DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
2 NAVY ANNEX
WASHINGTON DC 20370-5100
mh
MEH:
Docket No:
9 July 2002
3259-02
Dear
This is in reference to your application
provisions of title 10 of the
Ilnitctl States Code, section
1552.
iOr
correcticm
01‘ your naval record pursuant to the
ot‘ the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive
panel
three-nlember-
A
session, considered your application
were reviewed in accordance with
proceedings of this Board.
application, together
M4th
applicable statutes.
opinion furnished by
attached.
regulatic,ms
NPC
all material
oil 9 July 2002.
Your allegations of error and injustice
regilla1ions and procedures applicable to the
Docunientary material considered by the Board consisted of your
atllllinislrali\~e
submitted in
5upport thereof, your naval record and
antI policies.
1
ll1el11or;1l1(l~lll1
I60
In addition.
Srr
I86
1 8
ii
the Board considered the advisory
of‘
4 June 2002, a copy of which is
After careful and conscientious consideration
evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or
injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments contained in
the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
ttie members of the panel
upon request.
ot‘ the entire record, the Board found that the
been denied. The names and votes of
he furnished
usill
cir&mstances of your case
It is regretted that the
are
You are entitled to have the Board reconsider its decision
evidence or other matter not previously considered by the Board.
to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records. Consequently,
the burden is on the applicant to
when applying for a correction of an official naval record,
demonstrate the existence of probable
wch that favorable action cannot be taken.
iqmn submission of new and material
In this regard, it is important
material error or injustice.
Sincerely,
W. DEAN PFEIFFER
Executive Director
Enclosure
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
NAVY PERSONNEL COMMAND
YILLINDTON TN
38055-0000
INTEDRITY DRIVE
5720
1160
811/I%
Ser
04 Jun 2002
MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN,
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
Via:
PERS-OOZCB
Ref:
SNM's DD Form 149 dtd 28
Dee 01
(a)
(b) NAVADMIN
(c) NAVADMIN
049/01
336/01
Encl:
(1) BCNR File
In response to reference (a),
1.
petitioner's request.
recommend disapproval of the
a.
The petitioner reenlisted on 05 December 2001 for six
years to continue active service.
zone
the petitioner's reenlistment.
"C" SRB entitlement for the
Reference (b) did not list a
ET(14XX) rate/NEC at the time of
b.
Reference
(c) released on 21 December 2001 with an
effective date of 01 January 2002 listed a zone "C" SRB
entitlement for the
ET(14XX) rate/NEC at the 2.0 award level.
C .
The petitioner requests to receive the zone "C" SRB
entitlement.
d.
Navy Personnel Command/OPNAV cannot provide information
pertaining to subsequent SRB
has been released.
counseled concerning reference (c) before the reenlistment.
petitioner's hindsight is not sufficient grounds to change the
reenlistment date or to receive backdated entitlement as no error
or injustice was committed.
NAVADMIN's until after the NAVADMIN
Therefore, the petitioner could not have been
The
In view of the-above,
2.
remain as is.
recommend the petitioner's record
This is an advisory memorandum to reference
3.
by the Board for Correction of Na
Enclosure (1) is returned.
(a) for use
(BCNR) only.
Reenlibtment Incentives Branch
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03083-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive Your allegations of error and injustice session, considered your application on 24 July 2001. were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. opinion furnished by BUPERS memorandum 1160 PERS 815 of 26 June is attached. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use recommend the petitioner's record In view of the above, only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 03281-99
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Sincerely, W. DEAN PFEIFFER Executive Director Enclosure DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BUREAU OF NAVAL PERSONNEL, 5 7 2 0 INTEGRITY DRIVE MILLINGTON TN 38055-0000 IN R E P L Y R E F E R TO 1160 PERS-815 26 Jul 99 MEMORANDUM FOR CHAIRMAN, BOARD FOR CORRECT ON OF NAVAL RECORDS Via: PERS-OOZCB Ref: (a)...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 03241-02
Consequently, on the applicant to when applying for a correction of an official naval record, demonstrate the existence of probable material error or the burden is in.justice. SRB entitlement for the petitioner's reenlistment. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 06314-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 January 2002. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend the petitioner's record This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01519-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 June 2001. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use by the Board for Correction of Naval Records (BCNR) only.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 00896-01
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. petitioner's Executive Officer denied the request for NEC 2735. reference (c) does not indicate if NEC 2735 was e. PERS-815 does not have the authorization to determine the petitioner's eligibility for NEC 2735 upon the release of reference (b).
NAVY | BCNR | CY1999 | 08501-98
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 May 1999. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice. "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 Petitioner's - Reference (c), released 20 Nov 1998 with an effective date Dee 1998 carried the zone "A" SRB entitlement for NEC 3353 of 01 at an...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 08169-00
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 20 March 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. recommend expunging the petitioner's Recommend effecting a This change Subj: BCNR PETITION IC This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2002 | 02469-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 5 February 2002. d. The petitioner requests clarifications of his zone "C" SRB eligibility and obliserve requirements for BUPERS orders 2340. e. Per reference (c), section (M) note 11, service members must successfully complete formal training and be designated in the new skill at reenlistment to be eligible for SRB at the new skill award level. recommend the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 03207-01
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 3 1 July 2001. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. This is an advisory memorandum to reference (a) for use 3. by the Board for Correction of Naval Enclosure (1) is returned.