Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03020
Original file (BC-2011-03020.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03020 

 

 (DECEASED) COUNSEL: NONE 

 

 (APPLICANT) HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

Her late grandfather’s records be corrected to reflect award of 
the following awards and decorations: 

 

1. Good Conduct Medal (GCM). 

 

2. American Campaign Medal (ACM). 

 

3. Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal (APCM). 

 

4. World War II Victory Medal (WWIIVM) (administratively 
resolved). 

 

5. Army of Occupation Medal-Japan (AOM-Japan) (administratively 
resolved). 

 

6. World War II Lapel Button. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Her grandfather’s records should be amended to reflect all the 
awards he and his unit were eligible for. 

 

In support of her appeal, applicant provides an expanded 
statement and copies of her grandfather’s WD AGO Forms 53-55, Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, the Lineage and Honors 
History of the 2d Operations Support Squadron, and letters from 
the National Personnel Records Center and the Army Review Boards 
Agency. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The service member’s military records were destroyed by the fire 
at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 1973. 

 


The service member’s WD AGO 53–55 reflects that he served on 
active duty from 22 Jan 46 to 17 Jun 47. His report of 
separation further reflects that he departed for Japan on 
6 Aug 46 and returned to the Continental United States (CONUS) on 
6 May 47. 

 

The GCM is awarded to Air Force enlisted personnel who have 
honorably completed three continuous years of active service 
prior to 26 Aug 40, and who are recommended by their commanding 
officers for exemplary behavior, efficiency and fidelity 
throughout the qualifying period, including time spent in 
attendance at service schools, and there must have been no 
conviction by court martial. 

 

The ACM is awarded to service members who served outside the 
CONUS in the American Theater for at least 30 days between 
7 Dec 41 and 2 Mar 46, or who served during that period for an 
aggregate period of one year in the CONUS. 

 

The APCM is authorized for those who were assigned outside the 
CONUS in the Asiatic-Pacific Theater between 7 Dec 41 and 
2 Mar 46 for 30 consecutive or 60 nonconsecutive days. 

 

The service member’s entitlement to the WWIIVM, the AOM-Japan and 
Lapel Button have been verified. His records will be updated to 
reflect the WWIIVM and AOM-Japan. The Lapel Button is already 
listed on his WD AGO 53-55. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s requests for 
the GCM, ACM, and APCM, indicating there is no evidence of an 
error or injustice. As for her request related to the GCM, they 
were unable to verify if the service member’s entire active duty 
service was honorable; he also did not complete the requisite 
three years of continuous active service for award of the GCM. 
As for his request related to the ACM, the service member was 
ineligible as he did not complete an aggregate period of one year 
in the CONUS, nor did he serve outside of the CONUS in the 
American Theater for at least 30 days, during the qualifying 
period (7 Dec 41 through 2 Mar 46). The service member did not 
serve during the inclusive period required for award of the APCM. 
Finally, while the service member’s entitlement to the WWII Lapel 
Button has been verified, it appears as though his record already 
reflects his entitlement. 

 

AFPC/DPSIDR’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 23 Sep 11, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this 
date, no response has been received by this office. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice with regard to 
the applicant’s request for the GCM, ACM, and APCM. We took 
notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
former service member has not been the victim of an error or 
injustice. As for the applicant’s request pertaining to the WWII 
Lapel Button, in view of the fact the former service member’s 
military personnel records already indicate his entitlement to 
the Lapel Button, there is no corrective action required by this 
Board. We note the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
has verified and administratively corrected the former service 
member’s record to reflect entitlement to the WWIIVM and AOM-
Japan. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we 
find no basis to recommend granting any relief beyond that 
rendered administratively. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: 

 

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application. 

 

_________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03020 in Executive Session on 22 Mar 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

 , Vice Chair 

 , Member 

 , Member 


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2011-03020 was considered: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Jul 11, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Available Master Military Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIDRA, dated 7 Sep 11. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Sep 11. 

 

 

 

 

 

 Vice Chair 



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00108

    Original file (BC-2011-00108.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    By letter dated 25 May 11, HQ AFPC/DPSOAA states there is no evidence to support the applicant’s deceased grandfather enlisted rather than being inducted under the selective service system which was highly active during WWII. His date of induction is recorded in block 22 as 16 Feb 42, matching his date of entry on active duty recorded in block 24. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00101

    Original file (BC-2010-00101.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00101 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show he received the following awards: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120011176

    Original file (20120011176.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show award of the Distinguished Unit Citation/Presidential Unit Citation (DUC/PUC), Army of Occupation Medal-Germany (AOM-Germany), American Campaign Medal (ACM), and World War II (WWII) Victory Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by adding the WWII Victory Medal and AOM-Germany to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 03890

    Original file (BC 2011 03890.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the BSM w/1OLC, PH w/3OLCs, CIB, PUC w/2OLCs, PRPUC, APCM and Gold Star Lapel Ribbon On 5 Dec 13, the PH Review Board reviewed and approved the applicant’s request that his uncle be awarded the PH. While we have no documentary evidence that confirms, with any certainty, what period the former member was assigned to the 3rd...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05076

    Original file (BC-2011-05076.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-05076 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. AFPC/DPSIDR will administratively correct the applicant’s AOM to AOM-G. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIDR recommends denial of the applicant’s request for award of the EAMECM and...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002074657C070403

    Original file (2002074657C070403.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    PROCEEDINGS BOARD DATE: 7 November 2002 DOCKET NUMBER: AR2002074657 Although no records, other than the applicant’s discharge, currently exists, it appears, based on the information on that discharge, that he is entitled to the four awards that have already been issued to him, and to have them added to his discharge document. That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by showing that the individual concerned was awarded the GCM and the ACM in addition...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001064349C070421

    Original file (2001064349C070421.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his application, he submits a copy of his WD AGO 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation - Honorable Discharge) and an unidentified photograph of seven soldiers posing for the photographer as one of them has a pressure bandage applied to his forehead by a soldier wearing a helmet with a medic’s insignia on it. Qualifying service includes service within the continental United States for an aggregate period of one year. In view of the foregoing, the applicant’s records...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01991

    Original file (BC 2013 01991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    NPRC records do not show he was awarded the Aerial Gunner Badge or the Aircrew Member Badge. However, he was awarded both since he completed training and served in a unit that completed combat missions. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. USAF/A3O-AIF recommends approval of the request for the Aircrew Member Badge.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110005635

    Original file (20110005635.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant requests, in effect, award of the Army Good Conduct Medal (AGCM) and correction of his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Service) to add the AGCM and Asiatic-Pacific Campaign Medal. The applicant's complete military records are not available to the Board for review. The applicant completed a qualifying period of service for award of the Army Good Conduct Medal on 24 April 1947.

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013059

    Original file (20090013059.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    Chapter 5 of the awards regulation contains guidance on service medals and service ribbons. Therefore, it would be appropriate to correct item 32 of his WD AGO Form 53-55 to reflect all eight campaigns identified and to correct item 33 by adding the DUC 1st Oak Leaf Cluster (2nd Award), Army Occupation Medal with Germany Clasp, and 1 silver service star, 3 bronze service stars and 1 bronze arrowhead with his EAME Campaign Medal. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the...