RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02213
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His date of separation (DOS) be changed from 3 Sep 15 to
7 April 14.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces
of the United States, which he initialed, signed, and dated
contained a miscalculation resulting in an incorrect DOS. The
DD Form 4/1 clearly states he reenlisted for 4 years and
22 weeks, of which 22 weeks is considered an Active Duty
Obligation. The DD Form 4/1 that is in his records was
administratively changed after he signed it to reflect
22 months, instead of 22 weeks.
The applicants complete submission, with attachment, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are described
in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary
responsibility which is included at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of
an injustice. The applicant wants his Term of Enlistment (ToE)
for his current reenlistment to be considered to be 4 years and
22 weeks versus 4 years and 22 months. The applicant reenlisted
in the RegAF on 9 Nov 09 for a period of 4 years and 22 months
which established his new DOS as 3 Sep 15. At the time of his
reenlistment, he had 22 months of obligated service remaining
until his 5 Dec 11 DOS from his initial enlistment. However, on
his DD Form 4/1 the word weeks was not properly lined out and
replaced with the word months as Air Force guidance requires.
In accordance with AF guidance, years and months are the
only authorized enlistment/reenlistment terms. The Air Force
does not allow enlistments in weeks. The applicants correct
DOS of 3 Sep 15 has been in the personnel system and on his
leave and earnings statement for three years. Any other
notifications and/or RIPs he received during those three years
would have also reflected a 3 Sep 15 DOS. Moreover, the
applicant currently has an assignment for which he does not need
retainability. However, if the AFBCMR approves his request, he
will then need retainability for his current assignment and,
therefore, be able to reenlist and earn a Selective Reenlistment
Bonus (SRB) entitlement for up to 16 months, a period of time he
is already obligated to serve based on his first and current
enlistment.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 22 Aug 12 for review and comment within 30 days.
As of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an injustice. We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has
not been the victim of an injustice. Therefore, in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2012-02213 in Executive Session on 29 Jan 13, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 Apr 12, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 16 Jul 12.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Aug 12.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03119
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03119 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Term of Enlistment (TOE) for his 26 September 2008 reenlistment be considered as five years and nine weeks rather than five years and nine months. Per Air Force guidance, years and months is the only authorized terms of enlistment/reenlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04229
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. Furthermore, we note the the Air Force office of responsibility recommends denying the applicants request based on the Air Force reenlistment process of contracting in whole year increments rather than in weeks; however,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02401
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicants request to have his reenlistment updated as 4 years and 14 [sic] weeks. The applicants Zone B (10 to 14 years of service) Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) window ends 5 Sep 2015 which is before his current DOS of 29 Feb 2016. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03826
On 19 Jan 10, the applicant was counseled by Military Personnel Flight (MPF) via the AF IMT 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve on his extension request and his available options. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterates his argument that he was miscounseled when told he...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03514
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03514 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 11-month Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) he incurred for attending the Joint Terminal Attack Controller Course (JTACAIC) be cancelled. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The JTACAIC...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04548
According to the applicants AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extensions of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force (REGAF)/AIR Force Reserve (AF Reserve)/Air National Guard (ANG), dated 25 Jun 13, the applicant requested cancellation of her 26 months extension for the purpose of immediate reenlistment in order to receive a Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB). THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03105
Then she found out she had been miscounseled and had actually been eligible to reenlist in Jun 11. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends partially granting, indicating there is evidence of an error or injustice. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03193
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS His current reenlistment date of 29 Jul 08 be changed to a later date so that he may be paid a selective reenlistment bonus (SRB). The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-03193 in Executive Session on 13 Apr 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03513
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03513 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 1411, Extension Or Cancellation Of Extensions Of Enlistment In The Regular Air Force (REGAF)/Air Force Reserve (AF Reserve)/Air National Guard (ANG), dated 9 Nov 11, be corrected to reflect he extended his enlistment 36 months instead of 30...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04666
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04666 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 3 year and 25 month reenlistment be changed to a 5 year reenlistment and his entitlement to a Zone B, Multiple 7.0, Selective Reenlistment Bonus (SRB) for three years, be changed to 5 years. The applicant was not eligible to cancel his...