AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02189
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPPT recommends denial, stating, in part, based on the facts provided, the applicant made an irrevocable RCSBP election for Option B, "Deferred Annuity for Child Only" as prescribed by law U.S.C. In accordance with Title 10, U.S.C., Section 1448 the RCSBP election is irrevocable if not revoked before the end of the 90- day period unless there is a life changing event. As of this date, no response...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02197
Her medical records support her claim she was pregnant at the time of her fitness assessment. After a thorough review of the evidence provided by the applicant, to include the statement from the medical provider, we believe her 21 June 2010 Fitness Assessment score should be removed. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02198
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02198 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 25 Nov 83, the applicant was discharged with service characterized as general (under honorable conditions) in the grade of airman first class. On 2 Jul 84, the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02200
DPSOA states the applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects the correct RE code per AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the United States Air Force, 2 chapter 5, based on his involuntary discharge with a general character of service. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02205
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02205 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry Code (RE) of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment) be changed to 3V (Separated w/Vol Sep Incentive) so he can enlist in the Utah Air National Guard. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02209
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02209 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a direct promotion to the grade of colonel/O-6. After careful review of this application, the most fair and practical remedy is to grant a special selection board by the P0610C Colonel CSB to allow the applicant the opportunity to write a...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02213
The DD Form 4/1 that is in his records was administratively changed after he signed it to reflect 22 months, instead of 22 weeks. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility which is included at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02216
On 15 Mar 12, the applicant was discharged for Misconduct (Serious Offense), and was credited with 9 years, 10 months, and 2 days of total active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the offices of the Air Force office of responsibility which are at Exhibit C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02217
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02217 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His disability rating be changed from 0 to 30 percent and retired by reason of physical disability. The Board also noted the applicant had no rash whatsoever at that time. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02227
DPSIM states that per AFI 36-2905, Air Force Fitness Program, and AFI 10-203, the applicant’s AF Form 422 and AF Form 469 were not in compliance; however, in accordance with a 325 FW/JA Memorandum, dated 3 Aug 2012, the AF Form 469 dated 24 May 2011 and AF Form 422 dated 25 May 2011 underwent an independent Profile Officer Review and all profile officers unanimously agreed that the AF Form 422 dated 25 May 2011 accurately restricted him from the running component of the FA, however he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02228
The IPEB noted that she had declined further “ablation surgery.” On 9 March 2006, the applicant concurred with the findings and recommended disposition of the IPEB. The complete AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ 5 APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 15 Feb 13, by letter, the applicant amended her request and now ask to be medically retired instead of being returned to duty. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02232
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02232 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02234
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02234 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational benefits to his dependents. However, the Air Force did not engage in a Service-wide effort to seek out members who were already on terminal leave, or who had already completed their...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02235
A member who retires under TERA is entitled to recomputation of retired pay if such member is credited with employment under the provisions of 10 U.S.C. The enhanced retirement qualification period is the period between the date of early retirement and the date on which the member would have otherwise completed 20 years of military service for purposes of computing the members retired pay. There is no evidence he was employed by a public service organization between those dates.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02236
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02236 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. Therefore, he never received the Post 9/11 GI Bill separation counseling regarding the requirement to submit the Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB) request before his...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02237
Another evaluator measured him for the third measurement, which was 39.5”. However, we believe the applicant has provided sufficient evidence to raise reasonable doubt as to whether or not the abdominal circumference measurement was accurately recorded during the contested fitness assessment. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02240
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02480 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXX, Arizona (AZ) to XXXXXXX, Massachusetts (MA). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02247
He received an honorable discharge with a narrative reason for separation of “Voluntary Resignation Substandard Performance.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit B. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02254
While his Master Personnel Records did confirm foreign service at Clark Air Base, Philippines for a period of 1 year, 5 months, and 25 days, the total foreign service time as reflected on his DD Form 214 reflects 1 year, 7 months, and 25 days of foreign service; however, since it cannot be proven that he did not serve additional foreign service that cannot be found in the records, no corrective action should be taken. The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02255
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02255 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 5 Jul 57, the applicants commander recommended the applicant undergo an administrative discharge board under the provisions of Air Force Regulation (AFR) 39-17 for a determination of fitness for...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02256
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02256 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her under other than honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 23 January 1992, the commander approved the request for discharge and separated her with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. We took notice of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02263
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02263 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her record be corrected to reflect she elected spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). Furthermore, there is no evidence the applicant submitted an open enrollment election to provide SBP coverage on her spouses behalf...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02268
AFBCMR BC-2012-02268 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02273
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPT recommends denial of the applicants request to meet a continuation board. He would like to continue his career in the Air Force Reserve and is requesting that both of his nonselections be removed from his record. He never received any information or briefing that he would be meeting a promotion board during his time in the IRR.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02275
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIAR recommends denial, noting, in part, there is no evidence of Air Force error or injustice in this case and no basis in law to...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02279
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force which are at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends approval, indicating the applicants service characterization should be corrected to reflect Honorable and the narrative reason for separation be changed to Secretarial Authority. The Department of Defense...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02280
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02280 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her character of service be changed from general to honorable. The Department of Defense (DoD) policy guidance for the repeal of section 654 of Title 10, United States Code addresses the correction of military records and sets forth supplemental policy...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02290
On 10 January 1990, the United States Air Force Court of Military Review affirmed the applicant’s court-martial conviction. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02295
The mandatory DOS and code 67 was in fact in his record at the time of his promotion boards beginning with the CY09B board. Senior raters and all promotion board members are well aware that on a Lt Col promotion board, any officer with a specified DOS has in fact been passed over 2 times or more. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02296
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Article 15 she received on 10 Apr 03 be removed from her records. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFLOA/JAJM recommends...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02297
His DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Mariposa, California as his home of record at the time of his enlistment. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. The applicant’s records reflect Mariposa, California as the state he lived in prior to entering the Air Force.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02298
There was no contact with her commander in any form and she never received any guidance that a promotion to the rank of master sergeant would be non-recommended based on the reasons he provided to her in his non-recommendation letter. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that her non-recommendation for promotion to master sergeant should be removed and her line 3 number reinstated. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02308
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The record he has only specifies time spent in foreign service and he needs a specific record of service in Vietnam to apply for disability and medical benefits. The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 August 2012...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02314
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02314 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02315
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are at Exhibit B, C, D, and E. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/PB recommends denying the applicants request to be considered by an SSB. The applicants LOR was filed in his Officer Selection Record (OSR) on 7 Jul 10 and removed on 30 Jan 12. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02319
The applicant has provided no evidence of error or injustice on the part of the United States Air Force. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) that since the applicant retired prior to the implementation of the Post 9/11 GI Bill education program he is not eligible to transfer education benefits and he has not been the victim of an error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02322
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02322 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her non-selection for promotion to the grade of major by the Calendar Year 2012 (CY12) Nonparticipating Reserve Nurse Corps Major Promotion Selection Board, be removed from her record. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02326
AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, paragraph 10.9.7., states in part, members application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the members lost leave. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 16 July 2012 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02331
DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02331 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct characterization of service be upgraded to general. Specifically, section 1552(f) (1), permits the correction of a record to reflect actions taken by a reviewing authority under the UCMJ. Rules for Courts-Martial 1003(b), (8), (C), state...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02339
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02339 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02353
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02353 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reentry (RE) code of 2C (Approved Honorable Involuntary Separation or Entry Level Separation) be changed to an RE code 1. In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement and letters of recommendation. The complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02355
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02355 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. If the Board finds there was an injustice to the extent that the member did not receive adequate pre-separation counseling, as required by law and DoD regulation, and was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02356
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02356 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records reflect his foreign service at Kadena Air Base (AB) Okinawa. The Board notes that the Air Force office of primary responsibility states the information provided failed to support the applicants claim of Foreign Service at Kadena AB,...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02358
AFBCMR BC-2012-02358 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, we recommend the former members records be corrected to show that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02364
The applicant’s last five FA scores are as follows: DATE 10 Feb 10 31 Aug 10 * 14 Sep 11 27 Oct 11 2 Feb 12 *Contested FA score. _________________________________________________________________ , Panel Chair , Member , Member THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the cardio and sit-up components of the Fitness Assessment dated 14 Sep 11 be amended to reflect “exempt” in the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02373
The program was not in effect at the time of the applicants retirement on 31 July 2002. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 11 February 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02373 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 April 2012, w/atch. Exhibit C....
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02383-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02383 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. In addition, the applicant has provided a letter from the Department of Veterans Affairs indicating their...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02385
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02385 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation, separation program designator (SPD) and reentry (RE) code be changed to allow her to reenter military service. On 15 Jun 07, the applicant was furnished an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service and a...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02387
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2012-02387 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _____________________ _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 5 October 2011, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02388
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There was a discrepancy between restrictions placed on his AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 19 Apr 2012 and the testing exemptions reflected on the AF Form 422, Notification of Air Force Member’s Qualification Status, dated 20 Apr 2012. On 23 Apr 2012, he took his copy of the AF Form 422 to his scheduled FA. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...