Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02319
Original file (BC-2012-02319.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02319 

 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His option to transfer unused Post 9/11 GI Bill education 
benefits to his spouse and children be approved. 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was not afforded the opportunity to transfer his benefits to 
his dependents due to the fact that he retired before the Post 
9/11 GI Bill education benefits transfer came into effect on 
1 August 2009. If he had been given the option to transfer 
benefits there is no doubt that he would have done so and 
completed any necessary military obligation. He currently has 
two dependents attending college and having the ability to 
transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill education benefits would greatly 
assist in their educational needs. 

 

There has been a lot of confusion regarding whether a retiree 
could transfer their benefits to their dependents and also the 
proper procedure used to transfer benefits. With clearer 
guidance he believes more retirees will apply to transfer their 
benefits to their dependents. 

 

The applicant did not provide any documents in support of his 
request. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

According to documents extracted from the Automated Records 
Management System (ARMS), the applicant is a former member of 
the Regular Air Force who served from 22 March 1982 to 
31 July 2007. He was trained and served as an Munitions Systems 
Superintendent and was progressively promoted to the rank of 
Senior Master Sergeant (SMSgt), with a pay grade of E-8, 
effective 1 April 2004. He was retired from active duty with an 
honorable characterization of service and credited with serving 
25 years, 4 months and 10 days of active duty service. 

 


 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states the program was not 
in effect at the time of the applicant’s retirement on 31 July 
2007. The applicant has provided no evidence of error or 
injustice on the part of the United States Air Force. 

 

The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 25 June 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D). To date, this office has not received a response. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough 
review of the evidence of record and the applicant's submission, 
we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force 
office of primary responsibility (OPR) that since the applicant 
retired prior to the implementation of the Post 9/11 GI Bill 
education program he is not eligible to transfer education 
benefits and he has not been the victim of an error or injustice. 
In view of the above, we find no basis to recommend granting the 
relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2012-02319 in Executive Session on 11 February 2013, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 May 2012. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Record 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 12 June 2012. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 June 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04835

    Original file (BC 2013 04835.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Post-9/11 GI Bill Transferability: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) who meets Post- 9/11 GI Bill eligibility requirements and at the time of the approval of the member’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance: Has at least six years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election and agrees to serve four additional years in the Air Force from the date of request, regardless of the number of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02373

    Original file (BC-2012-02373.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The program was not in effect at the time of the applicant’s retirement on 31 July 2002. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 11 February 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2012-02373 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 April 2012, w/atch. Exhibit C....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01985

    Original file (BC-2012-01985.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not counseled on the requirements to transfer at least one month of education benefits to each dependent prior to his retirement. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02661

    Original file (BC-2012-02661.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02661 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits to his dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01574

    Original file (BC-2012-01574.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Post-9/11 GI Bill: Any member of the Armed Forces (active duty or Selected Reserve (SelRes), officer or enlisted) on or after 1 Aug 09, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, and: • Has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve a specified additional period in the Armed Forces from the date of election. The Air Force provided unfair and misleading information concerning Post 9-11 transferability by stating that enrolled members were...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05696

    Original file (BC 2012 05696.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05696 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. DPSIT states that the applicant retired effective 31 Jul 2009. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04210

    Original file (BC-2011-04210.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04210 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. In support of his request, the applicant provides a Military Times article, titled “Some Army, Air Force retirees can still get GI Bill transfers.” The applicant's complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01350

    Original file (BC-2012-01350.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After retiring from the Air Force he became aware that he was required to transfer his education benefits to his dependents prior to his retirement. He was not briefed that he had to transfer benefits before retiring. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC- 2012-01350 in Executive Session on 13 Nov 2012, under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02528

    Original file (BC-2012-02528.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    If he were informed, he would have extended his service to allow the transfer of Post 9/11 education benefits to his dependents. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial. DPSIT states the applicant was not on active duty on or after 1 Aug 2009, therefore, he is not eligible to transfer benefits to his dependents.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01922

    Original file (BC-2012-01922.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The option to elect TEB for his dependents was available on the DVA website when he switched from the Montgomery GI Bill to the Post-9/11 GI Bill educational benefits. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered...