Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03068
Original file (BC-2011-03068.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03068 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be 
upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

The terms of his separation included a provision to upgrade his 
discharge to general (under honorable conditions) so long as he 
did not have any criminal activity for six months following his 
discharge. He has met the conditions. 

 

No supporting documentation was submitted. 

 

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The National Personnel Records Center (NPRS) was unable to obtain 
the applicant’s discharge case file. The following information 
was extracted from his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or 
Discharge from Active Duty. On 7 Oct 87, the applicant enlisted 
in the Regular Air Force. On 15 Sep 93, he was separated from 
military service and issued an under other than honorable 
conditions (UOTHC) discharge. His narrative reason for 
separation states “Request for discharge in lieu of trial by 
court-martial.” He served 5 years, 11 months and 8 days on 
active duty. 

 

Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of 
Investigation indicated that on the basis of the data furnished, 
they were unable to locate an arrest record (Exhibit C). 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The application was not filed within three years after the 
alleged error or injustice was discovered, or reasonably could 
have been discovered, as required by Section 1552, Title 10, 
United States Code (10 USC 1552), and Air Force Instruction 36-
2603. Thus the application is untimely. 

 

2. Paragraph b of 10 USC 1552 permits us, in our discretion, to 
excuse untimely filing in the interest of justice. We have 
carefully reviewed applicant's submission and the entire record, 
and we do not find a sufficient basis to excuse the untimely 
filing of this application. The applicant has not shown a 
plausible reason for delay in filing, and we are not persuaded 
that the record raises issues of error or injustice which require 
resolution on the merits at this time. Accordingly, we conclude 
that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the 
untimely filing of the application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

DECISION OF THE BOARD: 

 

The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the 
interest of justice to waive the untimeliness. It is the 
decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as 
untimely. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 29 Mar 12, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603: 

 

 , Panel Chair 

, Member 

 , Member 

 

The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-
2011-03068: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 26 Jul 11. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Panel Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01601

    Original file (BC 2014 01601.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01601 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service.) be corrected to an eligible reentry code for reenlistment. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00108

    Original file (BC-2011-00108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By letter dated 25 May 11, HQ AFPC/DPSOAA states there is no evidence to support the applicant’s deceased grandfather enlisted rather than being inducted under the selective service system which was highly active during WWII. His date of induction is recorded in block 22 as 16 Feb 42, matching his date of entry on active duty recorded in block 24. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03619

    Original file (BC-2011-03619.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPWC states in part, the applicant’s was not identified as one of the sixty-six hostages that were held captive on 4 Nov 79 when Iranian militants stormed the US Embassy in Tehran. The applicant’s response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. Exhibit B.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00901

    Original file (BC-2009-00901.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPSOE response was negative and they state that being awarded the PH may not have made a difference to his promotion in the 75B7 promotion cycle. The applicant has not shown a plausible reason for delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that the record raises issues of error or injustice that require resolution on its merits. Accordingly, we conclude that it would not be in the interest of justice to excuse the untimely filing of the application regarding his request for promotion to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02632

    Original file (BC-2006-02632.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 4 June 1985. Between 4 June 1989 and 3 June 1992 his record indicates service with a Reserve component where he accumulated three satisfactory years of service towards a Reserve retirement – part of which the record shows was spent in the CAANG. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04613

    Original file (BC-2011-04613.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04613 (DECEASED) COUNSEL: NONE (APPLICANT) HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her father be posthumously promoted to the grade of captain (O-3). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is attached at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02077

    Original file (BC-2011-02077.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was not selected for Regular Air Force (RegAF) by the Fiscal Year 66 (FY66), FY68 and FY70 Regular Air Force Selection Boards. DPSOO opines a direct promotion would be unfair to other officers who were not selected for Regular Air Force and required to retire at the 20 year point without being able to meet a lieutenant colonel promotion board. Accordingly, we conclude that it would not be in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01403

    Original file (BC 2014 01403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01403 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be updated to reflect service in both Spain and Vietnam. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01495

    Original file (BC 2014 01495.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 Jul 89, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied a similar request. We have carefully reviewed applicant's submission and the entire record, and we do not find a sufficient basis to excuse the untimely filing of this application. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Apr 14.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03181

    Original file (BC-2010-03181.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the facts pertaining to this application are taken from the documents provided by the applicant and those facts contained in the evaluation prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will...