Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03063
Original file (BC-2011-03063.txt) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 

AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 

 

IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03063 

 COUNSEL: NONE 

 HEARING DESIRED: NO 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 

 

His records be corrected to include award of the Enlisted 
Aircrew Member Badge. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: 

 

Although he was on flying status for ten years, orders awarding 
him the Enlisted Aircrew Badge were never issued. 

 

He was first placed on flying status in Oct 1951, while assigned 
to the 123rd Fighter Bomber Wing and was continuously assigned 
flying duties through Apr 1961. 

 

He would like the orders to accompany the wings he wore for 
nineteen years to validate his wearing them and to provide 
memoirs for his grandchildren. 

 

In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal 
statement, electronic communiqué from the Air Force Retiree 
Services Section, and Air Force Wounded Warrior Program, copies 
of his DD Forms 214, Armed Forces of the United States – Report 
of Transfer or Discharge. 

 

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

STATEMENT OF FACTS: 

 

The applicant entered the Regular Air Force on 13 Oct 1947 as an 
aircraft maintenance apprentice, Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 
431X1A. He held that AFSC until he retired from the Air Force 
on 31 Jul 1969. 

 

On 21 Jan 1958, the applicant was awarded AFSC A43171A. The “A” 
prefix applies to airmen who hold a principal duty assignment in 
the AFSC and are required to fly “frequently and regularly.” 


They are placed in an indefinite flying status as long as they 
perform these duties and meet the physical requirements. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

HQ AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states in part, that in 
accordance with AFI 11-402, Aviation and Parachutist Service, 
Aeronautical Ratings and Badges, paragraph 7.4.1.3, members 
participating in at least 10 combat missions as a primary 
aircrew member in a designated combat zone are permanently 
awarded the basic Aircrew Member Badge. The applicant does not 
provide flying status documentation or aeronautical orders 
qualifying him for an Aircrew Member Badge. 

 

The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: 

 

The applicant disagrees with the “Recommendation” to deny the 
award of the Aircrew Member Badge due to lack of adequate 
documentation. He was first placed on “flying status” in 
1951 and remained so continuously until 1962. He is sure orders 
were issued in 1952 or 1953 awarding him the basic Aircrew 
Badge, although it is not reflected on his DD Form 214. 

 

He provides a description of his assignments for which he 
received flight pay. The recommendation to deny relief is based 
upon current criteria regarding award of aviation badges, and 
has little to do with how such awards were given 50 years ago. 
In the past, orders were published placing an airman on duty, 
which required one year of continuous flying status to be 
eligible for the award of an aviation badge. 

 

Senior wings required an airman to complete 2,000 flying hours 
and seven years of continuous flying duty. Although he met the 
criteria for the senior badge, enlisted flight records were 
rarely kept. He requested senior wings be awarded, but could 
not produce the required documentation to substantiate his 
claim. However, he is sure that orders were completed awarding 
him the initial aviation badge in 1952. 

 

His complete response is at Exhibit E. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

 

 


 

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 

 

1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations. 

 

2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 

 

3. After careful review of the available evidence, it appears 
the applicant was in fact eligible for the Aircrew Member Badge. 
In this respect, we note the evidence indicated the applicant 
served the requisite 36-months for award of the basic badge 
during his period of Aviation Service in accordance with 
AFM 35-13, Flying Status Aeronautical Ratings, Designations and 
Parachute Jump Status, dated 3 Jun 1957. Furthermore, evidence 
indicates he served as a First Priority Crew Member for over 
seven years and qualifies for the Senior Aircrew Member Badge. 
In view of the above it is our opinion that his records should 
be corrected to reflect award of the Senior Aircrew Member Badge 
as indicated below. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: 

 

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was 
awarded the Senior Aircrew Member Badge. 

 

________________________________________________________________ 

 

The following members of the Board considered in Docket number 
BC-2011-03063 in Executive Session on 19 Apr 12, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603: 

 

  Panel Chair 

  Member 

  Member 

 

 
 

All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The 
following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR BC-2011-
03063: 

 

 Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Jul 2011, w/atchs. 

 Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. 

 Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIM, dated 23 Feb 2011. 

 Exhibit D. Letter, Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Feb 2012. 

 Exhibit E. Rebuttal, Applicant, dated 6 Mar 2012. 
 
 

 Panel Chair 

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-03394

    Original file (BC-2013-03394.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    Aeronautical orders are not related to travel orders and would have been required in addition to the travel orders. Members who are properly qualified and directed to perform specific inflight duties, not on a frequent and regular basis, may be ordered to do so using a flight authorization.” AFR 60-13, paragraph 7-5 states “Nonrated officers are authorized to wear the officer aircrew member badge while assigned to and performing aircrew duties in a designated MSL position identified by a G,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03012

    Original file (BC-2005-03012.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03012 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 4 APR 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Presidential Outstanding Unit Citation (PUC), the Korean Service Medal (KSM), and the Aviation Badge. A complete copy of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02610

    Original file (BC 2013 02610.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _______________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s requests for the VSM, RVGC w/P, PUC, VCM, KSM, NATO Medal, Cold War Medal, AFOR-L and AFOR-S. DPSID was unable to locate any documentation in the applicant’s records verifying he served in Vietnam or an area of eligibility for award of the VSM, RVGC w/P or VCM. In regards to the list of medals and unit awards, he was seeking help in finding out whether any...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05893

    Original file (BC 2013 05893.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandums prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C through F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A3O-AIF recommends granting the Aircrew Member Badge. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice regarding the applicant’s request that his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the award of the Missile...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04057

    Original file (BC 2013 04057.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibilities (OPRs) which are included at Exhibits C, D, E and F. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/A3O-AIF recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the award of the Aeronautical Badge because she did not have at least 36 months of operational flying to be permanently awarded the Aircrew Member Badge. In accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-3203,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00305

    Original file (BC 2014 00305.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    His records be corrected to reflect he was awarded the wings and rating as a fixed wing pilot. Apparently, and unknown to the applicant, the Air National Guard (ANG) decided not to follow the Air Force Predator entry requirements as outlined in AFI 11-402, Aviation and Parachutist Service Aeronautical Ratings and Aviation Badges, instead they decided he could not enter Predator training without first completing a fixed wing aviation training program; FWQ. Also significant is the unanimous...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02639

    Original file (BC-2012-02639.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. According to the applicant's statement, he was a member of the Air Force Reserve for about 3 years and 3 months. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 14 Feb 2013, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered in AFBCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-00612

    Original file (BC-2012-00612.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Attained at least 150 hours of flying duty as an The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/A3O-AIF recommends denial of the applicant’s request for the Aircrew Member and Flight Engineer Badges indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. We note...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05881

    Original file (BC 2013 05881.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05881 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Air Force Observer Wings In Accordance With (IAW) AFR 50-7, Aeronautical Ratings and Requirements for their Attainment, dated 13 Mar 53. In an application dated 30 Dec 12, the applicant requested an exception to policy to AFR 50-7 due to the fact that he was in a TDY status to an Air Force unit while...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02163

    Original file (BC 2013 02163.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02163 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect award of the Korean Service Medal (KSM) and Air Force Crew Wings. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force, which...