DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR C O R R E C T I O N O F N A V A L RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
W A S H I N G T O N DC 2 0 3 7 0 - 5 1 0 0 TRG
Docket No: 3264-02
8 January 2002
This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code, section 1552.
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 8 January 2003. Your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
your application, together with all material submitted in support
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory
opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, a copy of which
is enclosed.
After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection the Board substantially
concurred with the comments contained in the advisory opinion.
Accordingly, your application has been denied. The names and
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.
It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Exeautive Director
Enclosure
D E P A R T M E N T O F T H @ N A V Y
HEADQUARTERS U N I T E D I T A T L I MARINE CORPS
a280 RUSSELL ROAD
QUANTICO, VIRGINIA ?? 134-6 103
IN REPLY REFER TO:
1741
MMSR-6/5
14 Aug 02
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF
NAVAL RECORDS
Subj: BCNR APPLICATION IN THE CASE OF FORMER SERGEANT
USMCR
Ref:
(a) MMER Route Sheet of 18Ju102, Docket No. 3254-02
(b) MCO 1900R.17
1. Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on Mr.-
petition to correct his record to reflect his eligibility for
early retirement from the Marine Corps Reserve under reference
(b)
2. A review of Mr.
Marine Electronic W-ron
42, Detachment C, on 3 December 1991. This reserve unit was
redesignated as an active duty unit on 2 October 1992.
record shows that he joined
4, Marine Corps Aircraft Group
3 . Mr. -transferred
(IRR) on 14 September 1992. Reference (b) authorized Selected
Reserve Transitional Benefits to reservists who were separated or
transferred to the IRR between 11 March 1993 through 30 September
1999.
to the Individual Ready Reserve
4. Unfortunately, Mr.
retirement under reference (b). We must therefore regretfully
recommend that his petition not be granted favorable
consideration.
does not qualify for early
MMSR-5, -
5. Point of contact is Mr.
Head, Separation and
Retirement Branch
By direction of the Commandant
of the Marine Corps
NAVY | BCNR | CY2003 | 00213-03
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 15 April 2003. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 0213-03 The reference requests an a petition to correct show that he was enrolled in the Reserve Component survivor Benefit Plan (RCSBP) when he died on 3 June 2000. record to 2.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02040-99
The Board, consisting of Mr. Mathews, Mr. Dunn and Ms. McCormick, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 13 July 1999 and, pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. The advisory opinion at enclosure (2) from Headquarters Marine Corps (MMSR-6J) recommends that Petitioner's record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve on 1 January 1999 vice being...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 02265-99
In view of the requirements of the Uniform Retirement Date Act, the Board further concludes that the transfer to the Retired Reserve should be effective on 1 February 1993. The Board further concludes that this Report of Proceedings should be filed in Petitioner's naval record so that all future reviewers will understand his correct status in the Retired Reserve. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve in the grade of GYSGT on...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 05851-01
This would require the transfer of 17 retirement points into the anniversary year with 33 retirement points and continuation for an maximum of four years so he can earn the last six or eight years, whichever is required, in the reserve component. Therefore, given his many years of excellent service and the other circumstances of the case, the Board concludes that the record should be corrected to allow him to earn reserve retirement by completing eight years of qualifying service to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1998 | 08484-98
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. 7 record shows that he served on active duty from * * Reference (a) requests an advisory opinion on- & petition to...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00337-02
considered the advisory opinion furnished by Headquarters Marine Corps, dated 1 February 2002, and a memorandum for the record (MFR) dated 11 March 2002, copies of which are attached. as listed with a d. Reference (c) states "...officers retired voluntarily shall be retired in th satisfactorily held ..." grade of Major effecti issioned officer grade luntarily retired in the e. Due t retirement on 990501, his selection to lieutenant colonel was nullified. Per references (d) and ( would...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 04176.99
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the United States Naval Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show a qualifying year for reserve retirement in the anniversary year ending 17 November 1981. ... We recommend the following: The Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR). direct Headquarters Marine Corps (MMSR-5) to award (Petitioner) the minimum Reserve Retirement points necessary for a...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02198-02
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Petitioner, a former enlisted member of the Marine Corps Reserve filed an application with this Board requesting that his record be corrected to show that he transferred to the Retired Reserve, vice being discharged on 31 December 2001 or any other date. However, the Board is aware that Headquarters Marine Corps has routinely recommended corrective action in similar cases when an individual is qualified for reserve retirement and there is...
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 00799-99
Pursuant to the provisions of referel-, commissioned officer in the United States Marine Corps Reserve filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that eight retirement points be transferred from one anniversary year to another. When the error was corrected, some of the retirement points were shifted to the 1997-98 anniversary year. d. Attached at enclosure (2) is an advisory opinion from Headquarters Marine Corps which also recommends that Petitioner's request to move retirement points...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 00146-02
in the report of the PERB in concluding no correction of your fitness report record was warranted. Removal of the following fitness reports was requested: a. Lieutenant Performance Evaluation Review Board (PERB) denied his request for removal of the Annual fitness reports of 960801 to 970731 and 970801 to 980731. ailed selection on the FY-02 USMC on Board.