AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00826
AFBCMR BC-2011-00826 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36- 2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00828
AFBCMR BC-2011-00828 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00832
In accordance with Public Law (PL) 99-145, spouse coverage is automatically reinstated when a servicemember does not submit a timely request to terminate spouse coverage. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00836
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00836 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Separation (DOS) be changed to 15 Sep 64. ________________________________________________________________ THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOS recommends denial, stating, in part, based on the documentation on file in the master...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00846
AFBCMR BC-2011-00846 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Under the authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code and Air Force Instruction 36-2603, and having assured compliance with the provisions of the above regulation, the decision of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records is announced, and it is directed that: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to XXXXXXXX, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Legion of Merit for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00848
AFBCMR BC-2011-00848 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00853
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00853 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her husbands DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge be corrected to reflect his service in Vietnam. The complete DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00854
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ USAF/A1PA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant stated he started the VONAPP process; perhaps he tried to transfer his benefits to his dependents in this system and not the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00868
On 27 Apr 11, a request for information pertaining to his post- service activities was forwarded to the applicant for response within 30 days. However, we would like to point out that if the applicant were to provide post-service information as requested in our letter, dated 27 Apr 11, we would be willing to reconsider his request. Nonetheless, having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00869
AFBCMR BC-2011-00869 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, considered this application on 6 July 2011. Deputy Executive Director Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00872
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00872 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation code and narrative reason be changed to a hardship separation. He states that the Air Force does not have any proof or reason for the separation code that was given. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00874
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: During his out-processing, he requested a $600.00 deduction (reflected on his attached finance worksheet AF Form 3500, Separation Pay Worksheet) be deducted from his final pay to go towards the MGIB Increased Benefit Contribution Program (also known as MGIB Bill buy-up or kicker program). DPSIT states although the applicant may have been capable of paying the $600.00, there was no money ever...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00875
Based on the above changes to his record, the Board recommended his corrected record he be considered for promotion to the grade of Lt Col by SSB for CY10A and CY11A _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request to void his current PRF and replace it with a PRF generated by his current Senior Rater within his current command. The PRF portrays the leadership potential for promotion to the grade...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00876
AFBCMR BC-2011-00876 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00877
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He missed promotion testing during cycle 10E7, due to medical conditions. He was supposed to test on 16 Feb 11, but missed his testing time due to these medical issues. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 May 11.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00884
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00884 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) be upgraded to honorable. The discharge authority recommended the applicant receive an honorable discharge; however, the discharge process was deferred pending the outcome of a dual- action process on 9 Sep 85....
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00887 ADDENDUM
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00887 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Medal for Humane Action (MHA) for his participation in the Berlin Airlift. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants separation; and, the rationale of the earlier decision by the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00891
On 7 November 1974, the applicant received an LOR for failure to report to his appointed place of duty on 21 October 1974. On 31 December 1974, his commander recommended the applicants request be approved. On 20 October 1976, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded the applicants discharge characterization to general (under honorable conditions) under the reason of current policy and clemency.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00892
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00892 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1) His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In an undated memorandum, the separation authority approved the discharge and directed the applicant be separated from the Air Force with a general (under honorable...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00904
ADMINISTRATIVELY CORRECTED He be awarded any additional Air Medals. By letter, dated 31 October 2011, AFPC/DPAPP, advised the applicant they had verified and confirmed his foreign service at Pleiku, Republic of Vietnam, but were unable to determine the exact amount of time served at this location. The complete AFPC/DPSIDR evaluation is at exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00905
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicants military records are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit B. DPSIM states that on 23 Apr 2012, a memorandum was sent to the applicant requesting additional documentation, specifically, a signed memorandum from the local base weather office stating that the temperature that day was less than 20 degrees Fahrenheit. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00906
Section One: By amendment at Exhibit F, his Air Force Academy (AFA) recoupment principal of 3,499.17 be reduced. Section Three: By amendment at Exhibit F, his debt of $2,057.71 (medical facility costs) to the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) be removed. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00913
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00913 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His official records be corrected to update his general (under honorable conditions) discharge to honorable. The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00914
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00914 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect service in the Philippines, Iceland, Thailand, and Vietnam. When he checked his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, all of the blocks were marked N/A. He later found...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00924
Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. In addition, there is no provision of law that authorizes a member to be promoted to a higher grade at the time of retirement. We have carefully considered the applicants submission and we are not persuaded that the applicants request for retirement in the grade of lieutenant colonel should be granted.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00925
