Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03209-02
Original file (03209-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION Of NAVAL RECORDS

2 NAVY ANNEX

WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100

JLP: ddj
Docket No: 3209-02
3 December 2002

This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the
provisions of title 10 of the United States Code, section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
session, considered your application on 3 December 2002. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable
to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies.
additio?, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 N  
which is attached.

130D1/02U0447  of 12 August 2002, a copy of

In 

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and votes of
the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

In this regard, it is important

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

Enclosure

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

OFFICE OF THE   CHIEF OF NAVAL OPERATIONS

2000 NAVY PENTAGON

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20350-2000

IN REPLY REFER TO

542 0
N130Dl/ 02210447
12 Aug 2002

MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF

NAVAL RECORDS

Subj:

IN THE CASE OF

..a.;

Encl:

(1) BCNR case file  

#03209-02 with microfiche service record

1.

The following provides comment and recommendation on Seaman

petition.

N130 recommends denial of Petty Officer

2 .
s_n Enlistment Bonus (EB).

petition for

Petty 

Officerm,entered  the Delayed Entry Program (DEP)

3 .
on 19 May 2001,
Computer Field (SECF) Program Guarantee,
with a $40,000 Navy College Fund Program Guarantee.
favorable action that would allow payment of an EB.

volunteered for the Submarine Electrical

and signed a contract

He requests

but a recruiting tool used at the

4. EB is not an entitlement,
discretion of recruiters and classifiers to entice individuals to
enlist in critical skills.
The EB program is budgeted based on
quotas provided by the Commander,
the Enlisted Community Managers, not by the number of "A" School
accession seats.
EB.
Petty Officer
record and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

Every recruit is not offered nor receives an
EB is guaranteed by an EB entry in Annex "A" to DD Form 4.
does not have an EB contract in his service

Navy Recruiting Command and

Petty Officer

5.
SECF bonus was automatic and did not need to be recorded on his
contract. Issues regarding the effectiveness of the individuals
Military Entrance Processing Station where Petty Officer
enlisted are deferred to the Inspector General for

claims that his recruiter stated the

investigation.

BCNR case file with microfiche service record is returned

6 .
herewith as enclosure (1).

Subj:

COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION

IN THE CASE OF

Head, Enlisted Bonus
Programs Branch



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02811-02

    Original file (02811-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 4 September 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. An EB College Kicker is an EB and is governed Every recruit is not offered nor The EB program is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00952-02

    Original file (00952-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DC 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 / Dl 0 13 N 22 Nov 2002 OZUO650 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 1 Subj: COMMENT AND RECOMMENDATION IN THE CASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #00952-02 with microfiche service record 1. for an Enlistment Bonus (EB). Navy Recruiting Command and the Petty does not have an EB contract in his service record is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00175-02

    Original file (00175-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20310-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 542 0 N130Dl/o2~0580 29 Ott 2002 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1) BCNR case file #00175-02 with microfiche service record The following provides comment and recommendation on Petty 1. Navy Recruiting Command and the 1160.6A "members enrolling in .

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02888-02

    Original file (02888-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 of which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. Petty Officer record and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02895-02

    Original file (02895-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum which is attached. when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. an Enlistment Bonus (EB).

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02407-02

    Original file (02407-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 17 December 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. D.C. 20370-5000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 1113 22 Nov 2002 OD/02U0660 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02626-02

    Original file (02626-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory applicable statutes, regulations and policies. opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. The EB program is budgeted based on Navy Recruiting Command and the and therefore is not entitled to an EB.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 04050-02

    Original file (04050-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Nuclear Field Program he was disqualified from the Petty Officer Reed requests favorable action that would allow payment of $4,000 EB . basic qualification for the EB, from required schools and who do not continue in the skill for Petty which enlisted, Officer did not complete the required...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00549-02

    Original file (00549-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your allegations of error and injustice with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the material considered by the Board consisted of your in support thereof, your naval record and In addition, the Board considered the advisory N13D1/02U0377 29 July 2002, a copy of which emorandum 5420 However, the Chief of Naval Operations has College Kicker in your pay account. MEMORANDUM FOR T E EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj ASE OF PETTY OFFICER Encl: (1)...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02990-02

    Original file (02990-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNO memorandum 5420 which is attached. D.C. 20350-2000 IN REPLY REFER TO 5420 N130Dl/ 12 AU8 2002 02UO428 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS Subj: CASE 0 Encl: (1) BCNR case file #02990-02 with microfiche service record 1. entitled to that payment upon completion of his He is not entitled to an EB College Kicker has a valid EB Contract in the amount of Kicker Program was not in...