DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
JLP: ddj
Docket No: 3278-02
4 September 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 4 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420
which is attached.
N130D1/02U0436 of 12 August 2002, a copy of
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board. In this regard, it is important
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
Consequently,
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
OFFICE OF THE CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS
2000 NAVY PENTAGON
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000
,-lkPLY
N
ODl/
542 0
N13
12 Aug
KlOO2
TO
iiiFkR
02UO436
MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj:
IN THE CASE
Encl:
(1) BCNR case file
#03278-02 with microfiche service record
ollowing provides comment and recommendation on
petition.
N130 recommends denial of
2.
Enlistment Bonus (EB).
petition
for an
3.
Program
(DEP)
would receive an enlistment bonus,
recorded in his contract.
enlisting in the AECF program.
enlisted in the Navy through the Delayed Entry
on 18 June 2001 and volunteered for the Advanced
In his petition,
puter Field Program (AECF).
laims that when he enlisted the recruiter said he
however the bonus was not
He requests to receive an EB for
4. EB is not an entitlement,
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to
enlist in critical skills.
quotas provided by the Commander,
the Enlisted Community Managers,
accession seats.
The EB program is budgeted based on
Navy Recruiting Command and
not by the number of "A" School
but a recruiting tool used at the
Every recruit is not offered nor receives an
anteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4.
oes not have an EB contract in his service record
and therefore is not entitled to an EB.
5. BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned
herewith as enclosure (1).
Head,
Programs Branch
Enlisted Bonus
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04972-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition; the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05739-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/ 29 Ott 2002 02UO582 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF, I T Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05739-02 with microfiche service record 1. Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is budgeted based Navy Recruiting Command and Seaman,mhas a valid EB Contract...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00249-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 26 November 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01056-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 03 October 2000. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20350-200 NAV Y N 0 S IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 23 Mar 200 0 0~0212 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07068-01
D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N130Dl/ 7 May 2002 02UO198 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #07068-01 with microfiche service record 1. entered the Delayed Entry Program , volunteered for the Advanced Command (RTC) on 22 September 2000. requests favorable action that'would allow payment of an Petty Officer EB College Kicker in addition to the EB that is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03955-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. D.C. 20350.2000 Y S N IN REPLY REFER 542 0 N130Dl/ 6 Aug 01 TO OlU1198 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF SEAMAN Encl: (1) BCNR case file #03955-01 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman 1. does not have an EB...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05754-02
In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. NAV Y IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130D1/02U0587 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: RECOMMENDATION SE OF PETTY OFFICER \ Encl: (1) BCNR case file #05754-02 with...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09933-02
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 30 September 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. D.C. 20350-2000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 5420 N13 OD1 / 03U0564 8 Aug 2003 MEMORANDUM FOR EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Encl: (1) BCNR case...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04692-01
Your allegations of error and injustice A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by of which is attached. EB contracts are guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4. and therefore is not entitled to an EB.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 04530-00
(AECF/AEF) On 26 January 2000 Seamen In his petition, Seamen - Carlson requests payment of EB Program and He shipped to active EB is paid upon successful completion EB is not an entitlement, but a recruiting tool used at the 4. discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to enlist in critical skills. member has started training in the skill for which they are to receive an EB, and receive an EB. EB.