AFBCMR BC-2011-00925 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00931
On 27 Apr 83, the applicant was discharged and received a general discharge. Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant favorable action on her request. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00933
The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant provides additional information to support the fact that he was stationed at the bomb dump on Udorn AFB Thailand and requests that his case be confirmed as correct. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission, his most recent submission, dated 13 Dec 11, in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00942
In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, medical records and letters from his doctors. On 19 Nov 08, the applicant was notified of his commanders intent to recommend that he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32, Air Force Military Training and AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, paragraph 5.14. for Erroneous Enlistment. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00944
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The evidence supporting the allegations against him is all circumstantial and the video surveillance tapes do not actually show him removing or replacing any stickers. The applicant is in error in stating that the absence of direct video evidence showing his alleged sticker-swapping offenses is proof that they were not committed at all. After considering the matters raised by the applicant, the...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00953
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00953 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 2C reentry (RE) code (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed. DPSOS states the applicant was discharged for unsatisfactory progress in training based upon...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00966
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00966 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The applicants record was administratively corrected to reflect his entitlement to the RVNGC w/P, the RVCM, the Vietnam Service Medal with three bronze service stars (VSM w/3BSS and the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00971
In support of his appeal, the applicant submits a statement from his counsel; the FPEB findings and recommendations; his concurrence with the FPEB findings and recommendations; the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) findings and recommendations; Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) Report; four Medical Board Evaluations; memorandum to the FPEB; his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty; DVA findings and rating decision; VASARD excerpt; and two letters of support....
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00976
SGPS states a review of the records provided shows the applicant was separated after blood tests demonstrated he had the sickle cell trait. DPSOS states that based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction. The applicant has provided no evidence showing that his discharge is in error or contrary to the prevailing instruction.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00978
AFBCMR BC-2011-00978 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00980
AFBCMR BC-2011-00980 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, considered this application on 29 June 2011. Deputy Executive Director Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00987
AFBCMR BC-2011-00987 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Members of the Board, considered this application on 6 December 2011. Deputy Executive Director Air Force Board for Correction of...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00990
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was disability retired with a compensable rating of 30 percent and all of his service, both active and inactive should be credited when computing his retired pay. The board reviewed the narrative summary regarding the member's medical conditions of chronic back and neck pain. Has 20 or more years of active service in the Uniformed Services for the purpose of computing the amount of retired pay, or...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01003
In support of his request, the applicant provides a statement from counsel and copies of documents extracted from his military records. On 3 Jan 11, his commander notified him that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force for the commission of a serious offense. ____________________________________________________________ _____ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2011-01003 in Executive Session on 6 Dec 11, under the provisions of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01006
AFBCMR BC-2011-01006 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01010
AFBCMR BC-2011-01010 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01019
AFBCMR BC-2011-01019 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01024
AFBCMR BC-2011-01024 MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION BEFORE THE AFBCMR SUBJECT: Having carefully reviewed this application, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the applicant has been the victim of either an error or an injustice. Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01030
________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Upon his transfer from active duty to the Air Force Reserve, the Military Personnel Flight advised him that by completing his normal training requirement he would be able to acquire enough points to be credited with a good year. The well-intentioned course of action led to an unsatisfactory year of service for RYE Feb 96. Accordingly, we recommend the applicants record be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01032
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01032 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO IN THE MATTER OF: _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be compensated for his Personally Procured Move (PPM) as briefed to him by the Hickam Transportation Management Office (TMO). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The TMO office incorrectly...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01035
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01035 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect entitlement to the following medals: 1. The Combat Readiness Medal (CRM). DPSIDR states the applicant provided Flight Records, dated 3 Aug 77, that indicate combat...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01036
On 6 Jun 89, the applicant was discharged and received a general discharge. On 27 Feb 97, the Air Force Discharge Review Board denied the applicants request for an upgrade of his discharge. After careful consideration of the available evidence, the discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing regulations in effect at the time and we find no evidence to indicate the applicants separation from the Air Force was inappropriate.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01042
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01042 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty be corrected as follows: 1. The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the processing of his discharge warranting a change to his...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01045
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force which is located at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSD recommends denial. However, the PEB rates only the unfitting disability as it exists at the time of the board. The complete DPSD evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01047
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibits C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AF/A1PA indicates that both the Department of Defense (DoD) and Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) widely publicized the Post- 9/11 GI Bill and the transferability feature. While we note the steps the Air Force office of primary...