RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01608
INDEX CODE: 137.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her deceased common-law husband’s records be corrected to entitle her to a
Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuity.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She and the deceased were common-law married since late 1997. They brought
a house in 2001 and lived as husband and wife until his death on 18 Aug 09.
He deemed her as his beneficiary because she was his caregiver and wife
for many years.
The information she submitted proves he wanted her to receive a SBP
annuity. He named her as beneficiary over all of his affairs but forgot to
include the SBP.
In support of her request, the applicant submits a personal statement,
copies of a death certificate, last will and testament, direct deposit
forms and envelopes addressed to her.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The member and spouse were married on 8 Oct 41. He retired on 1 Sep 69.
He elected spouse only SBP coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay
during the initial SBP open enrollment period. He increased his reduced
level of SBP coverage during an open enrollment period from 1 Oct 81 to
30 Sep 82. Subsequently, he increased his enrollment coverage to the
maximum level and elected full spouse Supplemental SBP coverage during an
open enrollment period from 1 Apr 92 to 31 Mar 93. His spouse died on 17
May 97 and SBP costs were suspended. His death certificate reflects he was
married when he died and the applicant was his common-law spouse.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from
the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by
the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
DPSIAR has no recommendation. DPSIAR notes the decedent’s death
certificate does not properly document the applicant’s common-law marriage,
but reflects the information provided by his family at the time of his
death. His last will and testament states “At the time of execution of
this Will, I am not married…” and it identifies the applicant as the
recipient of his estate.
DPSIAR states SBP is awarded to common-law spouses who properly validate
they resided in a state that recognizes common-law marriages and the union
existed for one full year – the required length of post-retirement
marriages before the spouse becomes eligible as an SBP beneficiary.
The complete DPSIAR evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant submits two letters from two physicians who always viewed she
and the former service member as being married.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. Based on a review of this case by the MRB
Legal Advisor, it appears that under Texas law, the applicant and deceased
member had to meet three requirements to be recognized as having a common-
law marriage. Unfortunately, it appears that only two of the requirements
were met. The recognition process requires individuals to complete a
declaration of informal marriage form, issued by the court, and meet the
legal requirements which are stated as a three-prong test. Specifically,
the evidence must show that the parties agreed to be married, that they
lived together in Texas as husband and wife, and they have publicly
represented themselves as married. Moreover, all three of these requisites
must exist at the same time. Based on the evidence submitted by the
applicant, we are persuaded that two of the three requirements were met,
i.e., the applicant and deceased member lived together for many years and
publicly represented themselves as married. Nevertheless, based on the
applicant and deceased member never taking steps to complete a declaration
of informal marriage form and the statement in the deceased member’s will
that they were not married, we do not believe it would be proper for us to
conclude that the applicant and deceased member were in a common-law
marriage. However, should the applicant obtain recognition from the state
of Texas that she and the applicant were in a common law marriage, we would
be willing to reconsider her request. Therefore, in the absence of
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application at this time.
_______________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2010-01608 in
Executive Session on 23 Feb 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence in AFBCMR BC-2010-01608 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Mar 10, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPSIAR, dated 18 Jun 10.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Jul 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 9 Aug 10, w/atch.
Exhibit E. Letter, applicant, dated 23 Aug 10, w/atch.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01608
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01608 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The former member’s record be corrected to authorize Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) spouse coverage. DPSIAR states there is no evidence of an Air Force error; however, to preclude an injustice, they recommend the former member’s record be corrected to...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090013359
Public Law 95-397, the RCSBP, enacted 30 September 1978, provided a way for those who had qualified for reserve retirement but were not yet age 60 to provide an annuity for their survivors should they die before reaching age 60. The evidence available to the Board indicates the FSM annotated on his October 1993 DD Form 1883 that he was not married at the time he elected to provide an annuity to his dependent son. There is no evidence, and the applicant has not provided any, that the FSM...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02880
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-02880 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased former spouses record be changed to show he elected spouse coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The decedent and the applicant were...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03362
The member and the applicant were allegedly married in Tijuana, Mexico on 8 Jun 82, and he elected spouse only coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay during the open enrollment authorized by Public Law (PL) 97-35 (1 Oct 81 30 Sep 82). The Air Force office of primary responsibility has recommended that we consider voiding the decedent's 23 Sep 82 election for SBP coverage for the applicant, suggesting that the "erroneous deductions of SBP premiums for spouse coverage be refunded...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2004 | 2004101070C070208
The applicant states that they divorced in 1996. The applicant provided evidence to show she and the FSM lived together after their divorce; however, she provided insufficient evidence to show that she and the FSM were party to a common law marriage for SBP annuity purposes. Nevertheless, there is sufficient evidence to show that it was the FSM's intent to continue to provide the SBP for the applicant.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00062
She indicates there is no evidence the deceased former member elected former spouse coverage for any of his former spouses. In Dec 92, DFAS received an SBP Open Enrollment Election form from the member requesting to change the applicants coverage from spouse to former spouse. A complete copy of the AFRBA Legal Advisor evaluation is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant contends...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2011-05023
However, they were married on 3 Jan 2011. In order for a spouse, who married a member after his/her retirement, to be considered eligible for the SBP annuity, the post-retirement marriage must endure for one full year from the date of marriage. Although the applicant provides evidence that recognizes their relationship as a marriage, the law requires a member to be married for one full year before the widow is eligible for SBP payments, assuming the member...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03821
DFAS records reflect the decedent elected maximum child only SBP coverage prior to his 1 Sep 89 retirement. Records further contain an annotation that the applicant concurred with the members SBP election prior to his retirement. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02043
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: While married, the member elected spouse and child coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay under the SBP prior to his 1 Jun 73 retirement. There is no record of marriage at the time of his death. While counsel argues the former member never married; the evidence of record, specifically, the death certificate states otherwise.
ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050000299C070206
LaVerne M. Douglas | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The evidence of record in this case confirms the FSM completed a DD Form 1883 declining enrollment in the SBP on 17 January 1974, during his retirement processing. Because the FSM was married and yet declined SBP enrollment at the time of his retirement, he was no longer eligible to participate in the SBP at the time he and the applicant entered into their...