DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD
NAVY
ANNEX
2
WASHINGTON DC 20370-510
0
S
TRG
Docket No: 3269-02
14 August 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 13 August 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application, together. with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
Your allegations of error and
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.
This is the only nonqualifying year in your Marine Corps
The CRCR shows that in the anniversary year ending
Your Career Retirement Credit Report (CRCR) shows that you first
entered the Marine Corps Reserve on 30 September 1982, and that
at the end of your anniversary year on 29 September 2002, you
will have completed 19 qualifying years of service for reserve
retirement.
29 September 1987, you were only credited with 15 membership
points.
career.
You contend in your application that after graduation from
Officer Candidate School that Marine Corps reservists were not
allowed to rejoin their units because they had to graduate from
college and be commissioned before they were allowed to earn
retirement points.
and you request that sufficient points be moved into the
anniversary year ending 29 September 1987 to make that year
qualifying for retirement.
You state that this policy has since changed,
The Board noted
that on 29 September 2002 you will complete 19
years of qualifying service and only need to earn 50 points and
complete the next anniversary year in order to be qualified for
reserve retirement at age 60.
anything, such as a mandatory discharge, that would prevent you
Since you have been treated no
from serving that year.
differently than many others who were kept from earning a
qualifying year at that time,
qualifying years, the Board concluded that a correction to your
record is not warranted.
and you can continue to earn
There does not appear to be
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
The names and
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
2
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03395-01
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100 TRG Docket No: 3395-01 29 June 2001 From: Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records To: Secretary of the Navy Subj: REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD OF iiiilliaaaiaiAtaaiaiamanisie', NE Ref: (a) Title 10 U.S.C. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a commissioned officer in the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 09631-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. commissioned officer in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to allow him the opportunity to earn reserve retirement. of the anniversary years ending on 17 August 2002 he has been credited with 15 years of qualifying service. That this Report of Proceedings be filed in Petitioner's b. naval record.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 04704-08
In addition, the Board considered an advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which is enclosed, and your rebuttal thereto dated 29 July 2008. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. As requested by the reference, we have audited your Career Retirement Credit Record (CRCR), enclosure (1), in order to establish your correct...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 08589-01
However, the Board believes that HQMC's suggestion Therefore, the Board concludes that Petitioner's record should be corrected by transferring sufficient retirement points from the excess over 50 in qualifying years into the three anniversary years ending on 14 July 1983, 14 July 1984 and 11 May 1992, to With this make those years qualifying for reserve retirement. correction, Petitioner will have 20 qualifying years and will be Since Petitioner is already eligible for retired pay at age...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 05507-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 September 2003. The Board noted that there are many individuals in the reserve component that have missed qualifying years by a few points who have had to serve additionai years in order to qualify for Since you can remain a member of the Marine Corps retirement. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06500-02
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record From: To: Subj: Ref: Encl: Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former enlisted member in the Marine Corps Reserve, filed an application with this Board requesting, in effect, that his record be corrected to show that he was credited with three years of reserve service not shown on his statement of service, that he transferred to the Retired Reserve vice being discharged on 9 August 1990, and transferred to the Retired...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05851-01
This would require the transfer of 17 retirement points into the anniversary year with 33 retirement points and continuation for an maximum of four years so he can earn the last six or eight years, whichever is required, in the reserve component. Therefore, given his many years of excellent service and the other circumstances of the case, the Board concludes that the record should be corrected to allow him to earn reserve retirement by completing eight years of qualifying service to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03808-02
However, he is not eligible for reserve retirement A review of e. Petitioner states in his application that he was Accordingly, he failed to earn a qualifying years in initially unaware of the requirement to qualify for reserve retirement. majority notes that Petitioner will have 20 qualifying years and would be eligible for retirement except for the requirement that the last eight years of qualifying service be in the reserve component. With this correction Petitioner Therefore, the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2007 | 04764-07
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies.After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.Your Career Retirement Credit Report (CRCR) shows that you have only been credited with 39...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 02697-01
1552 (1) Case Summary (2) Subject's naval record Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a 1. former warrant officer in the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he was not discharged on 1 January 2001 but he requests removal of a failure of selection to CW04 and missed pay and/or retirement points from 19 December 2000 to the present. The advisory opinion points out that if the corrected request...