RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-01632
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reentry (RE) code of 2C (Entry level separation without characterization of service) be upgraded.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His service connected injury was mishandled and there was a misunderstanding regarding his desire to remain in the Air Force.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force. Accordingly, there is no need to recite these facts in this Record of Proceedings.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice with respect to his discharge processing. On 13 Feb 09, his commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for mental disorders, specifically, an adjustment disorder with depressed mood, which was severe enough that his ability to function in the military was significantly impaired. The applicant stated during his mental health interview that his current state of depression would only be resolved if he returned home. Additionally, during a follow up session with the mental health clinic, he admitted that he had suicidal ideations and even suggested he should be admitted to an inpatient facility. He acknowledged receipt of the action and waived his right to consult with legal counsel or to submit statements on his own behalf. The discharge authority approved the separation and directed the applicant be furnished an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service. The record also reveals he received a sprained knee and received medication to alleviate the pain, but apparently he was cleared to continue training. Based on the documentation on file, the applicant’s entry-level separation was appropriately administered and within the discretion of the discharge authority. Airmen are given an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service when separation is initiated within the first 180 days of continuous active service. The Department of Defense determined it would be unfair to the member and the department to characterize a member’s limited service of less than 180 days.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the United States Air Force, requires an RE code of 2C be issued based on the applicant’s entry-level separation with uncharacterized service. He does not provide any evidence of an error or injustice with regard to his RE code.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 18 Oct 10 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After careful consideration of the applicant's request and the available evidence of record, we find insufficient evidence of error or injustice to warrant corrective action. The facts and opinions stated in the advisory opinions appear to be based on the evidence of record and have not been adequately rebutted by applicant. Absent persuasive evidence the applicant was denied rights to which he was entitled, appropriate regulations were not followed, or appropriate standards were not applied, we find no basis to disturb the existing record.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2010-01632 in Executive Session on 20 Jan 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, Panel Chair
Ms. XXXXXXXXXX, Member
Mr. XXXXXXXXXX, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Sep 09, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOS, dated 16 Sep 10.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 18 Oct 10.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Nov 10.
XXXXXXXXXX
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2009-04506
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-04506 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation of “Mental Disorder” and Reentry (RE) code of 2C (Entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed to allow him to reenlist. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-00791
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2009-00791 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C which denotes "Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service" be changed. The complete DPSOS evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04207
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04207 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code of 2C (Entry-level separation (ELS) with uncharacterized service) be changed. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02620
He was discharged with an uncharacterized, entry-level separation for Personality Disorder and issued a separation code of JFX and an RE code of 2C on 25 Sep 02. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C and D. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04212
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial. DPSOS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records the discharge to include the RE code and separation code was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. DPSOS found no evidence of an error or injustice in the processing of the applicants...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03120
She provided no facts warranting changing the narrative reason for separation to “fulfillment of service” or a change to her RE code. Therefore, her uncharacterized character of service is correct and in accordance with DoD and Air Force instructions. The DPSOA evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 26...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04634
On 22 Aug 02, the applicants commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for mental disorders. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends the applicants narrative reason for separation and SPD code be administratively corrected to reflect Secretarial Authority and KFF, respectively, indicating that prior to 2003, the Services characterized all individuals discharged due to mental...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2009-01107
On 4 Feb 09, the applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend his discharge from the Air Force for entry level performance and conduct in accordance with AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen . Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the service characterization, was appropriately administered and within the discretion of the discharge authority. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2010-03211
On 30 Mar 98, the applicant’s commander notified him of his intention to recommend his discharge from the Air Force for homosexual conduct under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen . The applicant does not provide any proof of an error or injustice with respect to the RE code he was issued in conjunction with his ELS with uncharacterized service. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the applicant’s entry-level separation (ELS) for homosexual...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01606
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01606 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial of the applicants request to change his RE code and narrative reason for separation. After reviewing the evidence of record,...