AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02720
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02720 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to transfer his Post-9/11 GI Bill Transfer Eligibility Benefits (TEB) to his dependent son. He did not enroll his son as a dependent because he was an active duty Air Force member at the time. We took notice of the applicant's complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02724
On 08 February 2005, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to discharge him for defective enlistment: fraudulent entry into military service. His service was uncharacterized and his narrative reason for separation was listed as Fraudulent Entry into Military Service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application extracted from the applicants military personnel records are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02725
AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airman, paragraph 2.8, indicates that airmen should not be retained beyond their ETS involuntarily for completion of involuntary discharge processing. While the applicant takes issue with this opinion on rebuttal, we do not find his assertions or the documentation provided sufficient to conclude that corrective action is warranted. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02726
On 9 Jan 09, the applicants commander notified her that he was recommending her discharge from the Air Force for a condition that interfered with military service (mental disorders). A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial noting the applicant has not provided any evidence to support a change her RE code. The complete copy of AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02727
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02727 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) Code of 2C, Separation Program Designator (SPD) Code of JGA, and Narrative Reason for Separation (Entry Level Performance or Conduct) on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed so he can apply...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02731
AFBCMR BC-2011-02731 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02732
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02732 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary (GWOT-E) Medal. For eligibility of the GWOT-E, individuals must have deployed abroad, on or after 11 September...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02740
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02740 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Block 24 of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect: 1. The applicant's entitlement to the Vietnam Service Medal with three Bronze Service Stars and the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02745
Before joining the Air Force Reserve, he was selected for promotion to major by the Calendar Year 2006B (CY06B) Active Duty board in Sep 06. AFI 36-2504, Officer Promotion, Continuation, and Early Removal in the Reserve of the Air Force, paragraph 6.4, states that any officer selected for promotion to a higher grade, who transfers from the ADL to the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) of the same armed force, will receive their promotion providing the officer remains in the same competitive...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02746
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02746 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be credited with one (1) additional point for the Retirement Year Ending (RYE) 18 May 03. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PS recommends denial stating, in part, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02748
Additionally, notes from a VA examination reveal the actual combat that he had was not important because most of his time was spent waiting and training and fighting the various tropical illnesses. In accordance with Army Regulation (AR) 600-45, Decorations, dated 22 September 1943, during the period in question, the PH was awarded for wounds received in action against an enemy of the United States, or as a direct result of an act of such enemy, provided such wound necessitated treatment...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02755
The U.S. Court of Claims has consistently ruled that widows of members retiring after SBP's implementation, who were not given notice of the sponsor's election, are entitled to full SBP coverage-Barber v. U.S., 676 F.2d 651 (CI. In this case, although this applicant claims she does not remember seeing the notification letter when the decedent declined SBP coverage prior to his retirement, clearly the spouse notification letter was sent to her by the Air Force as required by law. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02759
AFBCMR BC-2011-02759 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02760
The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice to warrant the requested change to his discharge characterization. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02762
A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of reserve service. If he can provide documentation showing he attempted to change his daughter's status in DEERs prior to retiring and the Board finds there was injustice, NGB/RS recommends approval of his eligibility to transfer his Post 9/11 GJ Bill education benefits to his dependent. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02765
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02765 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive compensation for his personally procured move (PPM) from Hawaii to Texas that he was quoted using rates calculated under the Transportation Operational Personal Property Standard (TOPS) system rather than those authorized by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02768
After being successful in reenlisting in the United States Air Force Reserve (USAFR), he subsequently transferred back to his former unit with sufficient retainability for promotion; however, he was still not recommended for promotion. 2) His unit commander took him back on the basis that he would deploy and not be at the unit. However, since he was a member of the Air Force Reserve, the squadron commander of the unit he was assigned to (not the TDY commander) could have recommended him...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02769
________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial, stating, in part, based on the facts provided, the applicant did not request to change his RCSBP coverage within one year of the divorce as required by law, Title 10, USC, Section 1448. However, they have no record of the applicant contacting them. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02770
AFBCMR BC-2011-02770 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02773
AFBCMR BC-2011-02773 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02774
AFBCMR BC-2011-02774 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02775
In this case, when the CY11 board considered the applicant, he did not have the required OPR in his records. In view of this and noting the fact that a required, HAF-directed OPR was not a matter of record when his record was considered for promotion by the CY11 major board, we find the applicant was denied fair and equitable promotion consideration to the grade of major based on an incomplete record. In view of this, and noting the applicant did not have a sufficient record of performance...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02782
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02782 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02783
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02783 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His WD AGO Form 53, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, Honorable Discharge, be corrected to reflect he was discharged from the Air Force versus the Army in the rank of staff sergeant (SSG) rather than sergeant (Sgt). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02790
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02790 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. c. On 8 December 1982, the applicant failed to report to his place of duty at the prescribed time and was derelict in the performance of his duty. The applicant was...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02795
Board members were advised that officers within 5 years of retirement eligibility as of the board convening date of 7 Mar 11 and those officers with critical skills should normally be considered. Furthermore, his situation is no more unique than the other 150 plus officers who were not continued and must separate from the Air Force. For example, in Oct 04, the SECAF approved a continuation policy of continuing all twice-deferred majors with more than 14 years of total active federal...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02802
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02802 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 19 Apr 72, the Acting Staff Judge Advocate found the case file legally sufficient to support separation with a general discharge. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 14 Oct 11.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02804
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, does not reflect the KDSM or the AFEM. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial, stating, in part, the documentation in the applicants personnel file reflects TDY service in Korea; however, the Directorate of Personnel Assignments (DPA) office...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02804 ADDENDUM
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit F (with Exhibits A through E). The airman stated that he remembered the applicant deploying to Osan AB, Korea a few days after Christmas in 1968 and returned in Feb 1969. The Board carefully considered the statement provided by the applicants neighbor at the time; however, the Board did not find the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02809
AFBCMR BC-2011-02809 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, the applicant's records should be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff or his designee....
