Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02240
Original file (BC-2012-02240.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02480 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His Home of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXX, Arizona (AZ) 
to XXXXXXX, Massachusetts (MA). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

His family has relocated since he entered the Air Force and his 
family and home are now in XXXXXXX, MA. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular 
Air Force on 17 Mar 2005. His DD Form 4, Enlistment - 
Reenlistment Document, reflects XXXXXXX, AZ as his HOR. 

 

Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) Volume I, Appendix A, 
states in part that a HOR is the place recorded as the 
individual’s home when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, 
inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty. Any correction 
must be fully justified and the home, as corrected, must be the 
member’s actual home upon entering the Service, and not a 
different place selected for the member's convenience. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. DPSIPE states the applicant’s 
records reflect XXXXXXX, AZ as the city/state in which he lived 
prior to entering the Air Force. In addition, XXXXXXX, AZ has 
been consistently listed throughout his military records. There 
is no error or justification that warrants a change to his HOR. 

 

The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 26 Jul 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application 
in Executive Session on 7 Mar 2013, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 


The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2012-02480: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Jun 2012, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 22 Jun 2012, w/atch. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 Jul 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01906

    Original file (BC-2012-01906.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS HEARING DESIRED: NO DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01906 COUNSEL: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to 2330 Buckboard Trail, Cottonwood, AZ 86326. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service records, are contained in the evaluation by the Air Force office of primary responsibility...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03414

    Original file (BC-2012-03414.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    His DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Middleton, MA as his home of record at the time of his enlistment. The applicant’s records reflect Middleton, MA as the home of record where he resided prior to entering the Air Force. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02520

    Original file (BC 2012 02520.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, Southaven, MS is consistently listed throughout his records as his HOR. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02975

    Original file (BC 2014 02975.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of the applicant’s military personnel records failed to substantiate an error or injustice to warrant changing his HOR. The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy Of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 Dec 14, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03581

    Original file (BC 2013 03581.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to item 7(b) of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, his home of record at time of entry reflects “Glendale (Maricopa), AZ.” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial, indicating there is no...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03485

    Original file (BC 2014 03485.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03485 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Sun City, Arizona (AZ) to Lake Arrowhead, California (CA). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03524

    Original file (BC 2011 03524.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant's initial DD Form 4 reflects Mentor, Minnesota as the city/state in which he lived prior to entering the Air Force and has been consistently listed throughout his military records as his HOR. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01600

    Original file (BC-2012-01600.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01600 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from XXXXXXX, Virginia to XXXXXXX, Texas. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 03114

    Original file (BC 2012 03114.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 Aug 2012, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00605

    Original file (BC-2012-00605.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-00605 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from North Dakota to Germany. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit...