Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02234
Original file (BC-2012-02234.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02234 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Educational 
benefits to his dependents. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He was not informed by the retention office manager (ROM) that 
he had to transfer the benefit over to his wife before he 
retired. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant retired in the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt, E-5) 
effective 26 Sep 2011. 

 

38 U.S.C. § 3323(b)(1) and (2) require the Secretary to provide 
members with information on the Post-9/11 GI Bill as specified 
in DoD regulations. DTM 09-003, dated 22 Jun 2009, required the 
Military Departments to provide and document individual 
preseparation or release from active duty counseling on Post-
9/11 GI Bill benefits. 

 

The Air Force issued AFI 36-2306 AFGM 1 on 23 Jul 2009. The 
AFGM 1, paragraph (4)(c)(15)(d)) requires pre-separation 
counseling, documented on DD Form 2648, Preseparation Counseling 
Checklist for Active Component (AC), Active Guard Reserve (AGR), 
Active Reserve (AR), Full Time Support (FTS), and Reserve 
Program Administrator (RPA) Service Members. However, the Air 
Force did not engage in a Service-wide effort to seek out 
members who were already on terminal leave, or who had already 
completed their pre-separation counseling, in order to provide 
them with additional counseling on the Post-9/11 GI Bill. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

NGB/A1YR recommends approval. A1YR states they contacted the ROM 
at the applicant’s former Wing to obtain additional information. 
The ROM stated he could not find any documentation which 
indicated the applicant received a Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer of 
Educational benefits briefing prior to his retirement. 

 

The complete A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

NGB/A1PS concurs with A1YR’s advisory and recommends approval. 

 

The complete A1PS evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

On 30 Aug 2012, copies of the Air Force evaluations were 
forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 
30 days. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit D). 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was timely filed. 

 

3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. While we note 
the steps the Air Force took to inform eligible personnel of 
this new benefit, it appears that through no fault of the 
applicant he was not timely made aware of his eligibility and 
the steps necessary to transfer his benefits to his dependents. 
Therefore, in the interest of justice, we find the evidence 
sufficient to grant the requested relief and recommend his 
records be corrected as indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 25 Sep 
2011, he elected to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill Educational 
Benefits to his dependents. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 


The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-
2012-02234 in Executive Session on 12 Mar 2013, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

, Panel Chair 

, Member 

, Member 

 

All members voted to correct the record as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2012-
02234: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 May 2012. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1YR, dated 13 Jul 2012. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, NGB/A1PS, dated 16 Jul 2012. 

 Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Aug 2012. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02744

    Original file (BC-2012-02744.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military personnel records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air National Guard at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1YR recommends approval if the Board finds there is an injustice. The complete NGB/A1YR evaluation is at Exhibit C. NGB/A1PS states they concur with the NGB/A1YR advisory. In this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01533

    Original file (BC-2012-01533.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01533 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00707

    Original file (BC-2012-00707.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 7 Nov 2011 the DVA sent a letter that restored his education benefits. The complete A1YR evaluation is at Exhibit C. NGB/A1PS concurs with A1YR and recommends approval of the applicant’s request to change his eligibility to transfer his Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. 3 ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01773

    Original file (BC-2012-01773.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01773 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the National Guard Bureau, which is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01611

    Original file (BC-2012-01611.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01611 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependents. Any member of the Armed Forces on or after August 1, 2009, who, at the time of approval of the individual’s request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01300

    Original file (BC-2012-01300.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. For the first time in history, service members enrolled in thePost-9/11 GI Bill Program are able to transfer unused educational benefits to their dependent spouses or children. While we note the comments of NGB/A1PSindicating the applicant’s squadron did not receive the Post9/11 GI Bill Informational Briefing until after the applicanthad retired, we also note the applicant never out-processedthrough the Retention Office Manager (ROM),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00413

    Original file (BC-2012-00413.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which are attached at Exhibits B and C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1YR recommends approval. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-01984

    Original file (BC-2012-01984.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01984 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill benefits to his dependent. He submitted his retirement request upon his return from deployment with an effective date of 1 July 2010. ________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01106

    Original file (BC-2012-01106.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any member of the Armed Forces who, on or after 1 August 2009, who is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill, had at least 6 years of service on the date of election may transfer unused Post-9/11 benefits to their dependents. During that time frame, many members did not receive separation counseling on the TEB requirements and missed the opportunity to submit their TEB request prior to retiring from the Air National Guard. ________________________________________________________________ THE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01685

    Original file (BC-2012-01685.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 2 the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Record Exhibit C. Letter,...