Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03274-02
Original file (03274-02.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORD

NAVY 

ANNEX

2 

WASHINGTON DC 20370-510

0

S

TRG
Docket No:
10 September 2002

3274-02

This is in reference to your application for correction of your
naval record pursuant to the provisions of Title 10 of the United
States Code section 1552.

A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 4 September 2002.
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board.
your application,
thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations
and policies.

Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of
together.with  all material submitted in support

Your allegations of error and

After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

You enlisted in the Navy on 30 December 1996 at age 22.
satisfactorily completed initial training and on 3 June 1997 you
reported to the USS ARLIEGH BURRS (DDG 51).
were referred for a competency for duty evaluation because you
smelled of alcohol and the blood alcohol content was found to be
-024.
dependent.
level III alcohol rehabilitation program and were hospitalized
from 11 August to 8 September 1997.

Five days later, you were screened and found to be alcohol

Subsequently, you were referred for an inpatient

On 18 July 1997, you

You

A psychiatric evaluation,
part, as follows:

dated 29 September 1997, states, in

. 

. 

. has long standing insomnia & depressed mood. . . . .

Several UA charges & pending  
Board) for pierced tongue.
. 
had one beer  
cancer. . . . . Command plans to admin sep for Level III
failure 

DRB (Disciplinary Review
Pt ambivalent about USN.

- 8d ago. Recently learned mother has

6 (continuing) disciplinary problems.

Based on the foregoing record you were processed for an
On 3 October 1997 you were issued a
administrative discharge.
general discharge by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure.
At that time, you acknowledged that you were not recommended for
reenlistment and were assigned an RE-4 reenlistment code.

In your application you are requesting recharacterization of your
discharge to honorable, a change in the reason for discharge and
an RE-1 reenlistment code.
level III program and had no aftercare requirements.
state that you told the drug and alcohol program advisor that you
had occasionally consumed wine with dinner and this resulted in
your discharge due to rehabilitation failure.
You believe this
action was improper because you had no alcohol related incidents.

You state that you completed the

You further

In support of your application you have submitted an evaluation
from a mental health professional.
The evaluation states, in
part, as follows:

He told me he rarely drinks, only at a social

I have an acquaintance who knows (him)

level:"'
personally, and I ask (sic) him about his alcohol use.
He voiced to me that he has never seen him intoxicated,
or under the influence of alcohol.

. . . 

. When the crises came up with his ill

I did not find an abuse or dependency related to
What I suspect happened with his discharge

alcohol.
from the Navy previously was that there was present at
that time some 5 years ago, a degree of emotional
immaturity 
relative, mixed with a value of he must do his best, he
became confused, anxious,
withdrawn.
dependency, and was misdiagnosed as alcohol dependent.
. 
situations like this now, in a military environment,
his responses were appropriate.
He also appears to
have made significant resolution with the issues
related to his emotional immaturity.

When I examined his ability to deal with

I think this was confused with alcohol

somewhat depressed and

. . . .

. 

. 

. 

.

. What I see is a man who would make a good

. 

. 
. 
soldier.
his issues at an acceptable level.
for military duty.  

He has no alcohol problems.

-

He deals with
He is well suited

You have also submitted evidence of a good work
discharge.

record since your

The Board found that these contentions were not
warrant recharacterization of your discharge or
reason for your discharge.

The Board noted the evaluation

sufficient to
to change the

2

completed almost five years after your discharge was based solely
on an interview that was conducted when you were not under stress
and when you had an incentive to be on your best behavior.
Therefore, the Board found the evaluation was insufficient to
overcome the diagnoses of alcohol dependence made prior to
referral for alcohol rehabilitation,
When you completed the inpatient
rehabilitation program.
program, you were also required to complete the aftercare
program.
continued to have disciplinary problems and admitted to alcohol
use during aftercare.
The Board concluded that the general
discharge by reason of rehabilitation failure was proper as
issued and no change is warranted.

According to the subsequent psychiatric evaluation, you

and by the experts at the

Regulations require the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code
when an individual is discharged due to alcohol rehabilitation
failure.
discharged for that reason,
injustice in the assignment of the RE-4 reenlistment code.

Since you have been treated no differently than others
the Board could not find an error or

Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon request.

The names and

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be.taken.
You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that a
presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval
record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or injustice.

Sincerely,

W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director

3



Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00542

    Original file (ND02-00542.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    (f)(1).As the representative, we ask that consideration be given to equitable relief, as this is a matter that involves a determination whether a discharge should be changed under the equity standards, to include any issue upon which the Applicant submits to the Board's discretionary authority, under SECNAVIST 5420.174C.Under the premises of equitable relief, we believe the Board can changed the narrative reason to Convenience Of The Government, and the change of the last name to (M_), as...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2003_Navy | ND03-00762

    Original file (ND03-00762.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND03-00762 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review was received on 20030328. On the issue of the change of the RE Code of 4 to that of RE1, we ask that the Board direct the FSM to complete the application DD Form 149 for submittal to the Board For Correction as the Discharge Review Agency does not have jurisdiction on this matter. The summary of service clearly documents her alcohol rehabilitation failure as the reason she was discharged.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 07494-08

    Original file (07494-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. In March 2005 your commanding officer recommended you be processed for an administrative separation by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure as evidenced by your two civil convictions for driving under the influence of alcohol while enrolled ina Level III rehabilitation aftercare...

  • USMC | DRB | 2001_Marine | MD01-00575

    Original file (MD01-00575.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since my discharge I have become a U. The Board found the applicant did not complete required alcohol rehabilitation by reason of his failure to complete the aftercare requirements, which was a documented requirement of his alcohol rehabilitation program. Evidence of continuing educational pursuits, an employment record, documentation of community service, certification of non-involvement with civil authorities and proof of his not using drugs, are examples of verifiable documents that...

  • USMC | DRB | 2005_Marine | MD0501531

    Original file (MD0501531.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    PART I - APPLICANT’S ISSUES AND DOCUMENTATION Issues, as stated Applicant’s issues, as stated on the application to the Board:“The reason for my claim is that my command at the time did not put me into a proper after care program after the completion of my level 3 treatment. PART III – RATIONALE FOR DECISION AND PERTINENT REGULATION/LAW Discussion The Applicant was discharged on 19980130 by reason of alcohol rehabilitation failure (A) with a service characterization of general (under...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2005_Navy | ND0500622

    Original file (ND0500622.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “Affidavit #1I was honorably discharged from the military for alcohol rehabilitation failure without ever having a negative incident during my military time served. I was never afforded the opportunity to speak to my commanding officer, an NJP hearing, JAG representation, or a DAPA representative for the circumstances leading to my forced discharge. Applicant needs to follow-up with DAPA/AA.

  • NAVY | DRB | 2002_Navy | ND02-00160

    Original file (ND02-00160.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ND02-00160 Applicant’s Request The application for discharge review, received 011203, requested that the reason for the discharge be changed to erroneous discharge with a RE-1 or 3 code. In the acknowledgement letter to the applicant, he was informed that the Naval Discharge Review Board (NDRB) first conducts a documentary review prior to any personal appearance hearing and that the NDRB does not have the authority to change a reenlistment code. Applicant did not object to...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 08074-08

    Original file (08074-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 July 2009. Your record reflects that on 9 February you received counselling due to an alcohol related incident on 26 January 1990 and were subsequently assigned to a Level I rehabilitation program on 1 February 1990. The next day you received counselling for alcohol rehabilitation failure.

  • USMC | DRB | 1999_Marine | MD99-00491

    Original file (MD99-00491.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Command inadequate response by denying additional Level III treatment and denying my attendance to aftercare meetings. Also please consider that I had received an honorable discharge from the U.S. Army (1986-1989), and had already received a Honorable discharge from the Marine Corps upon re-enlistment, and was into my third enlistment in military service. 960103: GCMCA [Commanding General, Marine Corps Base, Camp Lejeune] determined that applicant had no potential for further service, that...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004_Navy | ND04-00553

    Original file (ND04-00553.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    “The undesirable discharge is unwarranted due to the fact that the incidents that occurred (DUI), at no time affected or interfered with my duties or my job performance.” Documentation In addition to the service record, the following additional documentation, submitted by the Applicant, was considered:Applicant’s DD Form 214 Statement of Patient’s Treatment Discharge Summary (2 pages) Notice of Completion, Southwest Driver Benefits Program TEMADD Travel Orders, Veteran’s Administration...