RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-00868
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He believes there was an error in his undesirable discharge. He
did not have any disciplinary problems while serving on active
duty.
In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his
DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the
United States, and a copy of a letter from the Veterans Service
Office.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Pursuant to the Boards request, the Federal Bureau of
Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an Investigative Report,
which is at Exhibit B. On 27 Apr 11, a copy of the FBI report
was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within
30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this
office.
On 27 Apr 11, a request for information pertaining to his post-
service activities was forwarded to the applicant for response
within 30 days.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. After careful
consideration of the available evidence, we found no indication
the actions taken to effect his discharge were improper or
contrary to the provisions of the governing regulations in effect
at the time, or the actions taken against the applicant were
based on factors other than his own misconduct. However, we
would like to point out that if the applicant were to provide
post-service information as requested in our letter, dated 27 Apr
11, we would be willing to reconsider his request. Nonetheless,
having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions
that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we
conclude that no basis exists to grant favorable action on his
request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 7 Jun 11, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Mar 11, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. FBI Report.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 27 Apr 11.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00040
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Most of the applicant’s records were destroyed in the Jul 73 fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC). Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS provided their rationale for...
The Board recommended discharge from the service because of unfitness, with an undesirable discharge. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 15 Feb 01, the Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, reviewed the application and states that the applicant did not provide evidence of errors...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01015
On 11 Jul 77, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his UOTHC discharge. The applicant has provided no persuasive evidence showing the actions taken against him were based on factors other than his own misconduct or that his discharge was unjust, improper, or contrary to the provisions of the governing regulations in effect at the time. Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 19 Apr 06.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, WV, provided a report of Applicant’s arrest record (Exhibit C). After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are unpersuaded that relief should be granted. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 19 May 00.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01815
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-01815 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 27 Apr 49, the board of officers convened and recommended the applicant be discharge with an undesirable discharge. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01405
Applicant was separated from the Air Force on 8 July 1955 under the provisions of AFR 39-17, Discharge of Airman Because of Unfitness, with an undesirable discharge. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F).
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-02255
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-02255 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 5 Jul 57, the applicants commander recommended the applicant undergo an administrative discharge board under the provisions of Air Force Regulation (AFR) 39-17 for a determination of fitness for...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00588
The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluation and the FBI report were forwarded to the applicant on 21 March 2003 and 21 April 2003 for review and comment (Exhibits D and G). Exhibit B. Exhibit F. FBI Record MD0SI0100, dated 8 Apr 03.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC 2011 01683
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01683 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. In support of this application, the applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. Having found no...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04408
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-04408 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. In this respect, we note that while the repeal of DADT provides a basis for correcting the records of certain affected service members, specific criteria must generally be met: (1) the...