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02810
The applicant failed the Muscular Fitness portion of the test therefore his overall FA rating was Unsatisfactory. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. Accordingly there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02816
If, however, the member's HOR is outside the commuting distance, the member is entitled to per diem and other additional financial benefits. His alleged former girlfriend testified that she did not date the applicant and he never lived at her residence. The complete AF/JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He notes that it appears the government, in its advisory opinion addresses...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02821
The applicant received an uncharacterized entry-level separation on 12 Oct 01, by reason of Personality Disorder, and was issued an RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service). The complete AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of his request to change his character of service and narrative reason for separation, stating, in part, based on the documentation on file in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02825
We took notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we do not find the documentation presented sufficient to conclude the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02827
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02827 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. In May 1977 the applicant received an Article 15 for possession of marijuana on base, with punishment consisting of a suspended reduction to the grade of Airman First Class, E-3,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02832
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02832 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Furthermore, we do not find clemency is appropriate in this case since the applicant has not provided any evidence concerning his post- service activities. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02834
He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). The applicant requests Block 11 of his DD Form 214 be changed to reflect T42399, Master Instructor and Aircraft Electrical Superintendent. The complete DPSIDC evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reiterated the errors on his DD Form 214.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02842
In the absence of any information from the applicant documenting his activities since leaving the service, we are not inclined to favorably consider his request for an honorable discharge. As to the applicants request to be reinstated to the rank of Sergeant, he has provided no evidence indicating his rank was incorrect at the time of his discharge. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02843
AFBCMR BC-2011-02843 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: XXXXXXX Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02845
DPSIT states that members have had the impression that being on active duty or in the Selected Reserve (SELRES) on the effective date of the law, 1 August 2009, was sufficient to vest them with the right to transfer benefits at some time in the future. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-02845 in Executive Session on 21 May 2012, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: By a majority vote,...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02847
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02847 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Addressing the applicants character of service, as depicted on both her DD Form 214 and NGB Form 22, the Medical Consultant notes this has been entered as entry level. The Medical Consultant opines the appropriate designation would be...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02863
According to the applicants military personnel records, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 26 Feb 01. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02866
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was given an assignment to serve as a T-6 Instructor Pilot at Sheppard Air Force Base (AFB), Texas, in April 2010. Upon receiving this assignment he was given an Air Force Personnel Center brief through the Osan Air Base Force Support Squadron (FSS) and Military Personnel Flight (MPF) outbound assignments division. He reported to Sheppard AFB in June 2010 and completed T-6 Pilot Instructor...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02867
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSDD recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The DVA awards service connection for claimed disability but does not make a determination as to whether conditions are combat...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02871
However, with respect to the applicants eligibility for military disability compensation, even under a presumption that his medical condition was service incurred or aggravated, the photographs alone are insufficient to determine that he should have been placed on Medical Hold for the purpose of conducting a Medical Evaluation Board in 1983; or that he would have been found unfit for continued service by a Physical Evaluation Board, were he not already separating under provision of ANGR...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02872
On 28 Sep 88, the applicants commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for misconduct (sexual deviation). Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-02872 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02873
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02873 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). However, according to the applicants DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, he was furnished an...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02874
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AETC/DPSOE states they are unable to provide test results/score notice for cycle 02E7 as the applicant was never considered for promotion because he did not take the required Specialty Knowledge Test...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02875
On 16 Sep 82, the applicant was notified by the Director, Personnel/Administrative Services, that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for misconduct (specifically for drug abuse). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02882
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02882 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record at time of entry, Block 7a, on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from Brooklyn, New York to Wichita Falls, Texas. ...