Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03023
Original file (BC-2011-03023.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
 

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03023 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

The Enlisted Medical Badge be added to his DD Form 214, Armed 
Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

He realizes the badge did not exist at the time he served, but 
was wondering if it could be added to his records. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides DD Form 214. 

 

His complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 25 Jun 62 
and was progressively promoted to the grade of airman first class 
(E-4). He was honorably discharged after serving 4 years on 
active duty. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

AFPC/DPSIMC recommends denial. DPSIMC states the Enlisted 
Medical Badge was not approved until 1987; therefore, the 
applicant is not eligible for the badge. 

 

The DPSIMC complete evaluation is at Exhibit B. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 

 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 


 

The applicant responded by stating that he has since learned that 
the Prisoner of War (POW) medal was authorized the same year as 
the Enlisted Medical Badge and yet POWs as far back as World War 
II are authorized to wear it; he feels it is unfair and a double 
standard. 

 

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit D. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice. While we note the 
applicant’s view that not awarding him the enlisted medical badge 
retroactively as has been done with the POW medal constitutes a 
double standard, we would point out the determination of 
eligibility criteria for awards and decorations is not within the 
purview of the Board. Additionally, the applicant has not shown 
that he has been treated any differently than others similarly 
situated regarding award of the enlisted medical badge. 
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03023 in Executive Session on 29 Nov 11 and 19 Jan 
12, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: 


 

 , Panel Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence for Docket Number BC-2011-03023 
was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Aug 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIMC, dated 2 Sep 11. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Sep 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 Jan 12. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 

 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02714

    Original file (BC-2012-02714.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02714 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect all awards and decorations he earned. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-02267

    Original file (BC-2010-02267.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02267 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he was awarded the Iraq Campaign Medal with four Bronze Service Stars (ICM w/4 BSS) rather than the ICM with two Bronze Service Stars (ICM w/2 BSS); and to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01670

    Original file (BC-2011-01670.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant received frostbite injuries in January 1945 while a POW; however, frostbite is not normally an injury which qualifies a member for entitlement to the PH. In this respect, we note Army Regulation 600-45, provides that the PH Medal may be awarded to members who are wounded in action against an enemy of the United States, and defined a wound as an injury to any part of the body from an outside force, element, or agent sustained as a result of a hostile act of the enemy. Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00797

    Original file (BC-2010-00797.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was awarded the Combat Action Badge by the Department of the Army, by Special Order, dated 7 Feb 07. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02863

    Original file (BC-2011-02863.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to the applicant’s military personnel records, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 26 Feb 01. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-01833

    Original file (BC-2010-01833.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy actions (e.g., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced aircraft bailout injuries, etc.). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPWC recommends denial for the award of the POW Medal. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPWC, dated 16 Nov 10.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02847

    Original file (BC-2009-02847.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant submits a letter from the Veterans Service Office, a personal statement, and a copy of his DD Form 214. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIMC recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the Sharpshooter Badge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01539

    Original file (BC-2013-01539.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While the deceased member was a POW from 31 Jan 45 to 29 Apr 45, the applicant did not submit documentation which verifies the deceased...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02213

    Original file (BC-2010-02213.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02213 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. In contrast, “interned” is defined as “the casualty is definitely known to have been taken into custody of a non belligerent foreign power as a result of and for reasons arising out of any armed conflict in which the Armed Forces of the United...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-00154

    Original file (BC-2008-00154.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSIMC recommends denial of his request to change his DD Form 214 to indicate a date of separation of 10 Sep 90 and indicates the finance system cannot confirm he took terminal leave prior to his separation from the Air Force. He did not submit documentation to substantiate an error in his separation date. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.