duty on 18 April On 7 February 1991 the commanding officer recommended that you be separated with an honorable discharge by reason of alcohol...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03128-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 10 September 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. concluded that a 33 day period of unauthorized absence was sufficient to support the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03130-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. At that time you were not recommended for reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03134-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 January 2003. Reference (a) regarding former LC retirement rank to Former LCD requested comments and recommendations equest for restoration of his stment of his retirement pay. k As this fact will never The action requested by the petitioner should be denied 3. because these issues were considered by the Assistant Secretary of the Navy when his retirement was...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03142-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 November 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this material considered by the Board consisted of Board. paygrade E-l, restriction and extra The On 16 August 1999 you were notified of pending administrative separation action by reason of misconduct due to drug abuse. ...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03147-01
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. In this regard, it is important Consequently, Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAV N AVY...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03147-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 October 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. On 12 August 1999, your proposed administrative separation was forwarded to the discharge authority recommending a general discharge, which was approved by the discharge authority on 7 You were so discharged on 9...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03148-02
1552 (1) DD Form 149 w/attachments (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. commissioned officer in the Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected by changing the narrative reason for separation and Separation Program Designator (SPD) assigned at the time of his discharge from enlisted status. Since it was clearly improper to require recoupment of the SRB, the Board...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03149-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive . Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03152-01
your application, thereof, your naval record, and policies. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of together with all material submitted in support and applicable statutes, regulations, A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 February 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this After careful and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03152-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 16 July 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. The reference requests an advisory opinion on petition to correct his...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03162-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 13 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of Board. were not sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given your repeated and lengthy periods of unauthorized The Board-found that these factors and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03167-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 24 September 2002. reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. time from 22 December 2000 until 19 January 2001. for...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03170-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 February 2002. It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be MEMORANDUM NAVAL RECORDS ICO .db EX- Ref: (a) ltr EBM, Docket # 3170-01, dtd 05 JUN 01 File Chairman, BCNR, BCNR Service Record (limited) Medical Record (limited) Civilian Psychiatric Record .ve-rbal ‘request and (3) (4) Per your in accordance with ref...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03175-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 9 January 2003. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03189-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 28 August 2002. injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures'applicable to the proceedings of this Board. You were sentenced to confinement at hard forfeiture of $413 per month for six paygrade E-l, and a bad conduct discharge. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, existence of probable...