Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03265-30
Original file (03265-30.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
ANNEX

NAVY 

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

JLP: ddj
Docket No:  
8 January 2002

3265-01

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 8 January 2002.
were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the
proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your
application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220  
which is attached.

In addition, the Board considered the advisory

N130C3/01U1195 of 3 August 2001, a copy of

Your allegations of error and injustice

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important
Consequently,

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE

  NAV Y

OFFICE OF THE

  CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATION

2000 NAVY PENTAGO
WASHINGTON. DC 20350.200

N

0

S

IN REPLY REFER TO

722 0
N130C3hlul195
3 Aug 2001

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION

OF NAVAL RECORDS

Via:

Assistant for BCNR Matters, Pers-OOXCB

Subj:

Encl:

(1) BCNR Case File  

Record

#03265-01  w/Microfiche Service

Per your request,

1.
enclosure (1) is provided.

the following recommendation

concerning

Enclosure (1) the petitioner's indicates that

2.
erroneously charged leave from 21 July 97 to 3 October 97 that was
submitted by his administrative office  
onboard USS FRANK CABLE AS
40.

he was

A review of enclosure (1) revealed insufficient information

3.
was provided from which to base an advisory opinion.
recommends approval of the petitioner's
of leave charged provided he submits documentation to prove the
checkage  was due to an administrate error.

request for reinstatement

N130C

‘.  

’

Allowances Section

(N130)

Pay and



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06730-01

    Original file (06730-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Enclosure (1) shows member served four years of active enlisted service from 1 June 1993 to 31 May 1997, Reserves until he joined the Air Force Reserves on 17 August 1998. a nator: Date of Report: 10/24/01 33 Statement of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03301-01

    Original file (03301-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD NAVY ANNEX 2 WASHINGTON DC 20370-510 0 S HD: hd Docket No: 03301-01 15 February 2002 Dear Command This is in reference to your application dated 20 April 2001 for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of title 10, United States Code, section 1552, seeking removal of your failures of selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 97 and 98 Lieutenant Commander Staff Selection Boards, and reinstatement to active duty as a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02121-01

    Original file (02121-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 14 August 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records Enclosure (1) is returned.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00511-01

    Original file (00511-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    considered the advisory opinions furnished by the Navy Personnel Command dated 5 April, 23 July and 16 August 2001, copies of which are attached. The member requests the removal of the following fitness reports. performance and making recommendations concerning promotion and assignment are the responsibilities of the reporting senior.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00833-01

    Original file (00833-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 7220 SER of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07975-01

    Original file (07975-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's request This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the (1) 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08099-01

    Original file (08099-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. recommend the petitioner's request This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the 3.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 05241-02

    Original file (05241-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. zone the petitioner's reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 07167-01

    Original file (07167-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 19 March 2002. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Board for Correction of Naval...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05051-01

    Original file (05051-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    You requested removal of a felony possession and distribution charge. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.